2009年修订课程对初中英语教材语法模式的分析

Youn-A Kwon, Mun-koo Kang
{"title":"2009年修订课程对初中英语教材语法模式的分析","authors":"Youn-A Kwon, Mun-koo Kang","doi":"10.21742/AJEMR.2016.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to discover whether language form is appropriately reflected in English textbooks for middle school juniors through comparing and analyzing the grammar type of the textbooks. 5 textbooks which are usually used are selected and analyzed. The results are as follows. First, 5 textbooks commonly allocate the grammar part in isolation after ‘after-reading activities’ and have the similar number of grammatical items, which is from 19 to 22. Second, the textbooks introduce grammatical items in an inductive way where students com-prehend examples first and discover the grammatical rules in common. Last, most of the textbooks introduce appropriate content on the basis of students’ level but its order appears different respectively.","PeriodicalId":148219,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis on Grammar Patterns of English Textbooks for Middle School Juniors According to Revised Curriculum in 2009\",\"authors\":\"Youn-A Kwon, Mun-koo Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.21742/AJEMR.2016.1.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to discover whether language form is appropriately reflected in English textbooks for middle school juniors through comparing and analyzing the grammar type of the textbooks. 5 textbooks which are usually used are selected and analyzed. The results are as follows. First, 5 textbooks commonly allocate the grammar part in isolation after ‘after-reading activities’ and have the similar number of grammatical items, which is from 19 to 22. Second, the textbooks introduce grammatical items in an inductive way where students com-prehend examples first and discover the grammatical rules in common. Last, most of the textbooks introduce appropriate content on the basis of students’ level but its order appears different respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21742/AJEMR.2016.1.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21742/AJEMR.2016.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在通过对初中英语教材语法类型的比较和分析,发现语言形式在初中英语教材中是否得到了恰当的体现。选择并分析了常用的5种教材。结果如下:首先,5本教材普遍将语法部分在“读后活动”后单独分配,语法项目数量相似,在19 - 22个之间。其次,教材以归纳的方式介绍语法项目,学生首先理解例子,发现共同的语法规则。最后,大多数教材根据学生的水平适当地介绍内容,但其顺序各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis on Grammar Patterns of English Textbooks for Middle School Juniors According to Revised Curriculum in 2009
This study aims to discover whether language form is appropriately reflected in English textbooks for middle school juniors through comparing and analyzing the grammar type of the textbooks. 5 textbooks which are usually used are selected and analyzed. The results are as follows. First, 5 textbooks commonly allocate the grammar part in isolation after ‘after-reading activities’ and have the similar number of grammatical items, which is from 19 to 22. Second, the textbooks introduce grammatical items in an inductive way where students com-prehend examples first and discover the grammatical rules in common. Last, most of the textbooks introduce appropriate content on the basis of students’ level but its order appears different respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the Link between Metacognitive Skills and Mathematics Performance: A Correlational Study in Grade X Evaluating the Effectiveness and Opinions of School Children in North Chile on an Alternative Audiovisual or Text Report for Communicating Science Enhancing Curriculum Management through Lesson Study: Insights from the SECI Knowledge Creation Model Empowering Communities through Technical Education: A Case Study of the Technical Teachers’ Training and Research Formation of the Quality of Leadership: The Role of Education and Values
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1