南非宪法法院判决反对无国籍并支持儿童:Chisuse诉内政部局长[2020]ZACC 20

Mihloti Basil Sherinda, J. Klaaren
{"title":"南非宪法法院判决反对无国籍并支持儿童:Chisuse诉内政部局长[2020]ZACC 20","authors":"Mihloti Basil Sherinda, J. Klaaren","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/y3r6p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2020 Chisuse case of the Constitutional Court of South Africa comes at a crucial moment in South Africa’s post-apartheid trajectory where the circle of citizenship is ‘shrinking’ The Constitutional Court decided in favour of four of the five foreign-born applicants, all children with one citizen parent, who had sought an order to be registered as citizens by the relevant government department, the Department of Home Affairs (DHA). The applicants argued that the DHA’s interpretation of the amended citizenship law violated their constitutional rights. Not deciding the matter on a constitutional basis, the Constitutional Court creatively and authoritatively interpreted the statutory regime in favour of the applicants. An example of the Court’s important national role in upholding a human rights-based vision of South African citizenship against persistent and potentially growing bureaucratic opposition, Chisuse also displays an interpretive approach both mindful of the risks of child statelessness and supportive of the place of civil birth registration in the global provision of legal identity for all.","PeriodicalId":314133,"journal":{"name":"Statelessness & Citizenship Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The South African Constitutional Court Decides Against Statelessness and In Favour of Children: Chisuse v Director-General, Department of Home Affairs [2020] ZACC 20\",\"authors\":\"Mihloti Basil Sherinda, J. Klaaren\",\"doi\":\"10.31219/osf.io/y3r6p\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2020 Chisuse case of the Constitutional Court of South Africa comes at a crucial moment in South Africa’s post-apartheid trajectory where the circle of citizenship is ‘shrinking’ The Constitutional Court decided in favour of four of the five foreign-born applicants, all children with one citizen parent, who had sought an order to be registered as citizens by the relevant government department, the Department of Home Affairs (DHA). The applicants argued that the DHA’s interpretation of the amended citizenship law violated their constitutional rights. Not deciding the matter on a constitutional basis, the Constitutional Court creatively and authoritatively interpreted the statutory regime in favour of the applicants. An example of the Court’s important national role in upholding a human rights-based vision of South African citizenship against persistent and potentially growing bureaucratic opposition, Chisuse also displays an interpretive approach both mindful of the risks of child statelessness and supportive of the place of civil birth registration in the global provision of legal identity for all.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statelessness & Citizenship Review\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statelessness & Citizenship Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/y3r6p\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statelessness & Citizenship Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/y3r6p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2020年南非宪法法院的Chisuse案发生在南非后种族隔离轨迹的关键时刻,公民圈子正在“缩小”。宪法法院决定支持五名外国出生申请人中的四名,他们都是父母一方为公民的孩子,他们曾寻求相关政府部门民政事务部(DHA)的命令,以登记为公民。申请人认为,DHA对修订后的《公民法》的解释侵犯了他们的宪法权利。宪法法院没有在宪法基础上决定这个问题,而是创造性地和权威性地解释了有利于申请人的法定制度。作为法院在维护以人权为基础的南非公民权愿景方面发挥重要国家作用的一个例子,Chisuse还展示了一种解释方法,既注意到儿童无国籍的风险,又支持在全球为所有人提供法律身份的过程中进行民事出生登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The South African Constitutional Court Decides Against Statelessness and In Favour of Children: Chisuse v Director-General, Department of Home Affairs [2020] ZACC 20
The 2020 Chisuse case of the Constitutional Court of South Africa comes at a crucial moment in South Africa’s post-apartheid trajectory where the circle of citizenship is ‘shrinking’ The Constitutional Court decided in favour of four of the five foreign-born applicants, all children with one citizen parent, who had sought an order to be registered as citizens by the relevant government department, the Department of Home Affairs (DHA). The applicants argued that the DHA’s interpretation of the amended citizenship law violated their constitutional rights. Not deciding the matter on a constitutional basis, the Constitutional Court creatively and authoritatively interpreted the statutory regime in favour of the applicants. An example of the Court’s important national role in upholding a human rights-based vision of South African citizenship against persistent and potentially growing bureaucratic opposition, Chisuse also displays an interpretive approach both mindful of the risks of child statelessness and supportive of the place of civil birth registration in the global provision of legal identity for all.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
R (Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 3; [2022] 2 WLR 343 Citizenship Stripping in Myanmar as Lawfare The Law is Not Enough The Poe Cases Invisible people, visible barriers: Healthcare Access for and among Ethnic Bengalis in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1