瑞典的丹伯里制帽商:对遭受工会不公平劳动行为的雇主的可用补救和制裁的美国视角

César F. Rosado Marzán, M. Nikitas
{"title":"瑞典的丹伯里制帽商:对遭受工会不公平劳动行为的雇主的可用补救和制裁的美国视角","authors":"César F. Rosado Marzán, M. Nikitas","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2409058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the remedies available to employers who suffer unfair labor practices by labor unions, and contributes to European Union (EU) discussions on how the EU should sanction labor organizations that infringe on fundamental freedoms. These EU discussions have flourished ever since the Court of Justice of the European Union decided the Laval quartet of cases which held that worker concerted activities that impacted freedom of services and establishment in the EU violated EU law. After Laval, the Swedish Labor Court imposed exemplary or punitive damages, on labor unions for violating EU law. The U.S. experience warns against the imposition of punitive damages. Punitive damages may not only be unfair for workers, but may cause unions to become too risk-averse when representing workers. Moreover, workers' concerted activities should be understood as activities commensurate with market freedoms. If such market freedoms are exercised in unfair ways, the unions should be subject to compensatory but not punitive damages.","PeriodicalId":357008,"journal":{"name":"Employment Law eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Danbury Hatters in Sweden: A U.S. Perspective on the Available Remedies and Sanctions for Employers Who Suffer Unfair Labor Practices by Labor Unions\",\"authors\":\"César F. Rosado Marzán, M. Nikitas\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2409058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes the remedies available to employers who suffer unfair labor practices by labor unions, and contributes to European Union (EU) discussions on how the EU should sanction labor organizations that infringe on fundamental freedoms. These EU discussions have flourished ever since the Court of Justice of the European Union decided the Laval quartet of cases which held that worker concerted activities that impacted freedom of services and establishment in the EU violated EU law. After Laval, the Swedish Labor Court imposed exemplary or punitive damages, on labor unions for violating EU law. The U.S. experience warns against the imposition of punitive damages. Punitive damages may not only be unfair for workers, but may cause unions to become too risk-averse when representing workers. Moreover, workers' concerted activities should be understood as activities commensurate with market freedoms. If such market freedoms are exercised in unfair ways, the unions should be subject to compensatory but not punitive damages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2409058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2409058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了遭受工会不公平劳动行为的雇主可获得的补救措施,并有助于欧盟(EU)讨论欧盟应如何制裁侵犯基本自由的劳工组织。自从欧盟法院裁定拉瓦尔四案以来,这些欧盟讨论就一直在蓬勃发展。拉瓦尔四案认为,工人协调一致的活动影响了欧盟的服务和企业自由,违反了欧盟法律。在拉瓦尔案之后,瑞典劳动法院对违反欧盟法律的工会处以惩戒性或惩罚性赔偿。美国的经验告诫人们不要强加惩罚性赔偿。惩罚性赔偿不仅对工人不公平,而且可能导致工会在代表工人时过于规避风险。此外,工人的协同活动应被理解为与市场自由相称的活动。如果这种市场自由以不公平的方式行使,工会应该得到补偿性赔偿,而不是惩罚性赔偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Danbury Hatters in Sweden: A U.S. Perspective on the Available Remedies and Sanctions for Employers Who Suffer Unfair Labor Practices by Labor Unions
This article describes the remedies available to employers who suffer unfair labor practices by labor unions, and contributes to European Union (EU) discussions on how the EU should sanction labor organizations that infringe on fundamental freedoms. These EU discussions have flourished ever since the Court of Justice of the European Union decided the Laval quartet of cases which held that worker concerted activities that impacted freedom of services and establishment in the EU violated EU law. After Laval, the Swedish Labor Court imposed exemplary or punitive damages, on labor unions for violating EU law. The U.S. experience warns against the imposition of punitive damages. Punitive damages may not only be unfair for workers, but may cause unions to become too risk-averse when representing workers. Moreover, workers' concerted activities should be understood as activities commensurate with market freedoms. If such market freedoms are exercised in unfair ways, the unions should be subject to compensatory but not punitive damages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work from/for Home: Recommendations to Ease Post-Pandemic Multiple Burden on Women Teleworking in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Enabling Conditions for a Successful Transition A Summary of the Statistical Aspects of the Procedures for Resolving Potential Employment Discrimination Recently Issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Along with a Commentary Creative Labour in the Era of Covid-19: The Case of Freelancers Non-Competes and Other Contracts of Dispossession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1