混合自动机的一致性测试

Hendrik Roehm, Jens Oehlerking, M. Woehrle, M. Althoff
{"title":"混合自动机的一致性测试","authors":"Hendrik Roehm, Jens Oehlerking, M. Woehrle, M. Althoff","doi":"10.1145/2883817.2883828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Industrial-sized hybrid systems are typically not amenable to formal verification techniques. For this reason, a common approach is to formally verify abstractions of (parts of) the original system. However, we need to show that this abstraction conforms to the actual system implementation including its physical dynamics. In particular, verified properties of the abstract system need to transfer to the implementation. To this end, we introduce a formal conformance relation, called reachset conformance, which guarantees transference of safety properties, while being a weaker relation than the existing trace inclusion conformance. Based on this formal relation, we present a conformance testing method which allows us to tune the trade-off between accuracy and computational load. Additionally, we present a test selection algorithm that uses a coverage measure to reduce the number of test cases for conformance testing. We experimentally show the benefits of our novel techniques based on an example from autonomous driving.","PeriodicalId":337926,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reachset Conformance Testing of Hybrid Automata\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Roehm, Jens Oehlerking, M. Woehrle, M. Althoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2883817.2883828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Industrial-sized hybrid systems are typically not amenable to formal verification techniques. For this reason, a common approach is to formally verify abstractions of (parts of) the original system. However, we need to show that this abstraction conforms to the actual system implementation including its physical dynamics. In particular, verified properties of the abstract system need to transfer to the implementation. To this end, we introduce a formal conformance relation, called reachset conformance, which guarantees transference of safety properties, while being a weaker relation than the existing trace inclusion conformance. Based on this formal relation, we present a conformance testing method which allows us to tune the trade-off between accuracy and computational load. Additionally, we present a test selection algorithm that uses a coverage measure to reduce the number of test cases for conformance testing. We experimentally show the benefits of our novel techniques based on an example from autonomous driving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2883817.2883828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2883817.2883828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

工业规模的混合系统通常不适合正式的验证技术。出于这个原因,一种常见的方法是正式地验证原始系统(部分)的抽象。然而,我们需要显示这个抽象符合实际的系统实现,包括它的物理动态。特别是,需要将抽象系统的验证属性转移到实现中。为此,我们引入了一种形式化的一致性关系,称为reachset一致性,它保证了安全属性的转移,同时是一种弱于现有的跟踪包含一致性的关系。基于这种形式化关系,我们提出了一种一致性测试方法,该方法允许我们在精度和计算负载之间进行权衡。此外,我们提出了一种测试选择算法,该算法使用覆盖度量来减少一致性测试的测试用例数量。我们以自动驾驶为例,通过实验证明了我们的新技术的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reachset Conformance Testing of Hybrid Automata
Industrial-sized hybrid systems are typically not amenable to formal verification techniques. For this reason, a common approach is to formally verify abstractions of (parts of) the original system. However, we need to show that this abstraction conforms to the actual system implementation including its physical dynamics. In particular, verified properties of the abstract system need to transfer to the implementation. To this end, we introduce a formal conformance relation, called reachset conformance, which guarantees transference of safety properties, while being a weaker relation than the existing trace inclusion conformance. Based on this formal relation, we present a conformance testing method which allows us to tune the trade-off between accuracy and computational load. Additionally, we present a test selection algorithm that uses a coverage measure to reduce the number of test cases for conformance testing. We experimentally show the benefits of our novel techniques based on an example from autonomous driving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formal Analysis of Robustness at Model and Code Level Robust Asymptotic Stabilization of Hybrid Systems using Control Lyapunov Functions SCOTS: A Tool for the Synthesis of Symbolic Controllers Case Studies in Data-Driven Verification of Dynamical Systems Parallelotope Bundles for Polynomial Reachability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1