描述持续集成的影响:来自250多个开源和专有项目的经验结果

A. Rahman, Amritanshu Agrawal, R. Krishna, Alexander Sobran
{"title":"描述持续集成的影响:来自250多个开源和专有项目的经验结果","authors":"A. Rahman, Amritanshu Agrawal, R. Krishna, Alexander Sobran","doi":"10.1145/3278142.3278149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continuous integration (CI) tools integrate code changes by automatically compiling, building, and executing test cases upon submission of code changes. Use of CI tools is getting increasingly popular, yet how proprietary projects reap the benefits of CI remains unknown. To investigate the influence of CI on software development, we analyze 150 open source software (OSS) projects, and 123 proprietary projects. For OSS projects, we observe the expected benefits after CI adoption, e.g., improvements in bug and issue resolution. However, for the proprietary projects, we cannot make similar observations. Our findings indicate that only adoption of CI might not be enough to the improve software development process. CI can be effective for software development if practitioners use CI's feedback mechanism efficiently, by applying the practice of making frequent commits. For our set of proprietary projects we observe practitioners commit less frequently, and hence not use CI effectively for obtaining feedback on the submitted code changes. Based on our findings we recommend industry practitioners to adopt the best practices of CI to reap the benefits of CI tools for example, making frequent commits.","PeriodicalId":108238,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software Analytics","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing the influence of continuous integration: empirical results from 250+ open source and proprietary projects\",\"authors\":\"A. Rahman, Amritanshu Agrawal, R. Krishna, Alexander Sobran\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3278142.3278149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Continuous integration (CI) tools integrate code changes by automatically compiling, building, and executing test cases upon submission of code changes. Use of CI tools is getting increasingly popular, yet how proprietary projects reap the benefits of CI remains unknown. To investigate the influence of CI on software development, we analyze 150 open source software (OSS) projects, and 123 proprietary projects. For OSS projects, we observe the expected benefits after CI adoption, e.g., improvements in bug and issue resolution. However, for the proprietary projects, we cannot make similar observations. Our findings indicate that only adoption of CI might not be enough to the improve software development process. CI can be effective for software development if practitioners use CI's feedback mechanism efficiently, by applying the practice of making frequent commits. For our set of proprietary projects we observe practitioners commit less frequently, and hence not use CI effectively for obtaining feedback on the submitted code changes. Based on our findings we recommend industry practitioners to adopt the best practices of CI to reap the benefits of CI tools for example, making frequent commits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software Analytics\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software Analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3278142.3278149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3278142.3278149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

持续集成(CI)工具通过在提交代码更改时自动编译、构建和执行测试用例来集成代码更改。CI工具的使用正变得越来越流行,但是私有项目如何从CI中获益仍然是未知的。为了研究CI对软件开发的影响,我们分析了150个开源软件(OSS)项目和123个专有项目。对于OSS项目,我们观察到采用CI后的预期收益,例如,bug和问题解决方面的改进。然而,对于私有项目,我们不能做类似的观察。我们的研究结果表明,仅仅采用持续集成可能不足以改善软件开发过程。如果执行者通过应用频繁提交的实践,有效地使用CI的反馈机制,则CI对于软件开发是有效的。对于我们的一组专有项目,我们观察到执行者提交的频率较低,因此不能有效地使用CI来获得对提交的代码更改的反馈。根据我们的发现,我们建议行业从业者采用CI的最佳实践,以获得CI工具的好处,例如,频繁提交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing the influence of continuous integration: empirical results from 250+ open source and proprietary projects
Continuous integration (CI) tools integrate code changes by automatically compiling, building, and executing test cases upon submission of code changes. Use of CI tools is getting increasingly popular, yet how proprietary projects reap the benefits of CI remains unknown. To investigate the influence of CI on software development, we analyze 150 open source software (OSS) projects, and 123 proprietary projects. For OSS projects, we observe the expected benefits after CI adoption, e.g., improvements in bug and issue resolution. However, for the proprietary projects, we cannot make similar observations. Our findings indicate that only adoption of CI might not be enough to the improve software development process. CI can be effective for software development if practitioners use CI's feedback mechanism efficiently, by applying the practice of making frequent commits. For our set of proprietary projects we observe practitioners commit less frequently, and hence not use CI effectively for obtaining feedback on the submitted code changes. Based on our findings we recommend industry practitioners to adopt the best practices of CI to reap the benefits of CI tools for example, making frequent commits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards a framework for generating program dependence graphs from source code Differentially-private software analytics for mobile apps: opportunities and challenges Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software Analytics Facilitating feasibility analysis: the pilot defects prediction dataset maker Is one hyperparameter optimizer enough?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1