持续气道正压通气(CPAP)对75岁及以上患者的COVID-19治疗有效吗?呼吸道COVID-19 CPAP装置的第二波回顾性观察研究

H. Alexander, R. McGow, S. Makwana, S. Al-Hakeem, A. Adeyeye, A. Ashish
{"title":"持续气道正压通气(CPAP)对75岁及以上患者的COVID-19治疗有效吗?呼吸道COVID-19 CPAP装置的第二波回顾性观察研究","authors":"H. Alexander, R. McGow, S. Makwana, S. Al-Hakeem, A. Adeyeye, A. Ashish","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThere remains significant variation in treatment of COVID-19 associated respiratory failure. Although Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) has shown to improve outcome in single centre studies, inclusion criteria for commencement of CPAP varies significantly (Ashish et al., 2020;Nightingale et al., 2020). This respiratory-led ward-level dedicated CPAP unit provided CPAP to COVID-19 patients through the ‘second wave’. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and appropriateness of CPAP for COVID-19 management in an elderly population.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included all patients aged 75 and over who received CPAP for COVID-19 infection, admitted to a district general hospital between 1 October 2020 and 16 February 2021. Fifty-seven patients were included. Data were collected from computerised clinical notes for analysis.ResultsOf 57 patients (39 male and mean age 80), 47 (82.5%) patients died during admission or within 5 days of discharge. 10 (17.5%) patients survived to discharge. Non-survivors had a median CFS of 4;IQR 3–5, as did survivors (median CFS 4;IQR 3–4). Non-survivors had a median of 3 (IQR 2–4) significant comorbidities, and survivors had 2.5 (IQR 2–3.8). Median P/F (PaO2/FiO2) ratio prior to commencing CPAP was 10.5 (IQR 8.4–12.6) for non-survivors and 14.4 (IQR 12.9–18.8) for survivors. The odds of death were 6.8 (p value <0.01) in those with a severe P/F ratio (<13.3).ConclusionThis evidence indicates that CPAP used in patients aged 75 and over, particularly those with a severe P/F ratio prior to commencing CPAP, does not improve mortality. These findings can inform future decision-making and CPAP protocol development to potentially limit its use in this group. Further study of less invasive alternative management options, such as nasal high flow oxygen, is recommended.","PeriodicalId":143926,"journal":{"name":"Fighting back: optimising treatment for COVID-19","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P184 Is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) effective in the management of COVID-19 in patients aged 75 and over? A retrospective observational study of a respiratory COVID-19 CPAP unit through its second wave\",\"authors\":\"H. Alexander, R. McGow, S. Makwana, S. Al-Hakeem, A. Adeyeye, A. Ashish\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionThere remains significant variation in treatment of COVID-19 associated respiratory failure. Although Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) has shown to improve outcome in single centre studies, inclusion criteria for commencement of CPAP varies significantly (Ashish et al., 2020;Nightingale et al., 2020). This respiratory-led ward-level dedicated CPAP unit provided CPAP to COVID-19 patients through the ‘second wave’. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and appropriateness of CPAP for COVID-19 management in an elderly population.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included all patients aged 75 and over who received CPAP for COVID-19 infection, admitted to a district general hospital between 1 October 2020 and 16 February 2021. Fifty-seven patients were included. Data were collected from computerised clinical notes for analysis.ResultsOf 57 patients (39 male and mean age 80), 47 (82.5%) patients died during admission or within 5 days of discharge. 