{"title":"问题的“专家异端邪说'AH”申Ū论述中开始有ĪṠ:评估ibn al -Ḥ无礼Asqalā太太对Riw地位一具āal-Mubtadi”","authors":"Asep Nahrul Musadad dan Ismangil Ngarfillah","doi":"10.30762/UNIVERSUM.V10I1.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One of the key terms employed in showing the connection between jarh wa ta’dīl discourse and Islamic sectarianism issues is bid’ah “heresy” and al-mubtadi’ “heretic transmitter”. Start on preliminary introduction to bid’ah conception in the context of jarḥ wa ta’dīl, this article discusses Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalāni’s notions about the concept of heresy (bid’ah) and validity of heretic transmitter (riwāyat al-mubtadi’). Ibṇ Hajar was choosed here as the exponent of culmination in “ulūm al-hadītḣ” discourse in which the bid’ah notion was arguably reconsidered along with the still-functioning Islamic sectarianism polemic. It deals finally with “kafir” claims (takfīr) as the so-called “theological weapon” to blame others. Keywords; Ibnu Hajar al-‘Asqalāni, bid’ah, dan riwāyat al-mubtadi’","PeriodicalId":445413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Universum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLEMIK “AHLI BID’AH” DALAM WACANA ULŪMUL HADĪṠ: Evaluasi Ibnu Ḥajar al-‘Asqalāny Terhadap Status Riwāyat al-Mubtadi’\",\"authors\":\"Asep Nahrul Musadad dan Ismangil Ngarfillah\",\"doi\":\"10.30762/UNIVERSUM.V10I1.219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract One of the key terms employed in showing the connection between jarh wa ta’dīl discourse and Islamic sectarianism issues is bid’ah “heresy” and al-mubtadi’ “heretic transmitter”. Start on preliminary introduction to bid’ah conception in the context of jarḥ wa ta’dīl, this article discusses Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalāni’s notions about the concept of heresy (bid’ah) and validity of heretic transmitter (riwāyat al-mubtadi’). Ibṇ Hajar was choosed here as the exponent of culmination in “ulūm al-hadītḣ” discourse in which the bid’ah notion was arguably reconsidered along with the still-functioning Islamic sectarianism polemic. It deals finally with “kafir” claims (takfīr) as the so-called “theological weapon” to blame others. Keywords; Ibnu Hajar al-‘Asqalāni, bid’ah, dan riwāyat al-mubtadi’\",\"PeriodicalId\":445413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Universum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Universum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30762/UNIVERSUM.V10I1.219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Universum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30762/UNIVERSUM.V10I1.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要在论述伊斯兰教宗派主义与伊斯兰教宗派主义之间的关系时,使用的一个关键术语是“异端”和“异端传播者”。本文在对《jarjah ' wa ta ' d l》中“bid ' ah”概念进行初步介绍的基础上,讨论伊本Ḥajar al- Asqalāni关于异端(bid ' ah)概念和异端传播者(riwāyat al-mubtadi ')有效性的观点。ibha Hajar在这里被选为“ulūm al-hadītḣ”话语中高潮的代表,在这个话语中,bid 'ah的概念随着仍然在运作的伊斯兰宗派主义争论而被重新考虑。它最后处理了“kafir”声称(takf ā r)作为所谓的“神学武器”来指责他人。关键字;Ibnu Hajar al- ' Asqalāni, bid ' ah, dan riwāyat al-mubtadi '
POLEMIK “AHLI BID’AH” DALAM WACANA ULŪMUL HADĪṠ: Evaluasi Ibnu Ḥajar al-‘Asqalāny Terhadap Status Riwāyat al-Mubtadi’
Abstract One of the key terms employed in showing the connection between jarh wa ta’dīl discourse and Islamic sectarianism issues is bid’ah “heresy” and al-mubtadi’ “heretic transmitter”. Start on preliminary introduction to bid’ah conception in the context of jarḥ wa ta’dīl, this article discusses Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalāni’s notions about the concept of heresy (bid’ah) and validity of heretic transmitter (riwāyat al-mubtadi’). Ibṇ Hajar was choosed here as the exponent of culmination in “ulūm al-hadītḣ” discourse in which the bid’ah notion was arguably reconsidered along with the still-functioning Islamic sectarianism polemic. It deals finally with “kafir” claims (takfīr) as the so-called “theological weapon” to blame others. Keywords; Ibnu Hajar al-‘Asqalāni, bid’ah, dan riwāyat al-mubtadi’