在现代信息科学中,可用信息作为检索的默示前提

Miguel Said Vieira
{"title":"在现代信息科学中,可用信息作为检索的默示前提","authors":"Miguel Said Vieira","doi":"10.18617/liinc.v6i2.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resumo Identifica como objetivo da ciencia da informacao — a partir de BUSH — sanar a explosao informacional por meio da recuperacao da informacao disponivel; argumenta que o campo, embora venha problematizando a significacao dessa informacao, ainda coloca pouca enfase nos processos (exemplificados pela propriedade intelectual) que pre-determinam as informacoes disponiveis em um sistema. Sugere que a concepcao de ecologia informacional (SARACEVIC) pode ser relevante para recolocar a questao do acesso ao conhecimento, mas com ressalvas; e que nesse sentido o ambientalismo informacional (BOYLE) e os estudos sobre bens comuns intelectuais sao caminhos importantes para estudo. Palavras-chave acesso ao conhecimento; informacao disponivel; propriedade intelectual; ambientalismo informacional; bens comuns intelectuais Abstract The article identifies as an objective of information science – since BUSH – to remedy the informational explosion through the retrieval of available information; argues that although the field has been questioning the meaningfulness of this information, it still places little emphasis on the processes (such as intellectual property) that predetermine the information available in a system. It suggests that the conception of informational ecology (SARACEVIC) can be relevant to restate the issue of access to knowledge, but with reservations; and that, in that sense, informational environmentalism (BOYLE) and studies on intellectual commons are important research pathways. Keywords access to knowledge; available information; intellectual property; informational environmentalism; intellectual commons.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A informação disponível como pressuposto tácito da recuperação na ciência da informação moderna (Available Information as a Tacit Precondition of Retrieval in Modern Information Science)\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Said Vieira\",\"doi\":\"10.18617/liinc.v6i2.357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resumo Identifica como objetivo da ciencia da informacao — a partir de BUSH — sanar a explosao informacional por meio da recuperacao da informacao disponivel; argumenta que o campo, embora venha problematizando a significacao dessa informacao, ainda coloca pouca enfase nos processos (exemplificados pela propriedade intelectual) que pre-determinam as informacoes disponiveis em um sistema. Sugere que a concepcao de ecologia informacional (SARACEVIC) pode ser relevante para recolocar a questao do acesso ao conhecimento, mas com ressalvas; e que nesse sentido o ambientalismo informacional (BOYLE) e os estudos sobre bens comuns intelectuais sao caminhos importantes para estudo. Palavras-chave acesso ao conhecimento; informacao disponivel; propriedade intelectual; ambientalismo informacional; bens comuns intelectuais Abstract The article identifies as an objective of information science – since BUSH – to remedy the informational explosion through the retrieval of available information; argues that although the field has been questioning the meaningfulness of this information, it still places little emphasis on the processes (such as intellectual property) that predetermine the information available in a system. It suggests that the conception of informational ecology (SARACEVIC) can be relevant to restate the issue of access to knowledge, but with reservations; and that, in that sense, informational environmentalism (BOYLE) and studies on intellectual commons are important research pathways. Keywords access to knowledge; available information; intellectual property; informational environmentalism; intellectual commons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v6i2.357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v6i2.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要确定了信息科学的目标——从布什开始——通过恢复可用的信息来治愈信息爆炸;他认为,尽管该领域一直在质疑这些信息的意义,但它仍然很少强调预先决定系统中可用信息的过程(以知识产权为例)。建议信息生态学的概念(SARACEVIC)可能与重新提出获取知识的问题有关,但有条件;从这个意义上说,信息环境主义(博伊尔)和知识公地研究是重要的研究途径。关键词知识获取;对于防护服;知识产权;环保信息;《知识公地摘要》这篇文章自布什以来被确定为信息科学的一个目标,即通过检索现有信息来纠正信息爆炸;他认为,尽管该领域对这一信息的意义提出了质疑,但它仍然很少强调预先决定系统中可获得的信息的程序(如知识产权)。它建议,信息生态学的概念(SARACEVIC)可能与保留获取知识的问题有关,但有保留;在这方面,信息环境主义(BOYLE)和知识共享研究是重要的研究途径。关键词获取知识;可用的信息;知识产权;信息environmentalism;知识共享许可协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A informação disponível como pressuposto tácito da recuperação na ciência da informação moderna (Available Information as a Tacit Precondition of Retrieval in Modern Information Science)
Resumo Identifica como objetivo da ciencia da informacao — a partir de BUSH — sanar a explosao informacional por meio da recuperacao da informacao disponivel; argumenta que o campo, embora venha problematizando a significacao dessa informacao, ainda coloca pouca enfase nos processos (exemplificados pela propriedade intelectual) que pre-determinam as informacoes disponiveis em um sistema. Sugere que a concepcao de ecologia informacional (SARACEVIC) pode ser relevante para recolocar a questao do acesso ao conhecimento, mas com ressalvas; e que nesse sentido o ambientalismo informacional (BOYLE) e os estudos sobre bens comuns intelectuais sao caminhos importantes para estudo. Palavras-chave acesso ao conhecimento; informacao disponivel; propriedade intelectual; ambientalismo informacional; bens comuns intelectuais Abstract The article identifies as an objective of information science – since BUSH – to remedy the informational explosion through the retrieval of available information; argues that although the field has been questioning the meaningfulness of this information, it still places little emphasis on the processes (such as intellectual property) that predetermine the information available in a system. It suggests that the conception of informational ecology (SARACEVIC) can be relevant to restate the issue of access to knowledge, but with reservations; and that, in that sense, informational environmentalism (BOYLE) and studies on intellectual commons are important research pathways. Keywords access to knowledge; available information; intellectual property; informational environmentalism; intellectual commons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Responses to Cross-border Central Bank Digital Currencies – Assessing the Transborder Effects of Digital Yuan Artificial Intelligence in the Internet of Health Things: Is the Solution to AI Privacy More AI? Comments on GDPR Enforcement EDPB Decision 01/020 Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Driven Markets Big Boss is Watching You! The Right to Privacy of Employees in the Context of Workplace Surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1