消费者选择中的大胆与胆怯之分

Michal Maimaran
{"title":"消费者选择中的大胆与胆怯之分","authors":"Michal Maimaran","doi":"10.1037/e722852011-070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose that many seemingly different choice problems consumers make involve fundamentally similar options. Specifically, we argue that across a wide range of problems some options represent more \" timid \" choices (e.g., compromise, safe, and standard options) whereas other options represent more \" bold \" choices (e.g., extreme, risky, and unique options). The tendency to select a more timid or bold option is affected by situational cues which trigger a more timid or bold mindset. Several studies demonstrate this distinction between options and the correspondence between mindsets and choice behavior. 3 In consumer decision making research and decision research more generally, the focus tends to be on studying individual phenomena, such as identifying conditions that affect preference for compromise options (e. 1990), or unique options. However, a closer examination suggests that there are some basic similarities in the options consumers face in seemingly unrelated choice problems. For example, in some respects, choosing an extreme option can be seen as related to choosing a risky gamble, a unique option, and a hedonic option. Similarly, compromise options, safe options, standard, and utilitarian options have common features and reflect related choice tendencies. In this research we try to identify such cross-problem similarities, which might allow us to offer more parsimonious explanations and identify factors that moderate choice behavior across seemingly unrelated problem types. In particular, we propose that some options represent more 'timid' choices, and some represent more 'bold' choices. Choosing compromise, safe, utilitarian, and standard options represent 'timid' choice behavior. Options of this type represent conventional behavior, a desire to fit in, and avoidance of risks. On the other hand, choosing options such as extremes, risky gambles, hedonic options, and unique options represent 'bold' choice behavior. These 'bold' options can be seen as involving more unconventional selections, standing for one's beliefs, and taking risks. Moreover, choosing this type of options may serve to better express one's desires and tastes. 4 Furthermore, consumers' tendency to select a more timid or bold option across problem types may be systematically affected by (1) situational factors which trigger certain mindsets and (2) individual differences. For example, situational cues that trigger self expression or create a unique environment may create a 'bold' mindset which in turn leads consumers to choose more 'bold' options. Moreover, consumers may have a basic tendency to make more bold or timid actions, regardless of the situation. Our conceptual distinction between timid …","PeriodicalId":268180,"journal":{"name":"ACR North American Advances","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Bold – Timid Divide in Consumer Choice\",\"authors\":\"Michal Maimaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e722852011-070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose that many seemingly different choice problems consumers make involve fundamentally similar options. Specifically, we argue that across a wide range of problems some options represent more \\\" timid \\\" choices (e.g., compromise, safe, and standard options) whereas other options represent more \\\" bold \\\" choices (e.g., extreme, risky, and unique options). The tendency to select a more timid or bold option is affected by situational cues which trigger a more timid or bold mindset. Several studies demonstrate this distinction between options and the correspondence between mindsets and choice behavior. 3 In consumer decision making research and decision research more generally, the focus tends to be on studying individual phenomena, such as identifying conditions that affect preference for compromise options (e. 1990), or unique options. However, a closer examination suggests that there are some basic similarities in the options consumers face in seemingly unrelated choice problems. For example, in some respects, choosing an extreme option can be seen as related to choosing a risky gamble, a unique option, and a hedonic option. Similarly, compromise options, safe options, standard, and utilitarian options have common features and reflect related choice tendencies. In this research we try to identify such cross-problem similarities, which might allow us to offer more parsimonious explanations and identify factors that moderate choice behavior across seemingly unrelated problem types. In particular, we propose that some options represent more 'timid' choices, and some represent more 'bold' choices. Choosing compromise, safe, utilitarian, and standard options represent 'timid' choice behavior. Options of this type represent conventional behavior, a desire to fit in, and avoidance of risks. On the other hand, choosing options such as extremes, risky gambles, hedonic options, and unique options represent 'bold' choice behavior. These 'bold' options can be seen as involving more unconventional selections, standing for one's beliefs, and taking risks. Moreover, choosing this type of options may serve to better express one's desires and tastes. 