非暴力与人权的基本关系

The Acorn Pub Date : 1998-07-01 DOI:10.5840/ACORN1998923
J. Morton
{"title":"非暴力与人权的基本关系","authors":"J. Morton","doi":"10.5840/ACORN1998923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this essay is to explore some important relations between the principles of nonviolence and the principles of human rights  relations which I believe are highly significant, theoretically and practically. Advocates of these two approaches1 to fundamental issues of human values and human relations can make valuable contributions to the understanding and support of each others' positions. It may even be true that the two approaches overlap completely in denotation: that is, that every instance in which a particular action could be justified as a correct application of principles of human rights could equally well be justified as a correct application of principles of nonviolence. But even if one could devise a knock-down argument to collapse the two positions into one, I do not see that anything would be gained by such a \"reduction.\" The connotations of the two views are quite different, as is indicated in Section 1. It is, I think, more productive to see the two approaches as complementary — mutually enlightening and supportive. I hope the reader will be convinced of that; I have no desire to argue further for identifying the two positions.","PeriodicalId":293445,"journal":{"name":"The Acorn","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fundamental Relations Between Nonviolence and Human Rights\",\"authors\":\"J. Morton\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/ACORN1998923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this essay is to explore some important relations between the principles of nonviolence and the principles of human rights  relations which I believe are highly significant, theoretically and practically. Advocates of these two approaches1 to fundamental issues of human values and human relations can make valuable contributions to the understanding and support of each others' positions. It may even be true that the two approaches overlap completely in denotation: that is, that every instance in which a particular action could be justified as a correct application of principles of human rights could equally well be justified as a correct application of principles of nonviolence. But even if one could devise a knock-down argument to collapse the two positions into one, I do not see that anything would be gained by such a \\\"reduction.\\\" The connotations of the two views are quite different, as is indicated in Section 1. It is, I think, more productive to see the two approaches as complementary — mutually enlightening and supportive. I hope the reader will be convinced of that; I have no desire to argue further for identifying the two positions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Acorn\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Acorn\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/ACORN1998923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Acorn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/ACORN1998923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是探讨非暴力原则和人权原则之间的一些重要关系关系,我认为这在理论上和实践上都是非常重要的。这两种解决人类价值观和人际关系基本问题的方法的倡导者可以为理解和支持彼此的立场做出宝贵的贡献。这两种方法甚至可能在外义上完全重叠:也就是说,每一个可以被证明是正确适用人权原则的特定行动的实例,同样可以被证明是正确适用非暴力原则的实例。但是,即使一个人能想出一个彻底的论证,把这两种立场合二为一,我也看不出这样的“简化”会有什么好处。正如第1节所指出的,这两种观点的内涵是完全不同的。我认为,把这两种方法看作是互补的——相互启发和支持,会更有成效。我希望读者能相信这一点;我不想为确定这两种立场作进一步的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fundamental Relations Between Nonviolence and Human Rights
The purpose of this essay is to explore some important relations between the principles of nonviolence and the principles of human rights  relations which I believe are highly significant, theoretically and practically. Advocates of these two approaches1 to fundamental issues of human values and human relations can make valuable contributions to the understanding and support of each others' positions. It may even be true that the two approaches overlap completely in denotation: that is, that every instance in which a particular action could be justified as a correct application of principles of human rights could equally well be justified as a correct application of principles of nonviolence. But even if one could devise a knock-down argument to collapse the two positions into one, I do not see that anything would be gained by such a "reduction." The connotations of the two views are quite different, as is indicated in Section 1. It is, I think, more productive to see the two approaches as complementary — mutually enlightening and supportive. I hope the reader will be convinced of that; I have no desire to argue further for identifying the two positions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“A Fulfillment So High”: New Directions in African American Philosophy for the Study of Howard Thurman and Martin Luther King, Jr. Thurman’s Philosophical De-Mystified Mysticism Techno-Satyagraha COVID-19 and perioperative nursing – inside the NSW State Emergency Operation Centre Hull House, the Pullman Strike, and Tolstoy: Documenting the Work of Jane Addams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1