随机化协议的子线性消息边界

John E. Augustine, A. R. Molla, Gopal Pandurangan
{"title":"随机化协议的子线性消息边界","authors":"John E. Augustine, A. R. Molla, Gopal Pandurangan","doi":"10.1145/3212734.3212751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on understanding the message complexity of randomized agreement in synchronous distributed networks. We focus on the so-called implicit agreement problem where each node starts with an input value (0 or 1) and at the end one or more nodes should decide on a common input value which should be equal to some node's input value (there can be undecided nodes). Implicit agreement is a generalization of the fundamental agreement and leader election problems. We present sublinear (in n, where n is the number of nodes) algorithms and lower bounds on the message complexity of implicit agreement in fully-connected (i.e., complete) networks. Specifically our main results are: We show that for any implicit agreement algorithm that succeeds with probability at least 1 - ε, for some suitably small constant ε > 0, needs at least Ω(n0.5) messages with constant probability. This bound holds regardless of the number of rounds used and applies to both LOCAL and CONGEST models. This lower bound is essentially tight for complete networks, as there exists a randomized agreement algorithm that uses only Õ (n0.5) messages1 with high probability2 and runs inO(1) rounds and succeeds with high probability. Both the upper and lower bounds assume that nodes have access to (only) private coins. In contrast to the above bounds, if nodes have access to an unbiased global (shared) coin, we present a randomized algorithm which, with high probability, achieves implicit agreement, and uses Õ (n0.4) messages in expectation and runs in O(1) rounds (deterministically). This algorithm works in the CONGEST model as well. Our result shows the power of a global coin in significantly improving (by a polynomial factor) the message complexity of agreement. As another contrast, we show that the same benefit does not apply to leader election, i.e., even with access to a global coin, Ω(n0.5) messages (in expectation) are needed for any leader election algorithm that succeeds with probability at least 1 - ε, for a small constant ε > 0. We extend our results to a natural generalization of agreement called as subset agreement where a given (non-empty) subset of nodes should agree on a common value. We show that subset agreement on a subset of size k nodes can be accomplished by a randomized algorithm that succeeds with high probability, and uses (in expecation) Õ (min{kn0.5,n}) (using only private coins) and Õ (min{kn0.4,n}) messages (using global coin) respectively","PeriodicalId":198284,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sublinear Message Bounds for Randomized Agreement\",\"authors\":\"John E. Augustine, A. R. Molla, Gopal Pandurangan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3212734.3212751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on understanding the message complexity of randomized agreement in synchronous distributed networks. We focus on the so-called implicit agreement problem where each node starts with an input value (0 or 1) and at the end one or more nodes should decide on a common input value which should be equal to some node's input value (there can be undecided nodes). Implicit agreement is a generalization of the fundamental agreement and leader election problems. We present sublinear (in n, where n is the number of nodes) algorithms and lower bounds on the message complexity of implicit agreement in fully-connected (i.e., complete) networks. Specifically our main results are: We show that for any implicit agreement algorithm that succeeds with probability at least 1 - ε, for some suitably small constant ε > 0, needs at least Ω(n0.5) messages with constant probability. This bound holds regardless of the number of rounds used and applies to both LOCAL and CONGEST models. This lower bound is essentially tight for complete networks, as there exists a randomized agreement algorithm that uses only Õ (n0.5) messages1 with high probability2 and runs inO(1) rounds and succeeds with high probability. Both the upper and lower bounds assume that nodes have access to (only) private coins. In contrast to the above bounds, if nodes have access to an unbiased global (shared) coin, we present a randomized algorithm which, with high probability, achieves implicit agreement, and uses Õ (n0.4) messages in expectation and runs in O(1) rounds (deterministically). This algorithm works in the CONGEST model as well. Our result shows the power of a global coin in significantly improving (by a polynomial factor) the message complexity