O. Yilmaz, K. Radermacher, F. Beger, Jonas Roth, A. Janß
{"title":"基于IEEE 11073 SDC标准的流程优化集成工作站可用性评价","authors":"O. Yilmaz, K. Radermacher, F. Beger, Jonas Roth, A. Janß","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have identified that the Operating Room (OR) is costly to maintain, but also the most profit generating department. The 2019 approved ISO IEEE 11073 SDC family defines a manufacturer independent communication standard, which creates open interoperability in the OR and clinic for the first time. Using SDC, medical device data can be collected and used for display on a central cockpit, documentation purposes during an ongoing operation and also be streamed outside the OR. The goal of this research was to analyze and evaluate how medical device data and context information (current workflow step, location, patient, operator) could be used inside and outside the OR (e.g., maintenance and reparation) to improve clinical processes and benefit patient care. We also analyzed if the availability of such information might affect the efficiency and safety of patient care. A process analysis has been performed with clinical staff from the Uniklinik RWTH Aachen. The planning procedure of the OR management has been discussed and clinical use cases have been discussed with nurses, surgeons and anesthesiologists. Potential improvements using interoperable device data have been developed and corresponding interactive functional models have been implemented and discussed with the user groups. After several iterations, these concepts were implemented as part of surgical, anesthesia and OR management workstations. A formative usability evaluation (using the Thinking Aloud technique and questionnaires) has been carried out with a small user group (n=9) to check whether interoperable device data and context information improved the usability and safety of the clinical processes. Inside the demonstrator OR at the Chair of Medical Engineering (RWTH Aachen University) surgeons and anesthesiologists tested and evaluated different interfaces for OR procedures. During the formative evaluation, interfaces inside a remote SDC workstation were tested for: OR-Light, OR-Table, Video-Switch, High Frequency Cutting device and a navigation interface in combination with a standalone tracking system and a universal foot switch. The results were very promising and showed that most interfaces had a high degree of usability. Potential for improvement has been identified in the handling, comprehensibility and discernibility of the navigation system. In a second part, the developed processes for OR-optimization were discussed and evaluated. The clinical staff (n=9) reported that they need to gather information from various sources and systems during surgery (Ø 4.63 out of 5 on a Likert scale) and that repeated recordings of redundant information into multiple protocols is also required. They supported the access, availability and integration of device context information inside clinical processes. All clinical users agreed that utilizing automatic documentation through interoperable medical devices can save valuable time (Ø 4,85 of 5). A concept, in which workflow step specific device settings were suggested, was met with approval but also with criticism. The users saw benefits for time saving and standardization purposes, but also drawbacks for possible dependency and less independent thinking. The statement “The collected data helps to build up a database, on which OR-management can make more efficient decisions” was also met with approval (Ø 4,88 of 5). Interoperable medical devices (using ISO IEE 11073 SDC) can be used to create a useful data base and to support time and resource savings and helps to conduct efficient decisions inside and outside the OR. User interfaces were displayed and evaluated in combination with process supporting data. Workflow specific suggestions for device property changes were declared as helpful, although concerns have been expressed (see above). We showed that interoperable SDC medical device data and context information can be used to improve and support clinical processes.","PeriodicalId":389399,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare and Medical Devices","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability evaluation of a process optimized integrated workstation based on the IEEE 11073 SDC standard\",\"authors\":\"O. Yilmaz, K. Radermacher, F. Beger, Jonas Roth, A. Janß\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1003481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several studies have identified that the Operating Room (OR) is costly to maintain, but also the most profit