可持续投资和回报的横截面和最大的缩减

Lisa R. Goldberg , Saad Mouti
{"title":"可持续投资和回报的横截面和最大的缩减","authors":"Lisa R. Goldberg ,&nbsp;Saad Mouti","doi":"10.1016/j.jfds.2022.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We use supervised learning to identify factors that predict the cross-section of returns and maximum drawdown for stocks in the US equity market. Our data run from January 1970 to December 2019 and our analysis includes ordinary least squares, penalized linear regressions, tree-based models, and neural networks. We find that the most important predictors tended to be consistent across models, and that non-linear models had better predictive power than linear models. Predictive power was higher in calm periods than in stressed periods. Environmental, social, and governance indicators marginally impacted the predictive power of non-linear models in our data, despite their negative correlation with maximum drawdown and positive correlation with returns. Upon exploring whether ESG variables are captured by some models, we find that ESG data contribute to the prediction nonetheless.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Finance and Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405918822000150/pdfft?md5=f4705e80b3e149e5335f70f6854e6a3e&pid=1-s2.0-S2405918822000150-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable investing and the cross-section of returns and maximum drawdown\",\"authors\":\"Lisa R. Goldberg ,&nbsp;Saad Mouti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfds.2022.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We use supervised learning to identify factors that predict the cross-section of returns and maximum drawdown for stocks in the US equity market. Our data run from January 1970 to December 2019 and our analysis includes ordinary least squares, penalized linear regressions, tree-based models, and neural networks. We find that the most important predictors tended to be consistent across models, and that non-linear models had better predictive power than linear models. Predictive power was higher in calm periods than in stressed periods. Environmental, social, and governance indicators marginally impacted the predictive power of non-linear models in our data, despite their negative correlation with maximum drawdown and positive correlation with returns. Upon exploring whether ESG variables are captured by some models, we find that ESG data contribute to the prediction nonetheless.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Finance and Data Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405918822000150/pdfft?md5=f4705e80b3e149e5335f70f6854e6a3e&pid=1-s2.0-S2405918822000150-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Finance and Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405918822000150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Finance and Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405918822000150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用监督学习来识别预测美国股票市场收益横截面和最大跌幅的因素。我们的数据从1970年1月到2019年12月,我们的分析包括普通最小二乘、惩罚线性回归、基于树的模型和神经网络。我们发现最重要的预测因子在各个模型之间趋于一致,非线性模型比线性模型具有更好的预测能力。平静时期的预测能力高于紧张时期。在我们的数据中,环境、社会和治理指标对非线性模型的预测能力影响不大,尽管它们与最大回撤率呈负相关,与收益呈正相关。在探索ESG变量是否被某些模型捕获后,我们发现ESG数据仍然有助于预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainable investing and the cross-section of returns and maximum drawdown

We use supervised learning to identify factors that predict the cross-section of returns and maximum drawdown for stocks in the US equity market. Our data run from January 1970 to December 2019 and our analysis includes ordinary least squares, penalized linear regressions, tree-based models, and neural networks. We find that the most important predictors tended to be consistent across models, and that non-linear models had better predictive power than linear models. Predictive power was higher in calm periods than in stressed periods. Environmental, social, and governance indicators marginally impacted the predictive power of non-linear models in our data, despite their negative correlation with maximum drawdown and positive correlation with returns. Upon exploring whether ESG variables are captured by some models, we find that ESG data contribute to the prediction nonetheless.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Finance and Data Science
Journal of Finance and Data Science Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 days
期刊最新文献
Liquidity risk analysis via drawdown-based measures Reinforcement prompting for financial synthetic data generation Research on credit card default repayment prediction model CPC-SAX: Data mining of financial chart patterns with symbolic aggregate approXimation and instance-based multilabel classification Explicit formulae for the valuation of European options with price impacts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1