DMAC:错过截止日期控制

P. Pazzaglia, C. Mandrioli, M. Maggio, A. Cervin
{"title":"DMAC:错过截止日期控制","authors":"P. Pazzaglia, C. Mandrioli, M. Maggio, A. Cervin","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2019.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The real-time implementation of periodic controllers requires solving a co-design problem, in which the choice of the controller sampling period is a crucial element. Classic design techniques limit the period exploration to safe values, that guarantee the correct execution of the controller alongside the remaining real-time load, i.e., ensuring that the controller worst-case response time does not exceed its deadline. This paper presents DMAC: the first formally-grounded controller design strategy that explores shorter periods, thus explicitly taking into account the possibility of missing deadlines. The design leverages information about the probability that specific sub-sequences of deadline misses are experienced. The result is a fixed controller, that on average works as the ideal clairvoyant time-varying controller that possesses knowledge of deadline hits and misses. We obtain a safe estimate of the hit and miss events using the scenario theory, that allows us to provide probabilistic guarantees. The paper analyzes controllers implemented using the Logical Execution Time paradigm and three different strategies to handle deadline miss events: killing the job, letting the job continue but skipping the next activation, and letting the job continue using a limited queue of jobs. Our experimental results show that our design proposal – i.e., that exploring the space where deadline can be missed and handled with different strategies – greatly outperforms classical control design techniques.","PeriodicalId":191379,"journal":{"name":"Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DMAC: Deadline-Miss-Aware Control\",\"authors\":\"P. Pazzaglia, C. Mandrioli, M. Maggio, A. Cervin\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2019.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The real-time implementation of periodic controllers requires solving a co-design problem, in which the choice of the controller sampling period is a crucial element. Classic design techniques limit the period exploration to safe values, that guarantee the correct execution of the controller alongside the remaining real-time load, i.e., ensuring that the controller worst-case response time does not exceed its deadline. This paper presents DMAC: the first formally-grounded controller design strategy that explores shorter periods, thus explicitly taking into account the possibility of missing deadlines. The design leverages information about the probability that specific sub-sequences of deadline misses are experienced. The result is a fixed controller, that on average works as the ideal clairvoyant time-varying controller that possesses knowledge of deadline hits and misses. We obtain a safe estimate of the hit and miss events using the scenario theory, that allows us to provide probabilistic guarantees. The paper analyzes controllers implemented using the Logical Execution Time paradigm and three different strategies to handle deadline miss events: killing the job, letting the job continue but skipping the next activation, and letting the job continue using a limited queue of jobs. Our experimental results show that our design proposal – i.e., that exploring the space where deadline can be missed and handled with different strategies – greatly outperforms classical control design techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2019.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2019.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

周期控制器的实时实现需要解决协同设计问题,其中控制器采样周期的选择是一个关键因素。经典设计技术将周期探索限制在安全值,以保证控制器与剩余实时负载一起正确执行,即确保控制器的最坏情况响应时间不超过其截止日期。本文提出了DMAC:第一个探索较短周期的正式接地控制器设计策略,从而明确考虑到错过最后期限的可能性。该设计利用了有关错过截止日期的特定子序列的概率的信息。结果是一个固定的控制器,一般来说,它是一个理想的具有洞察力的时变控制器,拥有截止日期的知识。我们使用情景理论获得命中和未命中事件的安全估计,这允许我们提供概率保证。本文分析了使用逻辑执行时间范式实现的控制器和三种不同的策略来处理截止日期错过事件:终止作业,让作业继续但跳过下一个激活,以及让作业继续使用有限的作业队列。我们的实验结果表明,我们的设计方案——即探索可能错过最后期限的空间,并采用不同的策略处理——大大优于经典的控制设计技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DMAC: Deadline-Miss-Aware Control
The real-time implementation of periodic controllers requires solving a co-design problem, in which the choice of the controller sampling period is a crucial element. Classic design techniques limit the period exploration to safe values, that guarantee the correct execution of the controller alongside the remaining real-time load, i.e., ensuring that the controller worst-case response time does not exceed its deadline. This paper presents DMAC: the first formally-grounded controller design strategy that explores shorter periods, thus explicitly taking into account the possibility of missing deadlines. The design leverages information about the probability that specific sub-sequences of deadline misses are experienced. The result is a fixed controller, that on average works as the ideal clairvoyant time-varying controller that possesses knowledge of deadline hits and misses. We obtain a safe estimate of the hit and miss events using the scenario theory, that allows us to provide probabilistic guarantees. The paper analyzes controllers implemented using the Logical Execution Time paradigm and three different strategies to handle deadline miss events: killing the job, letting the job continue but skipping the next activation, and letting the job continue using a limited queue of jobs. Our experimental results show that our design proposal – i.e., that exploring the space where deadline can be missed and handled with different strategies – greatly outperforms classical control design techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Interference-Sensitive Run-time Adaptation of Time-Triggered Schedules Attack Detection Through Monitoring of Timing Deviations in Embedded Real-Time Systems Fixed-Priority Memory-Centric Scheduler for COTS-Based Multiprocessors Hiding Communication Delays in Contention-Free Execution for SPM-Based Multi-Core Architectures Response-Time Analysis of Limited-Preemptive Parallel DAG Tasks Under Global Scheduling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1