准直器对DaT-SPECT成像的影响:蒙特卡罗模拟研究

Akihiko Takahashi, K. Himuro, K. Funada, M. Sasaki, S. Baba
{"title":"准直器对DaT-SPECT成像的影响:蒙特卡罗模拟研究","authors":"Akihiko Takahashi, K. Himuro, K. Funada, M. Sasaki, S. Baba","doi":"10.31487/j.rdi.2019.04.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the collimator in viewing the dopamine\ntransporter, using 123I ioflupane single-photon emission computed tomography (DaT-SPECT) images\nutilizing a Monte Carlo simulation.\nMethods: For the purpose of this study, the Monte Carlo simulation of electrons and photons (MCEP)-\nSPECT was used. A numerical phantom was created from a real basal ganglia phantom and installed within\nthe code. The specific binding ratios (SBRs) were 5.03 and 2.01 for the background concentration of 7.44\nkBq/mL or 7.04 and 3.03 for a background concentration of 5.56 kBq/mL. The simulated images were\nevaluated using a recovery coefficient (RC). Initially, we simulated the performance of 14 collimators\nwithout resolution correction to investigate the impact of the collimator dimension. The effects of two\nresolution correction methods (collimator broad correction (CBC) and three-dimensional frequency–\ndistance relationship (3D-FDR)) on two reconstruction methods (Ordered-Subsets Expectation\nMaximization (OSEM) and Filtered back projection (FBP)) was assessed for collimators that demonstrated\na better RC value.\nResults: Five low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimators and one medium-energy general-purpose\n(MEGP) collimator demonstrated superior RC values. These collimators had a high aspect ratio (holelength/hole-diameter). The maximum RC value without resolution correction was 64.9% when the image\nwas reconstructed with OSEM. The RC value improved to 79.7% when the resolution correction of CBC\nwas applied. When the resolution collection was applied, the RCs improved by approximately 1.2 times\nwhen compared against those without the resolution correction. In terms of the reconstruction method, the\nRC obtained using OSEM was statistically insignificant when compared to the RC using FBP. The\ndifference in the RC value with collimators decreased according to resolution correction.\nConclusion: The LEHR collimator with a high aspect ratio, and the OSEM with spatial resolution correction\nwere confirmed to be appropriate for DaT-SPECT imaging. In terms of the reconstruction method, CBC\nwas more favourable than FDR.","PeriodicalId":308916,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Collimator on DaT-SPECT Imaging: Monte Carlo Simulation Study\",\"authors\":\"Akihiko Takahashi, K. Himuro, K. Funada, M. Sasaki, S. Baba\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/j.rdi.2019.04.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the collimator in viewing the dopamine\\ntransporter, using 123I ioflupane single-photon emission computed tomography (DaT-SPECT) images\\nutilizing a Monte Carlo simulation.\\nMethods: For the purpose of this study, the Monte Carlo simulation of electrons and photons (MCEP)-\\nSPECT was used. A numerical phantom was created from a real basal ganglia phantom and installed within\\nthe code. The specific binding ratios (SBRs) were 5.03 and 2.01 for the background concentration of 7.44\\nkBq/mL or 7.04 and 3.03 for a background concentration of 5.56 kBq/mL. The simulated images were\\nevaluated using a recovery coefficient (RC). Initially, we simulated the performance of 14 collimators\\nwithout resolution correction to investigate the impact of the collimator dimension. The effects of two\\nresolution correction methods (collimator broad correction (CBC) and three-dimensional frequency–\\ndistance relationship (3D-FDR)) on two reconstruction methods (Ordered-Subsets Expectation\\nMaximization (OSEM) and Filtered back projection (FBP)) was assessed for collimators that demonstrated\\na better RC value.\\nResults: Five low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimators and one medium-energy general-purpose\\n(MEGP) collimator demonstrated superior RC values. These collimators had a high aspect ratio (holelength/hole-diameter). The maximum RC value without resolution correction was 64.9% when the image\\nwas reconstructed with OSEM. The RC value improved to 79.7% when the resolution correction of CBC\\nwas applied. When the resolution collection was applied, the RCs improved by approximately 1.2 times\\nwhen compared against those without the resolution correction. In terms of the reconstruction method, the\\nRC obtained using OSEM was statistically insignificant when compared to the RC using FBP. The\\ndifference in the RC value with collimators decreased according to resolution correction.