什么?——德国一家有限公司在明镜公司的考虑中发挥作用

Paul Harenberg
{"title":"什么?——德国一家有限公司在明镜公司的考虑中发挥作用","authors":"Paul Harenberg","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-4-393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change, (the social implications of) digitization and a stark contrast the between advancing globalization of (financial) markets and politically induced trade warfare shape the global economic and regulatory discourse. An intuitively well- founded demand that is regularly voiced in the context of corresponding debates is that businesses should put more emphasis on ethically responsible conduct and demonstrate more social commitment. Nevertheless, it seems questionable whether this assessment is, in fact, sufficiently substantiated in order to withstand a nuanced scholarly analysis. Large, multinational corporations undeniably possess the ability to exert considerable influence - both positive and negative - on societal progress through their decision-making. There are good arguments, however, to suggest that normatively desirable objectives are actually best achieved by subscribing to a contemporary interpretation of the traditional shareholder value doctrine - and not via the intuitive path of calling on the corporate form to pursue outright societal objectives by way of regulation. In any case, the contemporary discourse shows this: the functional positioning of large corporations in the 21st century-context of Fridays for Future and “homeland first”-politics requires a fundamental reassessment. This paper thus pursues the desirable aim of mapping the legal and economic foundation of the firm - exemplified by the German stock corporation - in its newer and most recent form, thereby setting the stage and providing thought-provoking impulses for future research.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporations for Future? – Die Zielfunktion der deutschen Aktiengesellschaft im Spiegel unternehmenstheoretischer Überlegungen\",\"authors\":\"Paul Harenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-4-393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Climate change, (the social implications of) digitization and a stark contrast the between advancing globalization of (financial) markets and politically induced trade warfare shape the global economic and regulatory discourse. An intuitively well- founded demand that is regularly voiced in the context of corresponding debates is that businesses should put more emphasis on ethically responsible conduct and demonstrate more social commitment. Nevertheless, it seems questionable whether this assessment is, in fact, sufficiently substantiated in order to withstand a nuanced scholarly analysis. Large, multinational corporations undeniably possess the ability to exert considerable influence - both positive and negative - on societal progress through their decision-making. There are good arguments, however, to suggest that normatively desirable objectives are actually best achieved by subscribing to a contemporary interpretation of the traditional shareholder value doctrine - and not via the intuitive path of calling on the corporate form to pursue outright societal objectives by way of regulation. In any case, the contemporary discourse shows this: the functional positioning of large corporations in the 21st century-context of Fridays for Future and “homeland first”-politics requires a fundamental reassessment. This paper thus pursues the desirable aim of mapping the legal and economic foundation of the firm - exemplified by the German stock corporation - in its newer and most recent form, thereby setting the stage and providing thought-provoking impulses for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-4-393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-4-393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化、数字化的社会影响以及(金融)市场全球化进程与政治引发的贸易战之间的鲜明对比,塑造了全球经济和监管话语。在相应的辩论背景下,经常提出的一个直观的、有充分根据的要求是,企业应该更加重视道德上负责任的行为,并表现出更多的社会承诺。然而,这一评估是否有足够的证据来经得起细致入微的学术分析,似乎值得怀疑。不可否认,大型跨国公司有能力通过其决策对社会进步施加相当大的积极和消极影响。然而,有很好的论据表明,在规范上理想的目标实际上最好是通过接受对传统股东价值原则的当代解释来实现的,而不是通过呼吁公司形式通过监管来追求直接的社会目标的直觉途径。无论如何,当代话语表明了这一点:大公司在21世纪的功能定位——周五为未来和“国土第一”——政治需要从根本上重新评估。因此,本文追求的理想目标是以更新和最新的形式描绘公司的法律和经济基础-以德国股份公司为例,从而为未来的研究奠定基础并提供发人深省的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporations for Future? – Die Zielfunktion der deutschen Aktiengesellschaft im Spiegel unternehmenstheoretischer Überlegungen
Climate change, (the social implications of) digitization and a stark contrast the between advancing globalization of (financial) markets and politically induced trade warfare shape the global economic and regulatory discourse. An intuitively well- founded demand that is regularly voiced in the context of corresponding debates is that businesses should put more emphasis on ethically responsible conduct and demonstrate more social commitment. Nevertheless, it seems questionable whether this assessment is, in fact, sufficiently substantiated in order to withstand a nuanced scholarly analysis. Large, multinational corporations undeniably possess the ability to exert considerable influence - both positive and negative - on societal progress through their decision-making. There are good arguments, however, to suggest that normatively desirable objectives are actually best achieved by subscribing to a contemporary interpretation of the traditional shareholder value doctrine - and not via the intuitive path of calling on the corporate form to pursue outright societal objectives by way of regulation. In any case, the contemporary discourse shows this: the functional positioning of large corporations in the 21st century-context of Fridays for Future and “homeland first”-politics requires a fundamental reassessment. This paper thus pursues the desirable aim of mapping the legal and economic foundation of the firm - exemplified by the German stock corporation - in its newer and most recent form, thereby setting the stage and providing thought-provoking impulses for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diskriminierung wegen der sozialen Klasse durch Alkoholverbote? Health as an enforceable positive right: the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court’s case law on the access to medicines Resilienz des Grundgesetzes im Zeitalter des Populismus Das grundfreiheitliche Gebot „Du sollst nicht diskriminieren“ Das Recht der Nachrichtendienste: Missstände, Entwicklungen und Perspektiven eines Rechtsgebiets in der Findungsphase
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1