在批判性研究和写作课程中创造艺术

Kate Hanzalik
{"title":"在批判性研究和写作课程中创造艺术","authors":"Kate Hanzalik","doi":"10.37514/dbh-j.2019.7.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Key Questions in the Art-Based Writing Movement Is there a place for artistic creation in a required writing course that emphasizes critical thinking and research? A necessary starting point to answer that question for the purpose of this report is another question: What is the nature of critical thinking? Three perspectives inform the response: the Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing (Framework; Council of Writing Program Administrators [CWPA], National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project, 2011); the WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition 3.0 (Statement; CWPA, 2014), which is applicable to required general education writing courses; and that of those beyond writing studies: educators and practitioners in the fields of art and design. According to the Framework, critical thinking is “the ability to analyze a situation or text and make thoughtful decisions based on that.” By “writ[ing] about familiar or unfamiliar texts [and] examining assumptions about the text held by different audiences,” students can “think through ideas, problems, and issues; identify and challenge assumptions; and explore multiple ways of understanding” (CWPA et al., 2011, p. 7). The Framework offers a comprehensive list of indicators of, and strategies for, critical thinking:","PeriodicalId":404723,"journal":{"name":"Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating Art in a Critical Research and Writing Course\",\"authors\":\"Kate Hanzalik\",\"doi\":\"10.37514/dbh-j.2019.7.1.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Key Questions in the Art-Based Writing Movement Is there a place for artistic creation in a required writing course that emphasizes critical thinking and research? A necessary starting point to answer that question for the purpose of this report is another question: What is the nature of critical thinking? Three perspectives inform the response: the Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing (Framework; Council of Writing Program Administrators [CWPA], National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project, 2011); the WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition 3.0 (Statement; CWPA, 2014), which is applicable to required general education writing courses; and that of those beyond writing studies: educators and practitioners in the fields of art and design. According to the Framework, critical thinking is “the ability to analyze a situation or text and make thoughtful decisions based on that.” By “writ[ing] about familiar or unfamiliar texts [and] examining assumptions about the text held by different audiences,” students can “think through ideas, problems, and issues; identify and challenge assumptions; and explore multiple ways of understanding” (CWPA et al., 2011, p. 7). The Framework offers a comprehensive list of indicators of, and strategies for, critical thinking:\",\"PeriodicalId\":404723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37514/dbh-j.2019.7.1.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/dbh-j.2019.7.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在强调批判性思维和研究的必修写作课程中,艺术创作是否有一席之地?为了本报告的目的,回答这个问题的一个必要的起点是另一个问题:批判性思维的本质是什么?三个视角为回应提供了依据:中学后写作成功的框架(框架;全国英语教师委员会,全国写作项目委员会,2011年);WPA第一年作文3.0成果声明(声明;CWPA, 2014),适用于通识教育写作必修课程;以及那些超越写作研究的人:艺术和设计领域的教育者和实践者。根据该框架,批判性思维是“分析情况或文本并在此基础上做出深思熟虑决定的能力”。通过“写熟悉或不熟悉的文本,并检查不同读者对文本的假设”,学生可以“思考思想、问题和议题;识别和挑战假设;并探索多种理解方式”(CWPA et al., 2011, p. 7)。该框架提供了批判性思维指标和策略的综合列表:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating Art in a Critical Research and Writing Course
Key Questions in the Art-Based Writing Movement Is there a place for artistic creation in a required writing course that emphasizes critical thinking and research? A necessary starting point to answer that question for the purpose of this report is another question: What is the nature of critical thinking? Three perspectives inform the response: the Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing (Framework; Council of Writing Program Administrators [CWPA], National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project, 2011); the WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition 3.0 (Statement; CWPA, 2014), which is applicable to required general education writing courses; and that of those beyond writing studies: educators and practitioners in the fields of art and design. According to the Framework, critical thinking is “the ability to analyze a situation or text and make thoughtful decisions based on that.” By “writ[ing] about familiar or unfamiliar texts [and] examining assumptions about the text held by different audiences,” students can “think through ideas, problems, and issues; identify and challenge assumptions; and explore multiple ways of understanding” (CWPA et al., 2011, p. 7). The Framework offers a comprehensive list of indicators of, and strategies for, critical thinking:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Peer Review in a Student-Run Scientific Journal First Day of Class: Lies, Fibs, Prevarication, and Refuge from the Commonplace The Archive of Workplace Writing Experiences: Using the Voices of Real-World Writers as a Bridge Between the Classroom and the Conference Room Editors' Introduction: A Journal of Moment First-Year Writing as the Critical Thinking Course: An Interactionist Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1