卵巢癌的细胞减少手术

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgical Clinics of North America Pub Date : 2001-08-01 Epub Date: 2005-05-25 DOI:10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70171-7
Thomas C. Randall MD , Stephen C. Rubin MD
{"title":"卵巢癌的细胞减少手术","authors":"Thomas C. Randall MD ,&nbsp;Stephen C. Rubin MD","doi":"10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70171-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>The diagnosis and management of ovarian cancer is one the greatest and most important challenges in oncology. Cancer of the ovary is diagnosed in approximately 25,000 women in the United States each year, more than 14,000 of whom die of the disease</span><span><span><sup>17</sup></span></span><span>—more than die from all other gynecologic malignancies combined. These grim statistics are a reflection of the fact that no effective means exists to screen for ovarian cancer. Most women with ovarian cancer are therefore diagnosed with advanced disease, and most of these women die of the disease. Thus, the burden of morbidity and mortality from ovarian cancer is comparable to that of much more prevalent diseases, such as breast cancer.</span></div><div><span>Tremendous advances have been made in chemotherapy for ovarian cancer over the past 20 years, but surgery remains the cornerstone of effective management of the disease. Repeated investigations have shown that cancer of the ovary is unusual among solid tumors<span> in that surgical reduction of tumor volume is highly correlated with a prolongation of patient survival. Patients who are left with little or no visible residual cancer at the end of their initial surgery enjoy a dramatically improved survival time over women who have bulky residual tumor at the end of initial surgery or who are treated by chemotherapy alone. A review of the published studies of surgical cytoreduction revealed that women with less than 2 cm of residual tumor at the end of initial surgery had a median survival time of 37 months, whereas women with bulky residual disease had a median survival time of 17 months.</span></span><span><span><sup>11</sup></span></span> It is rarely appropriate, therefore, for a patient who is presumed to have ovarian cancer to be treated with chemotherapy alone. Thus, an integrated, multimodality approach is essential to the effective management of ovarian cancer.</div><div>The benefit of surgical cytoreduction of ovarian cancer is most clear at the time of initial surgery. Although no prospective, randomized trials of surgical cytoreduction for ovarian cancer have been performed, the accumulated retrospective evidence shows such a strong correlation between the volume of tumor remaining after initial surgery and survival time that most oncologists would consider such a trial unethical. The data show somewhat less benefit from surgical cytoreduction performed after initial presentation and surgery, but several recent, well-performed studies have demonstrated a benefit, particularly in patients who have chemotherapy-sensitive tumors that are cytoreduced to minimal or no residual disease.</div><div>Surgical cytoreduction can be performed in a large proportion of patients with limited morbidity. It is also clear, however, that an unsuccessful cytoreduction, that is, an extensive surgery that leaves the patient with tumor nodules 2 cm or larger in diameter, offers no appreciable survival benefit and may place the patient at risk for significant morbidity. There is no currently available technology that allows the surgeon to anticipate which patients have disease that is unresectable, although attempts have been made to do so.<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span><span> The surgeon must be prepared, therefore, to determine intraoperatively whether a surgical cytoreduction can be safely completed. This is a crucial moment in the patient's care: if the decision is made inappropriately to attempt a complete debulking procedure, the patient may suffer undue morbidity, with little benefit. If the decision not to attempt a debulking is inappropriate, however, the patient may be doomed to a significantly shorter survival.</span></div><div>To be able to make and execute such a decision, the surgeon must be able to understand the natural history of ovarian cancer and the fundamentals of tumor kinetics as they pertain to ovarian cancer. He or she must also understand the evidence supporting surgical cytoreduction in the settings of a patient's initial surgery at the time of a second-look laparotomy and in the presence of known recurrent disease. These areas are reviewed, with the goal of delineating the rationale and appropriate application of surgical cytoreduction for ovarian cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54441,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Clinics of North America","volume":"81 4","pages":"Pages 871-883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY FOR OVARIAN CANCER\",\"authors\":\"Thomas C. Randall MD ,&nbsp;Stephen C. Rubin MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70171-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><span>The diagnosis and management of ovarian cancer is one the greatest and most important challenges in oncology. Cancer of the ovary is diagnosed in approximately 25,000 women in the United States each year, more than 14,000 of whom die of the disease</span><span><span><sup>17</sup></span></span><span>—more than die from all other gynecologic malignancies combined. These grim statistics are a reflection of the fact that no effective means exists to screen for ovarian cancer. Most women with ovarian cancer are therefore diagnosed with advanced disease, and most of these women die of the disease. Thus, the burden of morbidity and mortality from ovarian cancer is comparable to that of much more prevalent diseases, such as breast cancer.