{"title":"附录a .","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110593808-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proof of Proposition 1: We consider a policy x that maintains the ordering of individuals’ willingness-to-pay and thus the corresponding surplus from buying insurance conditional on the share of insured individuals Q (x). We denote by w̃ (x) an individual’s net willingness-to-pay and the corresponding density by g. For the marginal individual, the net willingness-to-pay equals w̃ (x) = P (x) = D−1 (Q (x) ;x), while the original willingness-to-pay equals w̃ (0) = D−1 (Q (x) ; 0). Equilibrium welfare for policy x (not accounting for the budgetary cost) equals","PeriodicalId":189710,"journal":{"name":"Random Signal Analysis","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A. Appendix\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110593808-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proof of Proposition 1: We consider a policy x that maintains the ordering of individuals’ willingness-to-pay and thus the corresponding surplus from buying insurance conditional on the share of insured individuals Q (x). We denote by w̃ (x) an individual’s net willingness-to-pay and the corresponding density by g. For the marginal individual, the net willingness-to-pay equals w̃ (x) = P (x) = D−1 (Q (x) ;x), while the original willingness-to-pay equals w̃ (0) = D−1 (Q (x) ; 0). Equilibrium welfare for policy x (not accounting for the budgetary cost) equals\",\"PeriodicalId\":189710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Random Signal Analysis\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Random Signal Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110593808-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Random Signal Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110593808-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Proof of Proposition 1: We consider a policy x that maintains the ordering of individuals’ willingness-to-pay and thus the corresponding surplus from buying insurance conditional on the share of insured individuals Q (x). We denote by w̃ (x) an individual’s net willingness-to-pay and the corresponding density by g. For the marginal individual, the net willingness-to-pay equals w̃ (x) = P (x) = D−1 (Q (x) ;x), while the original willingness-to-pay equals w̃ (0) = D−1 (Q (x) ; 0). Equilibrium welfare for policy x (not accounting for the budgetary cost) equals