S. Blinder, M. Camborde, K. Buckley, A. Rahmim, K. Cheng, T. Ruth, V. Sossi
{"title":"交互深度对HRRT空间分辨率和图像质量的影响","authors":"S. Blinder, M. Camborde, K. Buckley, A. Rahmim, K. Cheng, T. Ruth, V. Sossi","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high resolution research tomograph (HRRT) is an octagonal design PET camera with 119,808 crystals arranged in a dual layer to determine the depth of interaction (DOI) and compensate for the parallax effect. The DOI discrimination is based on the identification of the layer in which the gamma interaction occurred using pulse shape discrimination. However the observed fractional crystal efficiency is count rate dependent, thus affecting the accuracy of the pulse shape discrimination. In this study we investigated the impact of the mismatch between the emission and the normalization scan count rate on image uniformity using phantom data when DOI correction was applied and when it was switched off. Count rate mismatch was found to manifest itself in form of streaking artifacts and high frequency non-uniformities with a star shape pattern in Fourier space. It was found to be enhanced when DOI correction was applied. In realistic scanning conditions assessed with non-human primate data the effect of count rate mismatch was found to be nearly negligible with DOI correction present or absent. Since DOI corrected data proved to be more sensitive to an emission/normalization count rate mismatch, the impact of DOI on resolution and biological measure obtained in realistic scanning conditions was further evaluated. With DOI determination, spatial resolution was improved by up to 7% in the outer part of the FoV where it was measured to be 2.9 /spl plusmn/ 0.2 mm (SPAN 3) and 3.3 /spl plusmn/ 0.2 mm (SPAN 9) and the biological parameters (binding potentials) extracted from the non-human primate study were improved by up to 5%. In summary this study shows a greater sensitivity to emission/normalization count rate mismatch in phantom studies when DOI correction is present. However much less sensitivity is observed in realistic data, while the resolution uniformity advantage due to DOI determination is still noticeable, not only in resolution measurement but also in the accuracy of the biological measures extracted from realistic scanning protocols.","PeriodicalId":105619,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of depth of interaction on spatial resolution and image quality for the HRRT\",\"authors\":\"S. Blinder, M. Camborde, K. Buckley, A. Rahmim, K. Cheng, T. Ruth, V. Sossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The high resolution research tomograph (HRRT) is an octagonal design PET camera with 119,808 crystals arranged in a dual layer to determine the depth of interaction (DOI) and compensate for the parallax effect. The DOI discrimination is based on the identification of the layer in which the gamma interaction occurred using pulse shape discrimination. However the observed fractional crystal efficiency is count rate dependent, thus affecting the accuracy of the pulse shape discrimination. In this study we investigated the impact of the mismatch between the emission and the normalization scan count rate on image uniformity using phantom data when DOI correction was applied and when it was switched off. Count rate mismatch was found to manifest itself in form of streaking artifacts and high frequency non-uniformities with a star shape pattern in Fourier space. It was found to be enhanced when DOI correction was applied. In realistic scanning conditions assessed with non-human primate data the effect of count rate mismatch was found to be nearly negligible with DOI correction present or absent. Since DOI corrected data proved to be more sensitive to an emission/normalization count rate mismatch, the impact of DOI on resolution and biological measure obtained in realistic scanning conditions was further evaluated. With DOI determination, spatial resolution was improved by up to 7% in the outer part of the FoV where it was measured to be 2.9 /spl plusmn/ 0.2 mm (SPAN 3) and 3.3 /spl plusmn/ 0.2 mm (SPAN 9) and the biological parameters (binding potentials) extracted from the non-human primate study were improved by up to 5%. In summary this study shows a greater sensitivity to emission/normalization count rate mismatch in phantom studies when DOI correction is present. However much less sensitivity is observed in realistic data, while the resolution uniformity advantage due to DOI determination is still noticeable, not only in resolution measurement but also in the accuracy of the biological measures extracted from realistic scanning protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
高分辨率研究层析成像仪(HRRT)是一种八角形设计的PET相机,由119,808个晶体排列在双层中,以确定相互作用深度(DOI)并补偿视差效应。DOI识别是基于使用脉冲形状识别伽马相互作用发生的层的识别。然而,观察到的分数晶体效率依赖于计数率,从而影响了脉冲形状识别的准确性。在本研究中,我们研究了在应用DOI校正和关闭DOI校正时,使用幻影数据研究了发射和归一化扫描计数率之间的不匹配对图像均匀性的影响。发现计数率不匹配表现为条纹伪影和高频不均匀,在傅里叶空间中呈星形图案。应用DOI校正后,发现其增强。在非人类灵长类动物数据评估的现实扫描条件下,计数率不匹配的影响被发现几乎可以忽略不计,DOI校正存在或不存在。由于DOI校正后的数据对发射/归一化计数率失配更为敏感,因此我们进一步评估了DOI对实际扫描条件下获得的分辨率和生物测量的影响。通过DOI确定,FoV外部部分的空间分辨率提高了7%,测量结果为2.9 /spl plusmn/ 0.2 mm (SPAN 3)和3.3 /spl plusmn/ 0.2 mm (SPAN 9),从非人灵长类动物研究中提取的生物学参数(结合电位)提高了5%。总之,本研究表明,当DOI校正存在时,幻影研究对发射/归一化计数率不匹配的敏感性更高。然而,在实际数据中观察到的灵敏度要低得多,而DOI确定所带来的分辨率均匀性优势仍然是显而易见的,不仅在分辨率测量方面,而且在从实际扫描方案中提取的生物测量的准确性方面。
Influence of depth of interaction on spatial resolution and image quality for the HRRT
The high resolution research tomograph (HRRT) is an octagonal design PET camera with 119,808 crystals arranged in a dual layer to determine the depth of interaction (DOI) and compensate for the parallax effect. The DOI discrimination is based on the identification of the layer in which the gamma interaction occurred using pulse shape discrimination. However the observed fractional crystal efficiency is count rate dependent, thus affecting the accuracy of the pulse shape discrimination. In this study we investigated the impact of the mismatch between the emission and the normalization scan count rate on image uniformity using phantom data when DOI correction was applied and when it was switched off. Count rate mismatch was found to manifest itself in form of streaking artifacts and high frequency non-uniformities with a star shape pattern in Fourier space. It was found to be enhanced when DOI correction was applied. In realistic scanning conditions assessed with non-human primate data the effect of count rate mismatch was found to be nearly negligible with DOI correction present or absent. Since DOI corrected data proved to be more sensitive to an emission/normalization count rate mismatch, the impact of DOI on resolution and biological measure obtained in realistic scanning conditions was further evaluated. With DOI determination, spatial resolution was improved by up to 7% in the outer part of the FoV where it was measured to be 2.9 /spl plusmn/ 0.2 mm (SPAN 3) and 3.3 /spl plusmn/ 0.2 mm (SPAN 9) and the biological parameters (binding potentials) extracted from the non-human primate study were improved by up to 5%. In summary this study shows a greater sensitivity to emission/normalization count rate mismatch in phantom studies when DOI correction is present. However much less sensitivity is observed in realistic data, while the resolution uniformity advantage due to DOI determination is still noticeable, not only in resolution measurement but also in the accuracy of the biological measures extracted from realistic scanning protocols.