关于具有模糊偏好的错误陈述博弈

Masahiro Nishi, Naoki Fukuta
{"title":"关于具有模糊偏好的错误陈述博弈","authors":"Masahiro Nishi, Naoki Fukuta","doi":"10.1109/AGENTS.2018.8459932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we show an analysis on a Misrepresentation Game with ambiguous preferences. A Misrepresentation Game is a game that sometimes an agent obtains higher utility than truth-telling on a preference-elicitation based fair division negotiation by misrepresenting their preferences while it is still difficult to be noticed by the counterpart. We investigate whether we can generate mechanisms for fair negotiations which avoids incentives to make misrepresentations by using a way of automated design of mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":248901,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Misrepresentation Game with Ambiguous Preferences\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Nishi, Naoki Fukuta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AGENTS.2018.8459932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we show an analysis on a Misrepresentation Game with ambiguous preferences. A Misrepresentation Game is a game that sometimes an agent obtains higher utility than truth-telling on a preference-elicitation based fair division negotiation by misrepresenting their preferences while it is still difficult to be noticed by the counterpart. We investigate whether we can generate mechanisms for fair negotiations which avoids incentives to make misrepresentations by using a way of automated design of mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGENTS.2018.8459932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGENTS.2018.8459932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们展示了一个具有模糊偏好的错误陈述博弈的分析。虚假陈述博弈是指在基于偏好诱导的公平分配谈判中,代理人有时通过虚假陈述自己的偏好而获得比诚实陈述更高的效用,但仍然难以被对方注意到的博弈。我们研究是否可以通过使用机制自动设计的方式来产生公平谈判机制,从而避免做出虚假陈述的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a Misrepresentation Game with Ambiguous Preferences
In this paper, we show an analysis on a Misrepresentation Game with ambiguous preferences. A Misrepresentation Game is a game that sometimes an agent obtains higher utility than truth-telling on a preference-elicitation based fair division negotiation by misrepresenting their preferences while it is still difficult to be noticed by the counterpart. We investigate whether we can generate mechanisms for fair negotiations which avoids incentives to make misrepresentations by using a way of automated design of mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proceedings: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA) Identifying safety properties guaranteed in changed environment at runtime A Cyclical Social Learning Strategy for Robust Convention Emergence Copyright Efficient Task Allocation with Communication Delay Based on Reciprocal Teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1