generating department. The 2019 approved ISO IEEE 11073 SDC family defines a manufacturer independent communication standard, which creates open interoperability in the OR and clinic for the first time. Using SDC, medical device data can be collected and used for display on a central cockpit, documentation purposes during an ongoing operation and also be streamed outside the OR. The goal of this research was to analyze and evaluate how medical device data and context information (current workflow step, location, patient, operator) could be used inside and outside the OR (e.g., maintenance and reparation) to improve clinical processes and benefit patient care. We also analyzed if the availability of such information might affect the efficiency and safety of patient care. A process analysis has been performed with clinical staff from the Uniklinik RWTH Aachen. The planning procedure of the OR management has been discussed and clinical use cases have been discussed with nurses, surgeons and anesthesiologists. Potential improvements using interoperable device data have been developed and corresponding interactive functional models have been implemented and discussed with the user groups. After several iterations, these concepts were implemented as part of surgical, anesthesia and OR management workstations. A formative usability evaluation (using the Thinking Aloud technique and questionnaires) has been carried out with a small user group (n=9) to check whether interoperable device data and context information improved the usability and safety of the clinical processes. Inside the demonstrator OR at the Chair of Medical Engineering (RWTH Aachen University) surgeons and anesthesiologists tested and evaluated different interfaces for OR procedures. During the formative evaluation, interfaces inside a remote SDC workstation were tested for: OR-Light, OR-Table, Video-Switch, High Frequency Cutting device and a navigation interface in combination with a standalone tracking system and a universal foot switch. The results were very promising and showed that most interfaces had a high degree of usability. Potential for improvement has been identified in the handling, comprehensibility and discernibility of the navigation system. In a second part, the developed processes for OR-optimization were discussed and evaluated. The clinical staff (n=9) reported that they need to gather information from various sources and systems during surgery (Ø 4.63 out of 5 on a Likert scale) and that repeated recordings of redundant information into multiple protocols is also required. They supported the access, availability and integration of device context information inside clinical processes. All clinical users agreed that utilizing automatic documentation through interoperable medical devices can save valuable time (Ø 4,85 of 5). A concept, in which workflow step specific device settings were suggested, was met with approval but also with criticism. The users saw benefits for time saving and standardization purposes, but also drawbacks for possible dependency and less independent thinking. The statement “The collected data helps to build up a database, on which OR-management can make more efficient decisions” was also met with approval (Ø 4,88 of 5). Interoperable medical devices (using ISO IEE 11073 SDC) can be used to create a useful data base and to support time and resource savings and helps to conduct efficient decisions inside and outside the OR. User interfaces were displayed and evaluated in combination with process supporting data. Workflow specific suggestions for device property changes were declared as helpful, although concerns have been expressed (see above). We showed that interoperable SDC medical device data and context information can be used to improve and support clinical processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":389399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare and Medical Devices\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare and Medical Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare and Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
