明确评估目标对研究型评估发展的启示

M. Vignal, Katherine Rainey, Bethany R. Wilcox, Marcos D. Caballero, H. Lewandowski
{"title":"明确评估目标对研究型评估发展的启示","authors":"M. Vignal, Katherine Rainey, Bethany R. Wilcox, Marcos D. Caballero, H. Lewandowski","doi":"10.1119/perc.2022.pr.vignal","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research-based assessments have historically been developed based on teaching experience and/or course learning goals or objectives. However, using course learning goals for assessment development has limitations, including that the goals for a course are often broad and difficult or impossible to assess with an individualized, scalable assessment instrument. Thus, we propose articulating assessment objectives (AOs), which are concise and specific statements about concepts and practices that an assessment aims to measure, as a productive strategy for assessment development. While similar in many respects to learning goals, AOs are explicitly designed to aid in assessment development in numerous ways, including by helping researchers organize high-level assessment goals, providing an additional means for establishing content validity, operationalizing the goals of the assessment via targeted assessment items, and serving as a way to communicate the substance of an assessment to instructors and researchers interested in using the assessment in their course or research study. Here, we discuss these affordances of AOs in the development of two recent research-based assessments, and we present two detailed examples of AOs and how we progressed from initial assessment concep-tion to AO articulation to finalized assessment items. We conclude by arguing that the articulation of AOs is a valuable step in the development of research-based assessments.","PeriodicalId":253382,"journal":{"name":"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affordances of Articulating Assessment Objectives in Research-based Assessment Development\",\"authors\":\"M. Vignal, Katherine Rainey, Bethany R. Wilcox, Marcos D. Caballero, H. Lewandowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1119/perc.2022.pr.vignal\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research-based assessments have historically been developed based on teaching experience and/or course learning goals or objectives. However, using course learning goals for assessment development has limitations, including that the goals for a course are often broad and difficult or impossible to assess with an individualized, scalable assessment instrument. Thus, we propose articulating assessment objectives (AOs), which are concise and specific statements about concepts and practices that an assessment aims to measure, as a productive strategy for assessment development. While similar in many respects to learning goals, AOs are explicitly designed to aid in assessment development in numerous ways, including by helping researchers organize high-level assessment goals, providing an additional means for establishing content validity, operationalizing the goals of the assessment via targeted assessment items, and serving as a way to communicate the substance of an assessment to instructors and researchers interested in using the assessment in their course or research study. Here, we discuss these affordances of AOs in the development of two recent research-based assessments, and we present two detailed examples of AOs and how we progressed from initial assessment concep-tion to AO articulation to finalized assessment items. We conclude by arguing that the articulation of AOs is a valuable step in the development of research-based assessments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2022.pr.vignal\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2022.pr.vignal","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

基于研究的评估历来是基于教学经验和/或课程学习目标或目的而开发的。然而,使用课程学习目标进行评估开发具有局限性,包括课程的目标通常是广泛的,难以或不可能使用个性化的,可扩展的评估工具进行评估。因此,我们提出明确的评估目标(ao),它是关于评估旨在度量的概念和实践的简洁和具体的陈述,作为评估发展的有效策略。虽然在许多方面与学习目标相似,但aoo的明确设计是为了在许多方面帮助评估发展,包括帮助研究人员组织高水平的评估目标,为建立内容效度提供额外的手段,通过有针对性的评估项目实现评估目标,并作为一种沟通评估的实质的方式,有兴趣在他们的课程或研究中使用评估的教师和研究人员。在这里,我们讨论了在最近的两个基于研究的评估的发展中aoo的这些功能,并给出了aoo的两个详细例子,以及我们如何从最初的评估概念发展到aoo的表达,再到最终的评估项目。最后,我们认为,在以研究为基础的评估发展中,aoo的表达是一个有价值的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Affordances of Articulating Assessment Objectives in Research-based Assessment Development
Research-based assessments have historically been developed based on teaching experience and/or course learning goals or objectives. However, using course learning goals for assessment development has limitations, including that the goals for a course are often broad and difficult or impossible to assess with an individualized, scalable assessment instrument. Thus, we propose articulating assessment objectives (AOs), which are concise and specific statements about concepts and practices that an assessment aims to measure, as a productive strategy for assessment development. While similar in many respects to learning goals, AOs are explicitly designed to aid in assessment development in numerous ways, including by helping researchers organize high-level assessment goals, providing an additional means for establishing content validity, operationalizing the goals of the assessment via targeted assessment items, and serving as a way to communicate the substance of an assessment to instructors and researchers interested in using the assessment in their course or research study. Here, we discuss these affordances of AOs in the development of two recent research-based assessments, and we present two detailed examples of AOs and how we progressed from initial assessment concep-tion to AO articulation to finalized assessment items. We conclude by arguing that the articulation of AOs is a valuable step in the development of research-based assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthesizing disabled physics students' pathways to access: a call for more access talk Analyzing Multiple-Choice-Multiple-Response Items Using Item Response Theory Methods for utilizing Item response theory with Coupled, Multiple-Response assessments Impact of mathematical reasoning on students� understanding of quantum optics Leveraging queer epistemic subjectivity to advance justice through physics teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1