10 (17.5%) patients survived to discharge. Non-survivors had a median CFS of 4;IQR 3–5, as did survivors (median CFS 4;IQR 3–4). Non-survivors had a median of 3 (IQR 2–4) significant comorbidities, and survivors had 2.5 (IQR 2–3.8). Median P/F (PaO2/FiO2) ratio prior to commencing CPAP was 10.5 (IQR 8.4–12.6) for non-survivors and 14.4 (IQR 12.9–18.8) for survivors. The odds of death were 6.8 (p value <0.01) in those with a severe P/F ratio (<13.3).ConclusionThis evidence indicates that CPAP used in patients aged 75 and over, particularly those with a severe P/F ratio prior to commencing CPAP, does not improve mortality. These findings can inform future decision-making and CPAP protocol development to potentially limit its use in this group. Further study of less invasive alternative management options, such as nasal high flow oxygen, is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fighting back: optimising treatment for COVID-19\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fighting back: optimising treatment for COVID-19\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fighting back: optimising treatment for COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对COVID-19相关呼吸衰竭的治疗仍存在显著差异。尽管在单中心研究中,持续气道正压通气(CPAP)已显示出改善预后的效果,但开始使用CPAP的纳入标准差异很大(Ashish等,2020;Nightingale等,2020)。这个由呼吸引导的病房级专用CPAP单元通过“第二波”为COVID-19患者提供了CPAP。本研究旨在评估CPAP在老年人群COVID-19治疗中的有效性和适宜性。方法本回顾性观察性研究纳入了2020年10月1日至2021年2月16日期间在一家地区综合医院住院的所有75岁及以上接受CPAP治疗COVID-19感染的患者。纳入了57例患者。从计算机化的临床记录中收集数据进行分析。结果57例患者中,男性39例,平均年龄80岁,47例(82.5%)在入院或出院5天内死亡。10例(17.5%)存活出院。非幸存者的中位CFS为4;IQR为3-5,幸存者的中位CFS为4;IQR为3-4。非幸存者有3个(IQR 2-4)显著合并症,幸存者有2.5个(IQR 2-3.8)。开始CPAP前,非幸存者的中位P/F (PaO2/FiO2)比为10.5 (IQR 8.4-12.6),幸存者为14.4 (IQR 12.9-18.8)。严重p /F比(<13.3)者死亡几率为6.8 (p值<0.01)。结论:该证据表明,在75岁及以上的患者中使用CPAP,特别是那些在开始CPAP之前有严重P/F比的患者,并没有改善死亡率。这些发现可以为未来的决策和CPAP协议的制定提供信息,以潜在地限制其在该组中的使用。建议进一步研究侵入性较小的替代治疗方案,如鼻腔高流量氧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P184 Is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) effective in the management of COVID-19 in patients aged 75 and over? A retrospective observational study of a respiratory COVID-19 CPAP unit through its second wave
IntroductionThere remains significant variation in treatment of COVID-19 associated respiratory failure. Although Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) has shown to improve outcome in single centre studies, inclusion criteria for commencement of CPAP varies significantly (Ashish et al., 2020;Nightingale et al., 2020). This respiratory-led ward-level dedicated CPAP unit provided CPAP to COVID-19 patients through the ‘second wave’. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and appropriateness of CPAP for COVID-19 management in an elderly population.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included all patients aged 75 and over who received CPAP for COVID-19 infection, admitted to a district general hospital between 1 October 2020 and 16 February 2021. Fifty-seven patients were included. Data were collected from computerised clinical notes for analysis.ResultsOf 57 patients (39 male and mean age 80), 47 (82.5%) patients died during admission or within 5 days of discharge. 10 (17.5%) patients survived to discharge. Non-survivors had a median CFS of 4;IQR 3–5, as did survivors (median CFS 4;IQR 3–4). Non-survivors had a median of 3 (IQR 2–4) significant comorbidities, and survivors had 2.5 (IQR 2–3.8). Median P/F (PaO2/FiO2) ratio prior to commencing CPAP was 10.5 (IQR 8.4–12.6) for non-survivors and 14.4 (IQR 12.9–18.8) for survivors. The odds of death were 6.8 (p value <0.01) in those with a severe P/F ratio (<13.3).ConclusionThis evidence indicates that CPAP used in patients aged 75 and over, particularly those with a severe P/F ratio prior to commencing CPAP, does not improve mortality. These findings can inform future decision-making and CPAP protocol development to potentially limit its use in this group. Further study of less invasive alternative management options, such as nasal high flow oxygen, is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
P188 Tick tock...where and when can we give toc? Review of COVID-19 patients receiving tocilizumab in a non critical care setting P186 Single centre experience of tocilizumab in COVID 19 pneumonia P187 Clinical outcomes and treatment-related adverse events to tocilizumab in SARS-CoV-2 illness P184 Is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) effective in the management of COVID-19 in patients aged 75 and over? A retrospective observational study of a respiratory COVID-19 CPAP unit through its second wave P189 Use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in COVID-19 infection does not adversely affect clinical outcomes including need for non-invasive and invasive ventilation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1