</span></div><div><span>Tremendous advances have been made in chemotherapy for ovarian cancer over the past 20 years, but surgery remains the cornerstone of effective management of the disease. Repeated investigations have shown that cancer of the ovary is unusual among solid tumors<span> in that surgical reduction of tumor volume is highly correlated with a prolongation of patient survival. Patients who are left with little or no visible residual cancer at the end of their initial surgery enjoy a dramatically improved survival time over women who have bulky residual tumor at the end of initial surgery or who are treated by chemotherapy alone. A review of the published studies of surgical cytoreduction revealed that women with less than 2 cm of residual tumor at the end of initial surgery had a median survival time of 37 months, whereas women with bulky residual disease had a median survival time of 17 months.</span></span><span><span><sup>11</sup></span></span> It is rarely appropriate, therefore, for a patient who is presumed to have ovarian cancer to be treated with chemotherapy alone. Thus, an integrated, multimodality approach is essential to the effective management of ovarian cancer.</div><div>The benefit of surgical cytoreduction of ovarian cancer is most clear at the time of initial surgery. Although no prospective, randomized trials of surgical cytoreduction for ovarian cancer have been performed, the accumulated retrospective evidence shows such a strong correlation between the volume of tumor remaining after initial surgery and survival time that most oncologists would consider such a trial unethical. The data show somewhat less benefit from surgical cytoreduction performed after initial presentation and surgery, but several recent, well-performed studies have demonstrated a benefit, particularly in patients who have chemotherapy-sensitive tumors that are cytoreduced to minimal or no residual disease.</div><div>Surgical cytoreduction can be performed in a large proportion of patients with limited morbidity. It is also clear, however, that an unsuccessful cytoreduction, that is, an extensive surgery that leaves the patient with tumor nodules 2 cm or larger in diameter, offers no appreciable survival benefit and may place the patient at risk for significant morbidity. There is no currently available technology that allows the surgeon to anticipate which patients have disease that is unresectable, although attempts have been made to do so.<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span><span> The surgeon must be prepared, therefore, to determine intraoperatively whether a surgical cytoreduction can be safely completed. This is a crucial moment in the patient's care: if the decision is made inappropriately to attempt a complete debulking procedure, the patient may suffer undue morbidity, with little benefit. If the decision not to attempt a debulking is inappropriate, however, the patient may be doomed to a significantly shorter survival.</span></div><div>To be able to make and execute such a decision, the surgeon must be able to understand the natural history of ovarian cancer and the fundamentals of tumor kinetics as they pertain to ovarian cancer. He or she must also understand the evidence supporting surgical cytoreduction in the settings of a patient's initial surgery at the time of a second-look laparotomy and in the presence of known recurrent disease. These areas are reviewed, with the goal of delineating the rationale and appropriate application of surgical cytoreduction for ovarian cancer.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Clinics of North America\",\"volume\":\"81 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 871-883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Clinics of North America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039610905701717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2005/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Clinics of North America","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039610905701717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2005/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卵巢癌的诊断和治疗是肿瘤学最大和最重要的挑战之一。在美国,每年大约有25,000名女性被诊断出卵巢癌,其中超过14,000人死于该病,比死于其他所有妇科恶性肿瘤的人数总和还要多。这些严峻的统计数据反映了一个事实,即没有有效的手段来筛查卵巢癌。因此,大多数患有卵巢癌的妇女被诊断为晚期疾病,其中大多数妇女死于这种疾病。因此,卵巢癌的发病率和死亡率负担与乳腺癌等更为普遍的疾病相当。在过去的20年里,卵巢癌的化疗取得了巨大的进步,但手术仍然是有效治疗这种疾病的基石。反复研究表明,卵巢癌在实体瘤中并不常见,手术缩小肿瘤体积与延长患者生存期高度相关。在初次手术结束时留下很少或没有可见残留肿瘤的患者,比在初次手术结束时留下大块残留肿瘤或仅接受化疗的女性的生存时间显着提高。对已发表的手术细胞减少研究的回顾显示,初始手术结束时肿瘤残留小于2厘米的妇女的中位生存时间为37个月,而肿瘤残留较大的妇女的中位生存时间为17个月因此,对于一个被认为患有卵巢癌的病人来说,单独接受化疗是不合适的。因此,一个综合的,多模式的方法是必不可少的有效管理卵巢癌。手术减少卵巢癌细胞的好处在初次手术时是最明显的。虽然没有前瞻性、随机的卵巢癌手术细胞减少试验,但积累的回顾性证据表明,初始手术后剩余肿瘤体积与生存时间之间存在很强的相关性,大多数肿瘤学家认为这样的试验是不道德的。数据显示,在初次表现和手术后进行手术细胞减少的益处较少,但最近几项执行良好的研究已经证明了益处,特别是对于那些细胞减少到最小或无残留疾病的化疗敏感肿瘤患者。手术细胞减少可以在很大比例的病人进行有限的发病率。然而,同样清楚的是,一个不成功的细胞减少,即一个大范围的手术,留下直径2厘米或更大的肿瘤结节,不能提供明显的生存益处,并可能使患者处于显著发病率的风险中。尽管已经进行了一些尝试,但目前还没有技术可以让外科医生预测哪些病人患有无法切除的疾病因此,外科医生必须做好准备,以确定术中是否可以安全地完成手术细胞减少。这是患者护理的关键时刻:如果不恰当地决定尝试完整的减体积程序,患者可能会遭受不应有的发病率,几乎没有好处。然而,如果决定不去尝试减体积是不合适的,病人可能注定要大大缩短生存时间。为了能够做出和执行这样的决定,外科医生必须能够理解卵巢癌的自然历史和肿瘤动力学的基本原理,因为它们与卵巢癌有关。他或她还必须了解支持手术细胞减少的证据,在患者初次手术的情况下,在第二次剖腹手术时,在已知的复发性疾病的存在。这些领域的审查,与划定的基本原理和适当的应用手术细胞减少卵巢癌的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY FOR OVARIAN CANCER