4 Furthermore, consumers' tendency to select a more timid or bold option across problem types may be systematically affected by (1) situational factors which trigger certain mindsets and (2) individual differences. For example, situational cues that trigger self expression or create a unique environment may create a 'bold' mindset which in turn leads consumers to choose more 'bold' options. Moreover, consumers may have a basic tendency to make more bold or timid actions, regardless of the situation. Our conceptual distinction between timid …\",\"PeriodicalId\":268180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACR North American Advances\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACR North American Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e722852011-070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR North American Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e722852011-070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们认为,消费者面临的许多看似不同的选择问题,其实包含着本质上相似的选择。具体来说,我们认为在广泛的问题中,一些选项代表更“胆小”的选择(例如,妥协,安全和标准选项),而其他选项代表更“大胆”的选择(例如,极端,冒险和独特的选项)。选择更胆小或更大胆的选择的倾向受到触发更胆小或更大胆心态的情境线索的影响。一些研究证明了选择之间的区别,以及心态和选择行为之间的对应关系。3 .在消费者决策研究和更一般的决策研究中,重点往往是研究个别现象,例如确定影响折衷选择偏好的条件(如1990年)或独特选择。然而,更仔细的研究表明,在看似不相关的选择问题中,消费者面临的选择有一些基本的相似之处。例如,在某些方面,选择一个极端的选择可以被看作是选择一个冒险的赌博,一个独特的选择,和一个快乐的选择。同样,妥协选项、安全选项、标准选项和功利选项具有共同的特征,反映了相关的选择倾向。在这项研究中,我们试图确定这种跨问题的相似性,这可能使我们能够提供更简洁的解释,并确定在看似不相关的问题类型中调节选择行为的因素。特别是,我们建议一些选项代表更“胆小”的选择,而另一些则代表更“大胆”的选择。选择妥协、安全、功利和标准选项代表“胆怯”的选择行为。这种类型的选择代表了传统的行为、适应的愿望和对风险的规避。另一方面,选择极端、冒险赌博、享乐选择和独特选择等选项代表“大胆”的选择行为。这些“大胆”的选择可以被视为涉及更多非常规的选择,坚持自己的信仰,并承担风险。此外,选择这种类型的选项可以更好地表达一个人的欲望和品味。此外,消费者倾向于在问题类型中选择更胆小或更大胆的选项可能受到(1)触发某些心态的情境因素和(2)个体差异的系统影响。例如,触发自我表达或创造独特环境的情境线索可能会创造一种“大胆”的心态,从而导致消费者做出更“大胆”的选择。此外,消费者可能有一种基本倾向,即无论情况如何,都采取更大胆或更胆小的行动。我们在概念上区分胆小…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Bold – Timid Divide in Consumer Choice
We propose that many seemingly different choice problems consumers make involve fundamentally similar options. Specifically, we argue that across a wide range of problems some options represent more " timid " choices (e.g., compromise, safe, and standard options) whereas other options represent more " bold " choices (e.g., extreme, risky, and unique options). The tendency to select a more timid or bold option is affected by situational cues which trigger a more timid or bold mindset. Several studies demonstrate this distinction between options and the correspondence between mindsets and choice behavior. 3 In consumer decision making research and decision research more generally, the focus tends to be on studying individual phenomena, such as identifying conditions that affect preference for compromise options (e. 1990), or unique options. However, a closer examination suggests that there are some basic similarities in the options consumers face in seemingly unrelated choice problems. For example, in some respects, choosing an extreme option can be seen as related to choosing a risky gamble, a unique option, and a hedonic option. Similarly, compromise options, safe options, standard, and utilitarian options have common features and reflect related choice tendencies. In this research we try to identify such cross-problem similarities, which might allow us to offer more parsimonious explanations and identify factors that moderate choice behavior across seemingly unrelated problem types. In particular, we propose that some options represent more 'timid' choices, and some represent more 'bold' choices. Choosing compromise, safe, utilitarian, and standard options represent 'timid' choice behavior. Options of this type represent conventional behavior, a desire to fit in, and avoidance of risks. On the other hand, choosing options such as extremes, risky gambles, hedonic options, and unique options represent 'bold' choice behavior. These 'bold' options can be seen as involving more unconventional selections, standing for one's beliefs, and taking risks. Moreover, choosing this type of options may serve to better express one's desires and tastes. 4 Furthermore, consumers' tendency to select a more timid or bold option across problem types may be systematically affected by (1) situational factors which trigger certain mindsets and (2) individual differences. For example, situational cues that trigger self expression or create a unique environment may create a 'bold' mindset which in turn leads consumers to choose more 'bold' options. Moreover, consumers may have a basic tendency to make more bold or timid actions, regardless of the situation. Our conceptual distinction between timid …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial behavior among young adult consumers: the influence of self-determination and financial psychology Warm or Cold? The Effect of Color Temperature of Logo on Evaluation of For-Profits and Nonprofits When Sharing Isn’t Caring: The Influence of Seeking The Best on Sharing Favorable Word of Mouth about Unsatisfactory Purchases Birds of a Feather Feel Together: Emotional Ability Similarity in Consumer Interactions Goal Conflict Encourages Work and Discourages Leisure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1