关于根据风险标准修订空气中化学致癌物监管框架的问题

I. Chernychenko, O. Lytvychenko, V. Babii, S. Harkavyi, N. Balenko, O.Ye. Kondratenko, D. Hlavachek
{"title":"关于根据风险标准修订空气中化学致癌物监管框架的问题","authors":"I. Chernychenko, O. Lytvychenko, V. Babii, S. Harkavyi, N. Balenko, O.Ye. Kondratenko, D. Hlavachek","doi":"10.32402/dovkil2022.02.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the work was to analyze the risk of carcinogenic substances in populated areas and industrial zone, included in domestic regulatory frameworks, in accordance with international qualification standards, and to determine the safety level of existing hygienic standards for humans by specific oncogenic hazard criteria. Materials and methods. Bibliosemantic, bibliographic and hygienic research methods was used in the work. The results were obtained on the basis of collection and analysis of data on chemical carcinogenic compounds that are dangerous to humans, according to international directives, domestic and foreign regulatory frameworks. Carcinogenicity indicators was identified to assess the hazards of certain substances and hygienic regulatory levels. Research results and their discussion. The analysis of national and international databases on carcinogenic compounds, assessment of their physicochemical properties, dose-effect response and health effects was carried out. It was shown that today the most recognized and widespread base of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, in which based on a critical analysis of experimental and epidemiological data of more than 1000 chemical factors, their classification was carried out according to the degree of evidence of carcinogenic hazard to humans, the hygienic expression of which is carcinogenic risk. The analysis of domestic databases of hygienic standards for the permissible content of chemicals showed that only for 131 carcinogenic substances the MPC in the air is justified, however, according to the criterion of carcinogenic risk, most of them do not meet the requirements of the EU and world practices, which indicates the need for their revision. It is emphasized that one of the available and adequate methods of this task is the principle laid down in determining the relationship \"concentration - risk (acceptable risk)\". Conclusions. It was shown that according to the criterion of carcinogenic risk, the hygienic standards of most carcinogenic substances included in domestic regulatory air bases do not meet the requirements of the EU and international practices, which indicates the need to revise them based on acceptable risk.","PeriodicalId":144023,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the issue of revising the regulatory framework for chemical carcinogens in the air according to the risk criterion\",\"authors\":\"I. Chernychenko, O. Lytvychenko, V. Babii, S. Harkavyi, N. Balenko, O.Ye. Kondratenko, D. Hlavachek\",\"doi\":\"10.32402/dovkil2022.02.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the work was to analyze the risk of carcinogenic substances in populated areas and industrial zone, included in domestic regulatory frameworks, in accordance with international qualification standards, and to determine the safety level of existing hygienic standards for humans by specific oncogenic hazard criteria. Materials and methods. Bibliosemantic, bibliographic and hygienic research methods was used in the work. The results were obtained on the basis of collection and analysis of data on chemical carcinogenic compounds that are dangerous to humans, according to international directives, domestic and foreign regulatory frameworks. Carcinogenicity indicators was identified to assess the hazards of certain substances and hygienic regulatory levels. Research results and their discussion. The analysis of national and international databases on carcinogenic compounds, assessment of their physicochemical properties, dose-effect response and health effects was carried out. It was shown that today the most recognized and widespread base of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, in which based on a critical analysis of experimental and epidemiological data of more than 1000 chemical factors, their classification was carried out according to the degree of evidence of carcinogenic hazard to humans, the hygienic expression of which is carcinogenic risk. The analysis of domestic databases of hygienic standards for the permissible content of chemicals showed that only for 131 carcinogenic substances the MPC in the air is