实验系统:

M. Schwab
{"title":"实验系统:","authors":"M. Schwab","doi":"10.2307/J.CTVC771TM.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entry Encyclopedia for the History of the Life Sciences In the autobiographical report on his laboratory work at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, the French molecular biologist François Jacob remarked a decade and a half ago: \" In biology, any study … begins with the choice of a 'system.' Everything depends on this choice: the range within which the experimenter can move, the character of the questions he is able to ask, and often also the answers he can give \" (Jacob 1987, p. 261). In the biological research literature, the notion of \" experimental system \" for the characterization of experimental arrangements has been in regular use since the first decades of the twentieth century, in particular in connection with the establishment of a vigorous in vitro biology (see, e.g., Gale and Folkes 1954, p. 1224) and with the coming into use of a variety of model organisms, especially bacteria and viruses, two features of experimental systems to which I will come back later. When Jacob speaks about \" system, \" the term is used in exactly this sense. A comparison may help set the stage. Two centuries ago, toward the end of the eighteenth century, when natural historians and biologists talked about \" systems, \" they meant systems of thought such as the \" system of the eggs \" or the \" system of the sperms \" with respect to the then concurring theories of generation, into which, sporadically, experimental arguments were inserted. Two hundred years later, it is experimental systems that determine the research context into which theorems can eventually become inserted.","PeriodicalId":438413,"journal":{"name":"Futures of the Contemporary","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Systems:\",\"authors\":\"M. Schwab\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/J.CTVC771TM.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Entry Encyclopedia for the History of the Life Sciences In the autobiographical report on his laboratory work at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, the French molecular biologist François Jacob remarked a decade and a half ago: \\\" In biology, any study … begins with the choice of a 'system.' Everything depends on this choice: the range within which the experimenter can move, the character of the questions he is able to ask, and often also the answers he can give \\\" (Jacob 1987, p. 261). In the biological research literature, the notion of \\\" experimental system \\\" for the characterization of experimental arrangements has been in regular use since the first decades of the twentieth century, in particular in connection with the establishment of a vigorous in vitro biology (see, e.g., Gale and Folkes 1954, p. 1224) and with the coming into use of a variety of model organisms, especially bacteria and viruses, two features of experimental systems to which I will come back later. When Jacob speaks about \\\" system, \\\" the term is used in exactly this sense. A comparison may help set the stage. Two centuries ago, toward the end of the eighteenth century, when natural historians and biologists talked about \\\" systems, \\\" they meant systems of thought such as the \\\" system of the eggs \\\" or the \\\" system of the sperms \\\" with respect to the then concurring theories of generation, into which, sporadically, experimental arguments were inserted. Two hundred years later, it is experimental systems that determine the research context into which theorems can eventually become inserted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures of the Contemporary\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures of the Contemporary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTVC771TM.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures of the Contemporary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTVC771TM.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

15年前,法国分子生物学家弗朗索瓦·雅各布在他在巴黎巴斯德研究所的实验室工作的自传报告中说:“在生物学中,任何研究……都是从选择一个‘系统’开始的。”一切都取决于这种选择:实验者可以移动的范围,他能够提出的问题的性质,以及他通常可以给出的答案”(Jacob 1987, p. 261)。在生物研究文献,“实验系统”的概念表征的实验安排在常规使用自20世纪的头几十年,特别是在与建立一个有力的体外生物学(见,例如,盖尔和民间1954,p . 1224)和进入各种生物模型的使用,尤其是细菌和病毒,两种特性的实验系统,我以后会回来。当Jacob谈到“系统”时,这个术语就是在这个意义上使用的。一个比较可能有助于奠定基础。两个世纪以前,也就是接近十八世纪末的时候,当自然历史学家和生物学家谈论“系统”时,他们指的是思想系统,比如“卵子系统”或“精子系统”,这些思想系统与当时流行的生殖理论有关,偶尔会插入实验论点。两百年后的今天,正是实验系统决定了理论最终可以被引入的研究背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental Systems:
Entry Encyclopedia for the History of the Life Sciences In the autobiographical report on his laboratory work at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, the French molecular biologist François Jacob remarked a decade and a half ago: " In biology, any study … begins with the choice of a 'system.' Everything depends on this choice: the range within which the experimenter can move, the character of the questions he is able to ask, and often also the answers he can give " (Jacob 1987, p. 261). In the biological research literature, the notion of " experimental system " for the characterization of experimental arrangements has been in regular use since the first decades of the twentieth century, in particular in connection with the establishment of a vigorous in vitro biology (see, e.g., Gale and Folkes 1954, p. 1224) and with the coming into use of a variety of model organisms, especially bacteria and viruses, two features of experimental systems to which I will come back later. When Jacob speaks about " system, " the term is used in exactly this sense. A comparison may help set the stage. Two centuries ago, toward the end of the eighteenth century, when natural historians and biologists talked about " systems, " they meant systems of thought such as the " system of the eggs " or the " system of the sperms " with respect to the then concurring theories of generation, into which, sporadically, experimental arguments were inserted. Two hundred years later, it is experimental systems that determine the research context into which theorems can eventually become inserted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Working the Contemporary: Back Matter Untimeliness in Contemporary Times On Aesthetic Experience as Anachronic Experience The Question of the Contemporary in Agamben, Nancy, Danto:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1