有效演讲者和无效演讲者的演讲对听力测试成绩影响的调查

L. Barker, Kittie W. Watson, R. J. Kibler
{"title":"有效演讲者和无效演讲者的演讲对听力测试成绩影响的调查","authors":"L. Barker, Kittie W. Watson, R. J. Kibler","doi":"10.1080/10417948409372608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research investigating effects of differences in the administration of listening tests on test scores gives conflicting results. This study was designed to measure relative effects of “effective” and “ineffective” speakers presenting the Brown‐Carlsen and STEP tests on listening test scores. Analyses of the test scores found statistically significant differences between subjects hearing “effective” and “ineffective” speaker presentations for both the Brown‐Carlsen and STEP tests. Since subjects hearing “effective” speakers scored higher on both tests, results suggest variables such as “effective” speaker presentations positively influence listening test score results. Future research validating dimensions of administering listening tests seems necessary.","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of the effect of presentations by effective and ineffective speakers on listening test scores\",\"authors\":\"L. Barker, Kittie W. Watson, R. J. Kibler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417948409372608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research investigating effects of differences in the administration of listening tests on test scores gives conflicting results. This study was designed to measure relative effects of “effective” and “ineffective” speakers presenting the Brown‐Carlsen and STEP tests on listening test scores. Analyses of the test scores found statistically significant differences between subjects hearing “effective” and “ineffective” speaker presentations for both the Brown‐Carlsen and STEP tests. Since subjects hearing “effective” speakers scored higher on both tests, results suggest variables such as “effective” speaker presentations positively influence listening test score results. Future research validating dimensions of administering listening tests seems necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948409372608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948409372608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

调查听力测试管理差异对考试成绩影响的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在测量“有效”和“无效”演讲者在Brown - Carlsen和STEP测试中对听力测试成绩的相对影响。对测试分数的分析发现,在Brown - Carlsen和STEP测试中,听到“有效”和“无效”演讲者演讲的受试者之间存在统计学上的显著差异。由于听到“有效”演讲者的受试者在两项测试中得分都较高,结果表明,“有效”演讲者的演讲等变量对听力测试分数结果有积极影响。未来的研究验证管理听力测试的维度似乎是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An investigation of the effect of presentations by effective and ineffective speakers on listening test scores
Research investigating effects of differences in the administration of listening tests on test scores gives conflicting results. This study was designed to measure relative effects of “effective” and “ineffective” speakers presenting the Brown‐Carlsen and STEP tests on listening test scores. Analyses of the test scores found statistically significant differences between subjects hearing “effective” and “ineffective” speaker presentations for both the Brown‐Carlsen and STEP tests. Since subjects hearing “effective” speakers scored higher on both tests, results suggest variables such as “effective” speaker presentations positively influence listening test score results. Future research validating dimensions of administering listening tests seems necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Whither applied interpersonal communication research: A practical perspective for practicing practitioners The importance of context in applied communication research Relational communication in applied contexts: Current status and future directions Differences in how physicians and patients perceive physicians’ relational communication Privacy in marital relationships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1