J. Gual, M. Hellwig, A. Perrot, Michele Polo, P. Rey, Klaus M. Schmidt, Rune Stenbacka
{"title":"对第82条的经济处理","authors":"J. Gual, M. Hellwig, A. Perrot, Michele Polo, P. Rey, Klaus M. Schmidt, Rune Stenbacka","doi":"10.5282/UBM/EPUB.745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report argues in favour of an economics-based approach to Article 82, in a way similar to the reform of Article 81 and merger control. In particular, we support an effects-based rather than a form-based approach to competition policy. Such an approach focuses on the presence of anti-competitive effects that harm consumers, and is based on the examination of each specific case, based on sound economics and grounded on facts.","PeriodicalId":383649,"journal":{"name":"Competition Policy International","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"111","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Economic Approach to Article 82\",\"authors\":\"J. Gual, M. Hellwig, A. Perrot, Michele Polo, P. Rey, Klaus M. Schmidt, Rune Stenbacka\",\"doi\":\"10.5282/UBM/EPUB.745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This report argues in favour of an economics-based approach to Article 82, in a way similar to the reform of Article 81 and merger control. In particular, we support an effects-based rather than a form-based approach to competition policy. Such an approach focuses on the presence of anti-competitive effects that harm consumers, and is based on the examination of each specific case, based on sound economics and grounded on facts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition Policy International\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"111\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition Policy International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5282/UBM/EPUB.745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Policy International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5282/UBM/EPUB.745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This report argues in favour of an economics-based approach to Article 82, in a way similar to the reform of Article 81 and merger control. In particular, we support an effects-based rather than a form-based approach to competition policy. Such an approach focuses on the presence of anti-competitive effects that harm consumers, and is based on the examination of each specific case, based on sound economics and grounded on facts.