自信补偿隐私保护

P. Cofta
{"title":"自信补偿隐私保护","authors":"P. Cofta","doi":"10.1109/PST.2008.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The particularly acute problem in privacy protection is to provide such a protection beyond the original disclosure of personal information. There, the need for privacy is strongly related to the confidence in the goodwill of the party that receives such information. In the absence of such a confidence, the disclosure should be limited. However, putting excessive constrains on the disclosure itself can have a damaging effect on the relationship. In order to minimize the potential damage, limitations to the extent of a disclosure should be deployed sparsely, with its strength and direction adjusted to the extent of actual lack of confidence. This paper proposes the flexible strategy for privacy protection that takes into account the lack of perceived confidence. The strategy determines three orthogonal dimensions that can be used to classify various privacy-enhancing tools and links those dimensions with individualpsilas structure of beliefs regarding confidence. This allows to provide the simple decision-making tools that allows to determine the best minimum privacy protection for a given case.","PeriodicalId":422934,"journal":{"name":"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confidence-Compensating Privacy Protection\",\"authors\":\"P. Cofta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PST.2008.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The particularly acute problem in privacy protection is to provide such a protection beyond the original disclosure of personal information. There, the need for privacy is strongly related to the confidence in the goodwill of the party that receives such information. In the absence of such a confidence, the disclosure should be limited. However, putting excessive constrains on the disclosure itself can have a damaging effect on the relationship. In order to minimize the potential damage, limitations to the extent of a disclosure should be deployed sparsely, with its strength and direction adjusted to the extent of actual lack of confidence. This paper proposes the flexible strategy for privacy protection that takes into account the lack of perceived confidence. The strategy determines three orthogonal dimensions that can be used to classify various privacy-enhancing tools and links those dimensions with individualpsilas structure of beliefs regarding confidence. This allows to provide the simple decision-making tools that allows to determine the best minimum privacy protection for a given case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2008.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2008.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在个人信息的原始披露之外提供这样的保护,是隐私保护中特别尖锐的问题。在那里,对隐私的需要与对接收此类信息的一方的善意的信任密切相关。在缺乏这种信任的情况下,披露应该是有限的。然而,对信息披露本身施加过多的限制可能会对双方的关系产生破坏性影响。为了尽量减少潜在的损害,对披露程度的限制应该很少,其力度和方向应根据实际缺乏信心的程度进行调整。本文提出了一种考虑感知信任缺失的灵活隐私保护策略。该策略确定了三个正交的维度,可用于对各种隐私增强工具进行分类,并将这些维度与个人关于信心的信念结构联系起来。这允许提供简单的决策工具,以确定给定情况下的最佳最小隐私保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Confidence-Compensating Privacy Protection
The particularly acute problem in privacy protection is to provide such a protection beyond the original disclosure of personal information. There, the need for privacy is strongly related to the confidence in the goodwill of the party that receives such information. In the absence of such a confidence, the disclosure should be limited. However, putting excessive constrains on the disclosure itself can have a damaging effect on the relationship. In order to minimize the potential damage, limitations to the extent of a disclosure should be deployed sparsely, with its strength and direction adjusted to the extent of actual lack of confidence. This paper proposes the flexible strategy for privacy protection that takes into account the lack of perceived confidence. The strategy determines three orthogonal dimensions that can be used to classify various privacy-enhancing tools and links those dimensions with individualpsilas structure of beliefs regarding confidence. This allows to provide the simple decision-making tools that allows to determine the best minimum privacy protection for a given case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incorporating Privacy Outcomes: Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks LogView: Visualizing Event Log Clusters Unlinkable Communication The Uncertainty of the Truth Model-Checking for Software Vulnerabilities Detection with Multi-Language Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1