The diagnosis and management of ovarian cancer is one the greatest and most important challenges in oncology. Cancer of the ovary is diagnosed in approximately 25,000 women in the United States each year, more than 14,000 of whom die of the disease17—more than die from all other gynecologic malignancies combined. These grim statistics are a reflection of the fact that no effective means exists to screen for ovarian cancer. Most women with ovarian cancer are therefore diagnosed with advanced disease, and most of these women die of the disease. Thus, the burden of morbidity and mortality from ovarian cancer is comparable to that of much more prevalent diseases, such as breast cancer.
Tremendous advances have been made in chemotherapy for ovarian cancer over the past 20 years, but surgery remains the cornerstone of effective management of the disease. Repeated investigations have shown that cancer of the ovary is unusual among solid tumors in that surgical reduction of tumor volume is highly correlated with a prolongation of patient survival. Patients who are left with little or no visible residual cancer at the end of their initial surgery enjoy a dramatically improved survival time over women who have bulky residual tumor at the end of initial surgery or who are treated by chemotherapy alone. A review of the published studies of surgical cytoreduction revealed that women with less than 2 cm of residual tumor at the end of initial surgery had a median survival time of 37 months, whereas women with bulky residual disease had a median survival time of 17 months.11 It is rarely appropriate, therefore, for a patient who is presumed to have ovarian cancer to be treated with chemotherapy alone. Thus, an integrated, multimodality approach is essential to the effective management of ovarian cancer.
The benefit of surgical cytoreduction of ovarian cancer is most clear at the time of initial surgery. Although no prospective, randomized trials of surgical cytoreduction for ovarian cancer have been performed, the accumulated retrospective evidence shows such a strong correlation between the volume of tumor remaining after initial surgery and survival time that most oncologists would consider such a trial unethical. The data show somewhat less benefit from surgical cytoreduction performed after initial presentation and surgery, but several recent, well-performed studies have demonstrated a benefit, particularly in patients who have chemotherapy-sensitive tumors that are cytoreduced to minimal or no residual disease.
Surgical cytoreduction can be performed in a large proportion of patients with limited morbidity. It is also clear, however, that an unsuccessful cytoreduction, that is, an extensive surgery that leaves the patient with tumor nodules 2 cm or larger in diameter, offers no appreciable survival benefit and may place the patient at risk for significant morbidity. There is no currently available technology that allows the surgeon to anticipate which patients have disease that is unresectable, although attempts have been made to do so.2 The surgeon must be prepared, therefore, to determine intraoperatively whether a surgical cytoreduction can be safely completed. This is a crucial moment in the patient's care: if the decision is made inappropriately to attempt a complete debulking procedure, the patient may suffer undue morbidity, with little benefit. If the decision not to attempt a debulking is inappropriate, however, the patient may be doomed to a significantly shorter survival.
To be able to make and execute such a decision, the surgeon must be able to understand the natural history of ovarian cancer and the fundamentals of tumor kinetics as they pertain to ovarian cancer. He or she must also understand the evidence supporting surgical cytoreduction in the settings of a patient's initial surgery at the time of a second-look laparotomy and in the presence of known recurrent disease. These areas are reviewed, with the goal of delineating the rationale and appropriate application of surgical cytoreduction for ovarian cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Clinics of North America has kept surgeons informed on the latest techniques from leading surgical centers worldwide. Each bimonthly issue (February, April, June, August, October, and December) is devoted to a single topic relevant to the busy surgeon, with articles written by experts in the field. Case studies and complete references are also included to give you the most thorough data you need to stay on top of your practice. Topics include general surgery, alimentary surgery, abdominal surgery, critical care surgery, trauma surgery, endocrine surgery, breast cancer surgery, transplantation, pediatric surgery, and vascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Contents Copyright Contributors Forthcoming Issues From the Scalpel to Recovery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1