转型经济体的公司治理解决方案:收购协议中的陈述和保证

Diana Pop
{"title":"转型经济体的公司治理解决方案:收购协议中的陈述和保证","authors":"Diana Pop","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.914173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decline of stoc k markets in the transition economies must make the phenomenon of ownership concentration go hand in hand with a more important due diligence and a search for solutions preserving the channel of external financing. In the absence of concrete formal pro- cedures that pay back the restructuring effort, majority owners decisively affect the allocation of companies' wealth in detrimental of small shareholders. When mandatory bid rule is effective, completing takeovers at high prices makes capital markets shrink, affecting on long term the mere capitalist conception of the economic regime of transition economies. Some new forms of en- forcement mechanisms have to be proposed in order to mitigate the classical corporate governance conflict between large and minority shareholders. Our approach aims to investigate an option asking for private law enforcement, which could encourage controlling shareholder to disclose the real status of the business being sold: representation and warranties in takeover agreements. In this respect, we propose a screening model, in the case of a cash—financing acquisition. The pur- pose of this formalization is to determine the features of the acquisition contract in equilibrium, defined by the amount of cash offered for control and by the fraction of liability assumed by the target in two different contexts: (i) when the buyer and the target have the same information; and (ii) when information asymmetry arises between the two parties. The model provides some theoretical predictions concerning the optimal amount of cash, the acquisition premium, and the overpayment of the target. It also contributes to the debate on the type of legal changes relevant for transition economies. JEL classification: G32; G34; L14","PeriodicalId":163698,"journal":{"name":"Institutional & Transition Economics eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Governance Solutions for Transition Economies: Representations and Warranties in Takeover Agreements\",\"authors\":\"Diana Pop\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.914173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The decline of stoc k markets in the transition economies must make the phenomenon of ownership concentration go hand in hand with a more important due diligence and a search for solutions preserving the channel of external financing. In the absence of concrete formal pro- cedures that pay back the restructuring effort, majority owners decisively affect the allocation of companies' wealth in detrimental of small shareholders. When mandatory bid rule is effective, completing takeovers at high prices makes capital markets shrink, affecting on long term the mere capitalist conception of the economic regime of transition economies. Some new forms of en- forcement mechanisms have to be proposed in order to mitigate the classical corporate governance conflict between large and minority shareholders. Our approach aims to investigate an option asking for private law enforcement, which could encourage controlling shareholder to disclose the real status of the business being sold: representation and warranties in takeover agreements. In this respect, we propose a screening model, in the case of a cash—financing acquisition. The pur- pose of this formalization is to determine the features of the acquisition contract in equilibrium, defined by the amount of cash offered for control and by the fraction of liability assumed by the target in two different contexts: (i) when the buyer and the target have the same information; and (ii) when information asymmetry arises between the two parties. The model provides some theoretical predictions concerning the optimal amount of cash, the acquisition premium, and the overpayment of the target. It also contributes to the debate on the type of legal changes relevant for transition economies. JEL classification: G32; G34; L14\",\"PeriodicalId\":163698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institutional & Transition Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institutional & Transition Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.914173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutional & Transition Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.914173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转型期经济中股票市场的衰落必须使所有权集中现象与更重要的尽职调查和寻求保持外部融资渠道的解决办法同时发生。在缺乏具体的正式程序来回报重组努力的情况下,多数股东决定性地影响了公司财富的分配,不利于小股东。当强制投标规则有效时,以高价完成收购会使资本市场萎缩,长期影响转型经济体经济体制的纯粹资本主义概念。为了缓解大股东和小股东之间的传统公司治理冲突,必须提出一些新的执行机制形式。我们的方法旨在调查一种要求私人执法的选择,这可能会鼓励控股股东披露被出售业务的真实状况:收购协议中的陈述和保证。在这方面,我们提出了一种现金融资收购的筛选模型。这种形式化的目的是确定均衡收购合同的特征,由两种不同情况下为控制权提供的现金数量和目标方承担的责任比例来定义:(i)当买方和目标方拥有相同的信息时;(二)双方发生信息不对称时。该模型对收购目标的最优现金量、收购溢价和超额支付提供了一些理论预测。它还有助于就与转型经济有关的法律变革类型进行辩论。JEL分类:G32;G34;L14
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate Governance Solutions for Transition Economies: Representations and Warranties in Takeover Agreements
The decline of stoc k markets in the transition economies must make the phenomenon of ownership concentration go hand in hand with a more important due diligence and a search for solutions preserving the channel of external financing. In the absence of concrete formal pro- cedures that pay back the restructuring effort, majority owners decisively affect the allocation of companies' wealth in detrimental of small shareholders. When mandatory bid rule is effective, completing takeovers at high prices makes capital markets shrink, affecting on long term the mere capitalist conception of the economic regime of transition economies. Some new forms of en- forcement mechanisms have to be proposed in order to mitigate the classical corporate governance conflict between large and minority shareholders. Our approach aims to investigate an option asking for private law enforcement, which could encourage controlling shareholder to disclose the real status of the business being sold: representation and warranties in takeover agreements. In this respect, we propose a screening model, in the case of a cash—financing acquisition. The pur- pose of this formalization is to determine the features of the acquisition contract in equilibrium, defined by the amount of cash offered for control and by the fraction of liability assumed by the target in two different contexts: (i) when the buyer and the target have the same information; and (ii) when information asymmetry arises between the two parties. The model provides some theoretical predictions concerning the optimal amount of cash, the acquisition premium, and the overpayment of the target. It also contributes to the debate on the type of legal changes relevant for transition economies. JEL classification: G32; G34; L14
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Foreign Aid Fails Informal Finance: A Theory of Moneylenders Do Institutions Not Matter in China? Evidence from Manufacturing Enterprises Two Russian Stock Exchanges: Analysis of Relationships Human Capital Externalities Evidence from the Transition Economy of Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1