比较基于容器的微服务和作为服务的工作空间:选择哪一个?

Junming Ma, Bo An, Donggang Cao, Xiangqun Chen
{"title":"比较基于容器的微服务和作为服务的工作空间:选择哪一个?","authors":"Junming Ma, Bo An, Donggang Cao, Xiangqun Chen","doi":"10.1109/SOSE.2018.00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of microservices has gained increasing popularity since 2014. Almost during the same period, container technology keeps developing and is considered as an excellent way to build microservices-based applications. Mainstream public cloud vendors such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform all provide users with container-based solutions to implementing microservices. Workspace as a Service (WaaS) proposed by An et al. is another approach which uses containers to serve users. Both container-based microservices and WaaS are used to effectively utilize cluster resources via maintaining a number of containers. In this paper, we compare the designing ideas and supporting platforms of these two approaches, which provides a perspective for cluster administrators and users to understand the scenarios where to use them and how to make an appropriate choice to meet their needs. We find that container-based microservices are more suitable for professional IT companies while WaaS fits education and research institutions better.","PeriodicalId":414464,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Container-Based Microservices and Workspace as a Service: Which One to Choose?\",\"authors\":\"Junming Ma, Bo An, Donggang Cao, Xiangqun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOSE.2018.00040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of microservices has gained increasing popularity since 2014. Almost during the same period, container technology keeps developing and is considered as an excellent way to build microservices-based applications. Mainstream public cloud vendors such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform all provide users with container-based solutions to implementing microservices. Workspace as a Service (WaaS) proposed by An et al. is another approach which uses containers to serve users. Both container-based microservices and WaaS are used to effectively utilize cluster resources via maintaining a number of containers. In this paper, we compare the designing ideas and supporting platforms of these two approaches, which provides a perspective for cluster administrators and users to understand the scenarios where to use them and how to make an appropriate choice to meet their needs. We find that container-based microservices are more suitable for professional IT companies while WaaS fits education and research institutions better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE.2018.00040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE.2018.00040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自2014年以来,微服务的概念越来越受欢迎。几乎在同一时期,容器技术不断发展,被认为是构建基于微服务的应用程序的一种极好的方式。主流的公共云供应商,如Amazon Web Services、Microsoft Azure和Google cloud Platform,都为用户提供基于容器的解决方案来实现微服务。An等人提出的工作空间即服务(WaaS)是另一种使用容器为用户服务的方法。基于容器的微服务和WaaS都可以通过维护大量容器来有效地利用集群资源。在本文中,我们比较了这两种方法的设计思想和支持平台,这为集群管理员和用户提供了一个视角,以了解在哪里使用它们以及如何做出适当的选择来满足他们的需求。我们发现基于容器的微服务更适合专业的IT公司,而WaaS更适合教育和研究机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Container-Based Microservices and Workspace as a Service: Which One to Choose?
The concept of microservices has gained increasing popularity since 2014. Almost during the same period, container technology keeps developing and is considered as an excellent way to build microservices-based applications. Mainstream public cloud vendors such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform all provide users with container-based solutions to implementing microservices. Workspace as a Service (WaaS) proposed by An et al. is another approach which uses containers to serve users. Both container-based microservices and WaaS are used to effectively utilize cluster resources via maintaining a number of containers. In this paper, we compare the designing ideas and supporting platforms of these two approaches, which provides a perspective for cluster administrators and users to understand the scenarios where to use them and how to make an appropriate choice to meet their needs. We find that container-based microservices are more suitable for professional IT companies while WaaS fits education and research institutions better.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
VTDL: A Notation for Data Stream Processing Applications Testing IoT Systems Overcoming Security Challenges in Microservice Architectures Cuckoo Migration: Self Migration on JointCloud Using New Hardware Features If Docker is the Answer, What is the Question?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1