{"title":"体外眼刺激试验的现状。","authors":"A M Goldberg, P M Silber","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reviews advances in the validation of alternative methods for eye irritation testing since the 1987 publication, A Critical Evaluation of Alternatives to Acute Ocular Irritation Testing (1). We have highlighted details of methods that appear promising and identified the minimum needs and endpoints necessary to develop a battery or batteries of in vitro tests to evaluate eye irritancy. We have recommended a series of workshops to provide identified batteries for specific classes of chemicals or for specific uses of eye irritancy testing. We have also identified the need for consensus meetings and peer-reviewed publication to ensure that the most predictive batteries become parts of validation studies. Finally, we note that academic scientists, industry, government and the animal protection community must work together in order to replace in vivo eye irritancy testing with appropriately validated in vitro methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":17964,"journal":{"name":"Lens and eye toxicity research","volume":"9 3-4","pages":"161-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Status of in vitro ocular irritation testing.\",\"authors\":\"A M Goldberg, P M Silber\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper reviews advances in the validation of alternative methods for eye irritation testing since the 1987 publication, A Critical Evaluation of Alternatives to Acute Ocular Irritation Testing (1). We have highlighted details of methods that appear promising and identified the minimum needs and endpoints necessary to develop a battery or batteries of in vitro tests to evaluate eye irritancy. We have recommended a series of workshops to provide identified batteries for specific classes of chemicals or for specific uses of eye irritancy testing. We have also identified the need for consensus meetings and peer-reviewed publication to ensure that the most predictive batteries become parts of validation studies. Finally, we note that academic scientists, industry, government and the animal protection community must work together in order to replace in vivo eye irritancy testing with appropriately validated in vitro methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lens and eye toxicity research\",\"volume\":\"9 3-4\",\"pages\":\"161-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lens and eye toxicity research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lens and eye toxicity research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文回顾了自1987年出版的《急性眼刺激测试替代方法的关键评估》(A Critical Evaluation of alternative to Acute Ocular stimulation testing)以来,在验证眼刺激测试替代方法方面的进展(1)。我们重点介绍了看起来有前途的方法的细节,并确定了开发一组或多组体外测试来评估眼刺激所需的最低需求和终点。我们建议举办一系列研讨会,为特定类别的化学品或特定用途的眼睛刺激测试提供鉴定的电池。我们还确定了共识会议和同行评审出版物的必要性,以确保最具预测性的电池成为验证研究的一部分。最后,我们注意到,学术界、工业界、政府和动物保护界必须共同努力,以适当验证的体外方法取代体内眼睛刺激测试。
This paper reviews advances in the validation of alternative methods for eye irritation testing since the 1987 publication, A Critical Evaluation of Alternatives to Acute Ocular Irritation Testing (1). We have highlighted details of methods that appear promising and identified the minimum needs and endpoints necessary to develop a battery or batteries of in vitro tests to evaluate eye irritancy. We have recommended a series of workshops to provide identified batteries for specific classes of chemicals or for specific uses of eye irritancy testing. We have also identified the need for consensus meetings and peer-reviewed publication to ensure that the most predictive batteries become parts of validation studies. Finally, we note that academic scientists, industry, government and the animal protection community must work together in order to replace in vivo eye irritancy testing with appropriately validated in vitro methods.