justified, however, according to the criterion of carcinogenic risk, most of them do not meet the requirements of the EU and world practices, which indicates the need for their revision. It is emphasized that one of the available and adequate methods of this task is the principle laid down in determining the relationship \\\"concentration - risk (acceptable risk)\\\". Conclusions. It was shown that according to the criterion of carcinogenic risk, the hygienic standards of most carcinogenic substances included in domestic regulatory air bases do not meet the requirements of the EU and international practices, which indicates the need to revise them based on acceptable risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2022.02.042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2022.02.042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项工作的目的是根据国际资格标准,分析包括在国内监管框架内的人口稠密地区和工业区致癌物质的风险,并根据具体的致癌危害标准确定现有人类卫生标准的安全水平。材料和方法。采用文献语义学、目录学和卫生学研究方法。该结果是根据国际指令、国内和国外监管框架,在收集和分析对人类有害的化学致癌化合物数据的基础上得出的。确定了致癌性指标,以评估某些物质的危害和卫生监管水平。研究结果及其讨论。对国家和国际致癌化合物数据库进行了分析,评估了它们的理化性质、剂量效应反应和健康影响。据显示,今天国际癌症研究机构最公认和最广泛的基础是,在对1000多种化学因素的实验和流行病学数据进行批判性分析的基础上,根据对人类致癌危害的证据程度对它们进行分类,其卫生表达是致癌风险。通过对国内化学物质允许含量卫生标准数据库的分析,空气中只有131种致癌物质的MPC是合理的,然而,根据致癌风险标准,大多数不符合欧盟和世界惯例的要求,这表明需要进行修订。有人强调指出,完成这项任务的现有和适当的方法之一是确定“集中-风险(可接受的风险)”关系所规定的原则。结论。研究表明,根据致癌风险标准,国内监管基地所包含的大多数致癌物质的卫生标准不符合欧盟和国际惯例的要求,这表明需要根据可接受的风险对其进行修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the issue of revising the regulatory framework for chemical carcinogens in the air according to the risk criterion
The aim of the work was to analyze the risk of carcinogenic substances in populated areas and industrial zone, included in domestic regulatory frameworks, in accordance with international qualification standards, and to determine the safety level of existing hygienic standards for humans by specific oncogenic hazard criteria. Materials and methods. Bibliosemantic, bibliographic and hygienic research methods was used in the work. The results were obtained on the basis of collection and analysis of data on chemical carcinogenic compounds that are dangerous to humans, according to international directives, domestic and foreign regulatory frameworks. Carcinogenicity indicators was identified to assess the hazards of certain substances and hygienic regulatory levels. Research results and their discussion. The analysis of national and international databases on carcinogenic compounds, assessment of their physicochemical properties, dose-effect response and health effects was carried out. It was shown that today the most recognized and widespread base of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, in which based on a critical analysis of experimental and epidemiological data of more than 1000 chemical factors, their classification was carried out according to the degree of evidence of carcinogenic hazard to humans, the hygienic expression of which is carcinogenic risk. The analysis of domestic databases of hygienic standards for the permissible content of chemicals showed that only for 131 carcinogenic substances the MPC in the air is justified, however, according to the criterion of carcinogenic risk, most of them do not meet the requirements of the EU and world practices, which indicates the need for their revision. It is emphasized that one of the available and adequate methods of this task is the principle laid down in determining the relationship "concentration - risk (acceptable risk)". Conclusions. It was shown that according to the criterion of carcinogenic risk, the hygienic standards of most carcinogenic substances included in domestic regulatory air bases do not meet the requirements of the EU and international practices, which indicates the need to revise them based on acceptable risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between Exposure to Metals during Pregnancy, Childhood Gut Microbiome, and Risk of Intestinal Inflammation in Late Childhood Balancing the Functionality and Biocompatibility of Materials with a Deep-Learning-Based Inverse Design Framework Moving beyond Wastewater: Perspectives on Environmental Surveillance of Infectious Diseases for Public Health Action in Low-Resource Settings Establishing a Multifaceted Comprehensive Maternity Cohort Facilitates Understanding of How Environmental Exposures Impact Perinatal Health Indoor Environment and Health Effects: Protocol of an Exploratory Panel Study among Young Adults in China (China IEHE Study)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1