\\nConclusion: The LEHR collimator with a high aspect ratio, and the OSEM with spatial resolution correction\\nwere confirmed to be appropriate for DaT-SPECT imaging. In terms of the reconstruction method, CBC\\nwas more favourable than FDR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.rdi.2019.04.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.rdi.2019.04.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是利用蒙特卡罗模拟的123I碘氟烷单光子发射计算机断层扫描(pat - spect)图像,评估准直仪对观察多巴胺转运体的影响。方法:采用Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon (MCEP)-SPECT进行研究。从真实的基底神经节幻像中创建了一个数值幻像,并将其安装在代码中。背景浓度为7.44kBq/mL时,特异性结合比分别为5.03和2.01,背景浓度为5.56 kBq/mL时,特异性结合比分别为7.04和3.03。利用恢复系数(RC)对模拟图像进行评价。首先,我们模拟了14个没有分辨率校正的准直器的性能,以研究准直器尺寸的影响。研究了两种分辨率校正方法(准直器宽校正(CBC)和三维频率-距离关系(3D-FDR))对两种重建方法(有序子集期望最大化(OSEM)和滤波后投影(FBP))的影响,并对具有较好RC值的准直器进行了评估。结果:5个低能量高分辨率(LEHR)准直器和1个中等能量通用型(MEGP)准直器显示出优越的RC值。这些准直器具有很高的纵横比(孔长/孔直径)。在不进行分辨率校正的情况下,用OSEM重建图像的最大RC值为64.9%。采用cbc分辨率校正后,RC值提高到79.7%。当应用分辨率收集时,与没有分辨率校正的RCs相比,RCs提高了约1.2倍。在重建方法方面,与使用FBP的RC相比,使用OSEM获得的theRC在统计学上不显著。随着分辨率的修正,准直器的RC值差异减小。结论:高宽高比的LEHR准直器和空间分辨率校正的OSEM适合于pet - spect成像。在重建方法上,cbc优于FDR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Collimator on DaT-SPECT Imaging: Monte Carlo Simulation Study
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the collimator in viewing the dopamine transporter, using 123I ioflupane single-photon emission computed tomography (DaT-SPECT) images utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation. Methods: For the purpose of this study, the Monte Carlo simulation of electrons and photons (MCEP)- SPECT was used. A numerical phantom was created from a real basal ganglia phantom and installed within the code. The specific binding ratios (SBRs) were 5.03 and 2.01 for the background concentration of 7.44 kBq/mL or 7.04 and 3.03 for a background concentration of 5.56 kBq/mL. The simulated images were evaluated using a recovery coefficient (RC). Initially, we simulated the performance of 14 collimators without resolution correction to investigate the impact of the collimator dimension. The effects of two resolution correction methods (collimator broad correction (CBC) and three-dimensional frequency– distance relationship (3D-FDR)) on two reconstruction methods (Ordered-Subsets Expectation Maximization (OSEM) and Filtered back projection (FBP)) was assessed for collimators that demonstrated a better RC value. Results: Five low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimators and one medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP) collimator demonstrated superior RC values. These collimators had a high aspect ratio (holelength/hole-diameter). The maximum RC value without resolution correction was 64.9% when the image was reconstructed with OSEM. The RC value improved to 79.7% when the resolution correction of CBC was applied. When the resolution collection was applied, the RCs improved by approximately 1.2 times when compared against those without the resolution correction. In terms of the reconstruction method, the RC obtained using OSEM was statistically insignificant when compared to the RC using FBP. The difference in the RC value with collimators decreased according to resolution correction. Conclusion: The LEHR collimator with a high aspect ratio, and the OSEM with spatial resolution correction were confirmed to be appropriate for DaT-SPECT imaging. In terms of the reconstruction method, CBC was more favourable than FDR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Size Specific Dose Estimate in Abdominal Computed Tomography by AAPM TG Report-204 and AAPM TG Report-220 A Potential Solution to Assess the Absorbed Dose at Any Point in Breast During Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Imaging Using a Novel Monte Carlo Simulation Software Quantitative Assessment of Iodine Intensity of Different Types of Lesions in the Low-Energy (LE) Images of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Radiological Correlation of Negative Appendectomies: A Clinical Audit A Short Review of Benefits of Using Chest CT Characteristics for Early diagnoses to Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1