揭开重复数据删除的神秘面纱

N. Mandagere, Pin Zhou, Mark A. Smith, Sandeep Uttamchandani
{"title":"揭开重复数据删除的神秘面纱","authors":"N. Mandagere, Pin Zhou, Mark A. Smith, Sandeep Uttamchandani","doi":"10.1145/1462735.1462739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effectiveness and tradeoffs of deduplication technologies are not well understood -- vendors tout Deduplication as a \"silver bullet\" that can help any enterprise optimize its deployed storage capacity. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive taxonomy and experimental evaluation using real-world data. While the rate of change of data on a day-to-day basis has the greatest influence on the duplication in backup data, we investigate the duplication inherent in this data, independent of rate of change of data or backup schedule or backup algorithm used. Our experimental results show that between different deduplication techniques the space savings varies by about 30%, the CPU usage differs by almost 6 times and the time to reconstruct a deduplicated file can vary by more than 15 times.","PeriodicalId":340887,"journal":{"name":"Companion '08","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"150","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demystifying data deduplication\",\"authors\":\"N. Mandagere, Pin Zhou, Mark A. Smith, Sandeep Uttamchandani\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1462735.1462739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effectiveness and tradeoffs of deduplication technologies are not well understood -- vendors tout Deduplication as a \\\"silver bullet\\\" that can help any enterprise optimize its deployed storage capacity. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive taxonomy and experimental evaluation using real-world data. While the rate of change of data on a day-to-day basis has the greatest influence on the duplication in backup data, we investigate the duplication inherent in this data, independent of rate of change of data or backup schedule or backup algorithm used. Our experimental results show that between different deduplication techniques the space savings varies by about 30%, the CPU usage differs by almost 6 times and the time to reconstruct a deduplicated file can vary by more than 15 times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Companion '08\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"150\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Companion '08\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1462735.1462739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion '08","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1462735.1462739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 150

摘要

重复数据删除技术的有效性和权衡还没有得到很好的理解——供应商将重复数据删除吹捧为可以帮助任何企业优化其部署的存储容量的“银弹”。本文旨在利用真实世界的数据提供一个全面的分类和实验评估。虽然每天数据的变化率对备份数据的重复影响最大,但我们研究了这些数据固有的重复,而不依赖于数据的变化率、备份计划或使用的备份算法。我们的实验结果表明,在不同的重复数据删除技术之间,节省的空间相差约30%,CPU使用率相差近6倍,重建重复数据删除文件的时间相差超过15倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demystifying data deduplication
Effectiveness and tradeoffs of deduplication technologies are not well understood -- vendors tout Deduplication as a "silver bullet" that can help any enterprise optimize its deployed storage capacity. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive taxonomy and experimental evaluation using real-world data. While the rate of change of data on a day-to-day basis has the greatest influence on the duplication in backup data, we investigate the duplication inherent in this data, independent of rate of change of data or backup schedule or backup algorithm used. Our experimental results show that between different deduplication techniques the space savings varies by about 30%, the CPU usage differs by almost 6 times and the time to reconstruct a deduplicated file can vary by more than 15 times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing remote monitoring to the PeerHood middleware Using the service coroner tool for diagnosing stale references in the OSGi platform Event-based data control in healthcare FOREVER: Fault/intrusiOn REmoVal through Evolution & Recovery A flexible architecture for mobile collaboration services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1