C Kucukesmen, A. Usumez, B. Uludag, B. Gunduz, C H Kucukesmen, O. Acar
{"title":"光固化方式和类型对树脂复合材料转化的影响。","authors":"C Kucukesmen, A. Usumez, B. Uludag, B. Gunduz, C H Kucukesmen, O. Acar","doi":"10.7727/wimj.2015.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nTo determine the efficacy of polymerization for two different curing units by examining the degree of conversion (DC) of seven different composite materials.\n\n\nMaterials and methods\nConventional halogen light (40 s) and a light-emitting diode curing unit (LED) [20 s] were used to polymerize seven different composite brands. A total number of 70 specimens were evaluated (n = 5). To determine the degree of conversion, Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy was used. For statistical analysis, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD post hoc test were applied (α = 0.05).\n\n\nResults\nDegree of conversion varied with both the light unit and type of composite, with significant interactions. Charisma (67.0 ± 6.0) and Z-250 (65.2 ± 3.3) showed the highest DC when cured using the LED, whereas Grandio (38.2 ± 3.5) showed the lowest when exposed to the conventional halogen light.\n\n\nConclusion\nDegree of conversion was affected by the type of light curing units and results varied greatly with respect to composite brand and type (nonofilled, macrofilled, hybrid, microhybrid and ormocer).","PeriodicalId":104133,"journal":{"name":"The West Indian medical journal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Light Curing Mode and Type on Conversion of Resin Composites.\",\"authors\":\"C Kucukesmen, A. Usumez, B. Uludag, B. Gunduz, C H Kucukesmen, O. Acar\",\"doi\":\"10.7727/wimj.2015.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective\\nTo determine the efficacy of polymerization for two different curing units by examining the degree of conversion (DC) of seven different composite materials.\\n\\n\\nMaterials and methods\\nConventional halogen light (40 s) and a light-emitting diode curing unit (LED) [20 s] were used to polymerize seven different composite brands. A total number of 70 specimens were evaluated (n = 5). To determine the degree of conversion, Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy was used. For statistical analysis, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD post hoc test were applied (α = 0.05).\\n\\n\\nResults\\nDegree of conversion varied with both the light unit and type of composite, with significant interactions. Charisma (67.0 ± 6.0) and Z-250 (65.2 ± 3.3) showed the highest DC when cured using the LED, whereas Grandio (38.2 ± 3.5) showed the lowest when exposed to the conventional halogen light.\\n\\n\\nConclusion\\nDegree of conversion was affected by the type of light curing units and results varied greatly with respect to composite brand and type (nonofilled, macrofilled, hybrid, microhybrid and ormocer).\",\"PeriodicalId\":104133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The West Indian medical journal\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The West Indian medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2015.031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The West Indian medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2015.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Light Curing Mode and Type on Conversion of Resin Composites.
Objective
To determine the efficacy of polymerization for two different curing units by examining the degree of conversion (DC) of seven different composite materials.
Materials and methods
Conventional halogen light (40 s) and a light-emitting diode curing unit (LED) [20 s] were used to polymerize seven different composite brands. A total number of 70 specimens were evaluated (n = 5). To determine the degree of conversion, Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy was used. For statistical analysis, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD post hoc test were applied (α = 0.05).
Results
Degree of conversion varied with both the light unit and type of composite, with significant interactions. Charisma (67.0 ± 6.0) and Z-250 (65.2 ± 3.3) showed the highest DC when cured using the LED, whereas Grandio (38.2 ± 3.5) showed the lowest when exposed to the conventional halogen light.
Conclusion
Degree of conversion was affected by the type of light curing units and results varied greatly with respect to composite brand and type (nonofilled, macrofilled, hybrid, microhybrid and ormocer).