几项研究表明,手术室(OR)的维护成本很高,但也是最能产生利润的部门。2019年批准的ISO IEEE 11073 SDC系列定义了一个独立于制造商的通信标准,首次在手术室和诊所中创建了开放的互操作性。使用SDC,可以收集医疗设备数据并用于在中央驾驶舱上显示,在正在进行的操作期间用于记录目的,也可以在手术室外传输。本研究的目的是分析和评估医疗设备数据和上下文信息(当前工作流程步骤、位置、患者、操作员)如何在手术室内外(例如维护和维修)使用,以改善临床流程并使患者护理受益。我们还分析了这些信息的可用性是否会影响患者护理的效率和安全性。与亚琛工业大学Uniklinik的临床工作人员一起进行了过程分析。讨论了手术室管理的计划程序,并与护士、外科医生和麻醉师讨论了临床用例。已经开发了使用可互操作设备数据的潜在改进,并且已经实现了相应的交互式功能模型,并与用户组进行了讨论。经过几次迭代,这些概念被实现为手术、麻醉和手术室管理工作站的一部分。对一小群用户(n=9)进行了形成性可用性评估(使用Thinking Aloud技术和问卷调查),以检查可互操作的设备数据和上下文信息是否提高了临床过程的可用性和安全性。在医学工程主席(亚琛工业大学)的示范手术室里,外科医生和麻醉师测试和评估了手术室手术的不同接口。在形成性评估期间,对远程SDC工作站内部的接口进行了测试:OR-Light, OR-Table, Video-Switch, High - Frequency Cutting device和一个结合独立跟踪系统和通用脚踏开关的导航接口。结果非常令人鼓舞,并表明大多数界面都具有高度的可用性。已确定在导航系统的处理、可理解性和可识别性方面有改进的潜力。在第二部分中,讨论和评估了开发的or优化流程。临床工作人员(n=9)报告说,他们需要在手术期间从各种来源和系统收集信息(Ø 4.63(李克特量表5分)),并且还需要将冗余信息重复记录到多个协议中。他们支持临床流程中设备上下文信息的访问、可用性和集成。所有临床用户都同意,通过可互操作的医疗设备使用自动文档可以节省宝贵的时间(Ø 4,85 of 5)。一个建议工作流步骤特定设备设置的概念得到了批准,但也受到了批评。用户看到了节省时间和标准化的好处,但也看到了可能的依赖性和较少独立思考的缺点。声明“收集的数据有助于建立一个数据库,在此基础上手术室管理层可以做出更有效的决策”也得到了批准(Ø 4,88 of 5)。可互操作的医疗设备(使用ISO IEE 11073 SDC)可用于创建有用的数据库,支持节省时间和资源,并有助于在手术室内外进行有效的决策。结合过程支持数据显示和评估用户界面。对于设备属性更改的工作流特定建议被声明为有帮助的,尽管已经表达了关注(见上文)。我们展示了可互操作的SDC医疗设备数据和上下文信息可用于改进和支持临床流程。
Usability evaluation of a process optimized integrated workstation based on the IEEE 11073 SDC standard
Several studies have identified that the Operating Room (OR) is costly to maintain, but also the most profit generating department. The 2019 approved ISO IEEE 11073 SDC family defines a manufacturer independent communication standard, which creates open interoperability in the OR and clinic for the first time. Using SDC, medical device data can be collected and used for display on a central cockpit, documentation purposes during an ongoing operation and also be streamed outside the OR. The goal of this research was to analyze and evaluate how medical device data and context information (current workflow step, location, patient, operator) could be used inside and outside the OR (e.g., maintenance and reparation) to improve clinical processes and benefit patient care. We also analyzed if the availability of such information might affect the efficiency and safety of patient care. A process analysis has been performed with clinical staff from the Uniklinik RWTH Aachen. The planning procedure of the OR management has been discussed and clinical use cases have been discussed with nurses, surgeons and anesthesiologists. Potential improvements using interoperable device data have been developed and corresponding interactive functional models have been implemented and discussed with the user groups. After several iterations, these concepts were implemented as part of surgical, anesthesia and OR management workstations. A formative usability evaluation (using the Thinking Aloud technique and questionnaires) has been carried out with a small user group (n=9) to check whether interoperable device data and context information improved the usability and safety of the clinical processes. Inside the demonstrator OR at the Chair of Medical Engineering (RWTH Aachen University) surgeons and anesthesiologists tested and evaluated different interfaces for OR procedures. During the formative evaluation, interfaces inside a remote SDC workstation were tested for: OR-Light, OR-Table, Video-Switch, High Frequency Cutting device and a navigation interface in combination with a standalone tracking system and a universal foot switch. The results were very promising and showed that most interfaces had a high degree of usability. Potential for improvement has been identified in the handling, comprehensibility and discernibility of the navigation system. In a second part, the developed processes for OR-optimization were discussed and evaluated. The clinical staff (n=9) reported that they need to gather information from various sources and systems during surgery (Ø 4.63 out of 5 on a Likert scale) and that repeated recordings of redundant information into multiple protocols is also required. They supported the access, availability and integration of device context information inside clinical processes. All clinical users agreed that utilizing automatic documentation through interoperable medical devices can save valuable time (Ø 4,85 of 5). A concept, in which workflow step specific device settings were suggested, was met with approval but also with criticism. The users saw benefits for time saving and standardization purposes, but also drawbacks for possible dependency and less independent thinking. The statement “The collected data helps to build up a database, on which OR-management can make more efficient decisions” was also met with approval (Ø 4,88 of 5). Interoperable medical devices (using ISO IEE 11073 SDC) can be used to create a useful data base and to support time and resource savings and helps to conduct efficient decisions inside and outside the OR. User interfaces were displayed and evaluated in combination with process supporting data. Workflow specific suggestions for device property changes were declared as helpful, although concerns have been expressed (see above). We showed that interoperable SDC medical device data and context information can be used to improve and support clinical processes.