of agreement. As another contrast, we show that the same benefit does not apply to leader election, i.e., even with access to a global coin, Ω(n0.5) messages (in expectation) are needed for any leader election algorithm that succeeds with probability at least 1 - ε, for a small constant ε > 0. We extend our results to a natural generalization of agreement called as subset agreement where a given (non-empty) subset of nodes should agree on a common value. We show that subset agreement on a subset of size k nodes can be accomplished by a randomized algorithm that succeeds with high probability, and uses (in expecation) Õ (min{kn0.5,n}) (using only private coins) and Õ (min{kn0.4,n}) messages (using global coin) respectively\",\"PeriodicalId\":198284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3212734.3212751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3212734.3212751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文主要研究同步分布式网络中随机协议的消息复杂度。我们关注所谓的隐式协议问题,其中每个节点从一个输入值(0或1)开始,最后一个或多个节点应该决定一个公共输入值,该输入值应该等于某些节点的输入值(可能存在未决定的节点)。隐性协议是基本协议和领导人选举问题的概括。我们提出了次线性(在n中,其中n是节点数)算法和全连接(即完全)网络中隐式协议的消息复杂度的下界。具体来说,我们的主要结果是:我们表明,对于任何以概率至少为1 - ε成功的隐式协议算法,对于一些适当的小常数ε > 0,至少需要具有恒定概率的Ω(n0.5)消息。无论使用的轮数如何,这个边界都适用于LOCAL和CONGEST模型。对于完整的网络来说,这个下限本质上是严格的,因为存在一种随机协议算法,它只使用Õ (n0.5) messages1的概率很高2,运行inO(1)轮并以高概率成功。上界和下界都假设节点只能访问私有币。与上述边界相反,如果节点可以访问无偏全局(共享)硬币,我们提出了一种随机算法,该算法在高概率下实现隐式协议,并在预期中使用Õ (n0.4)消息,并以O(1)轮(确定性)运行。该算法也适用于CONGEST模型。我们的结果表明,全球币在显着提高(通过多项式因子)协议消息复杂性方面的能力。作为另一个对比,我们表明同样的好处并不适用于领导者选举,即,即使访问全局硬币,对于一个小常数ε > 0,任何以概率至少为1 - ε成功的领导者选举算法都需要Ω(n0.5)消息(在期望中)。我们将我们的结果扩展到称为子集协议的协议的自然概括,其中给定的(非空的)节点子集应该在公共值上达成一致。我们证明,在大小为k的节点子集上的子集协议可以通过一个随机算法来完成,该算法以高概率成功,并分别使用(预期)Õ (min{kn0.5,n})(仅使用私有币)和Õ (min{kn0.4,n})消息(使用全局币)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sublinear Message Bounds for Randomized Agreement
This paper focuses on understanding the message complexity of randomized agreement in synchronous distributed networks. We focus on the so-called implicit agreement problem where each node starts with an input value (0 or 1) and at the end one or more nodes should decide on a common input value which should be equal to some node's input value (there can be undecided nodes). Implicit agreement is a generalization of the fundamental agreement and leader election problems. We present sublinear (in n, where n is the number of nodes) algorithms and lower bounds on the message complexity of implicit agreement in fully-connected (i.e., complete) networks. Specifically our main results are: We show that for any implicit agreement algorithm that succeeds with probability at least 1 - ε, for some suitably small constant ε > 0, needs at least Ω(n0.5) messages with constant probability. This bound holds regardless of the number of rounds used and applies to both LOCAL and CONGEST models. This lower bound is essentially tight for complete networks, as there exists a randomized agreement algorithm that uses only Õ (n0.5) messages1 with high probability2 and runs inO(1) rounds and succeeds with high probability. Both the upper and lower bounds assume that nodes have access to (only) private coins. In contrast to the above bounds, if nodes have access to an unbiased global (shared) coin, we present a randomized algorithm which, with high probability, achieves implicit agreement, and uses Õ (n0.4) messages in expectation and runs in O(1) rounds (deterministically). This algorithm works in the CONGEST model as well. Our result shows the power of a global coin in significantly improving (by a polynomial factor) the message complexity of agreement. As another contrast, we show that the same benefit does not apply to leader election, i.e., even with access to a global coin, Ω(n0.5) messages (in expectation) are needed for any leader election algorithm that succeeds with probability at least 1 - ε, for a small constant ε > 0. We extend our results to a natural generalization of agreement called as subset agreement where a given (non-empty) subset of nodes should agree on a common value. We show that subset agreement on a subset of size k nodes can be accomplished by a randomized algorithm that succeeds with high probability, and uses (in expecation) Õ (min{kn0.5,n}) (using only private coins) and Õ (min{kn0.4,n}) messages (using global coin) respectively
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tutorial: Consistency Choices in Modern Distributed Systems Locking Timestamps versus Locking Objects Recoverable Mutual Exclusion Under System-Wide Failures Nesting-Safe Recoverable Linearizability: Modular Constructions for Non-Volatile Memory Brief Announcement: Beeping a Time-Optimal Leader Election
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1