因子分析中普通最小二乘与极大似然提取方法的内性违逆比较

Alabi Oluwapelumi, O. J. Kayode
{"title":"因子分析中普通最小二乘与极大似然提取方法的内性违逆比较","authors":"Alabi Oluwapelumi, O. J. Kayode","doi":"10.51983/ajsat-2017.6.2.992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main objectives of factor analysis is to reduce the number of parameters. The number of parameters in the original model is equal to the number of unique elements in the covariance matrix. The study compared ordinary least square and maximum likelihood method of extraction of factor analysis under two approaches such that the variables employed were assumed to be independent of error i.e endogeneity assumption in the first approach while the endogeneity assumption is violated by omitting the important variable HLT in the second approach. The result showed that the extracted factors under the violation of endogeneity has similar factors loading pattern which accounted for a great deal of variance and the factors do a good job of representing the original data and the Bayesian information criterion also showed that the maximum likelihood method of extraction slightly outperforms ordinary least square.","PeriodicalId":414891,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Science and Applied Technology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endogeneity Violation on the Comparison of Ordinary Least Square and Maximum Likelihood Extraction Method of Factor Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alabi Oluwapelumi, O. J. Kayode\",\"doi\":\"10.51983/ajsat-2017.6.2.992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the main objectives of factor analysis is to reduce the number of parameters. The number of parameters in the original model is equal to the number of unique elements in the covariance matrix. The study compared ordinary least square and maximum likelihood method of extraction of factor analysis under two approaches such that the variables employed were assumed to be independent of error i.e endogeneity assumption in the first approach while the endogeneity assumption is violated by omitting the important variable HLT in the second approach. The result showed that the extracted factors under the violation of endogeneity has similar factors loading pattern which accounted for a great deal of variance and the factors do a good job of representing the original data and the Bayesian information criterion also showed that the maximum likelihood method of extraction slightly outperforms ordinary least square.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Science and Applied Technology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Science and Applied Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51983/ajsat-2017.6.2.992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Science and Applied Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51983/ajsat-2017.6.2.992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因子分析的主要目标之一是减少参数的数量。原始模型中的参数个数等于协方差矩阵中唯一元素的个数。本研究比较了两种方法中提取因子分析的普通最小二乘法和最大似然法,其中第一种方法假定变量与误差无关,即内生性假设,而第二种方法忽略了重要变量HLT,违反了内生性假设。结果表明,在违反内质性的情况下,提取的因子具有相似的因子加载模式,占了很大的方差,因子很好地代表了原始数据,贝叶斯信息准则也表明,极大似然提取方法略优于普通最小二乘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endogeneity Violation on the Comparison of Ordinary Least Square and Maximum Likelihood Extraction Method of Factor Analysis
One of the main objectives of factor analysis is to reduce the number of parameters. The number of parameters in the original model is equal to the number of unique elements in the covariance matrix. The study compared ordinary least square and maximum likelihood method of extraction of factor analysis under two approaches such that the variables employed were assumed to be independent of error i.e endogeneity assumption in the first approach while the endogeneity assumption is violated by omitting the important variable HLT in the second approach. The result showed that the extracted factors under the violation of endogeneity has similar factors loading pattern which accounted for a great deal of variance and the factors do a good job of representing the original data and the Bayesian information criterion also showed that the maximum likelihood method of extraction slightly outperforms ordinary least square.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Attentional Dynamics in Animated Programming Environments: Trajectories, Variability, and Predictors The Mythical Construction of the Spread of Lassa Fever among Garri Marketers: Empirical Evidence from Edo State, Nigeria Effect of Ethanolic and Chloroform Extracts of Lantana Camara Flowers on the Second Instar Stage of Anopheles Mosquito Larvae Rejuvenation of Pesticide Polluted Soil from the Isolated Microbial Flora of Agricultural Field Characterization of Tannery Effluent and Efficiency Assessment of Central Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) at Savar in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1