消防任务分配优化

Frank-Gerrit Poggenpohl, Dennis Güttinger
{"title":"消防任务分配优化","authors":"Frank-Gerrit Poggenpohl, Dennis Güttinger","doi":"10.1109/iNCoS.2012.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work we consider the problem of allocating tasks to fire brigade roles when facing major incidents like conflagrations or natural disasters. Due to missing experience with major incidents, a balanced workload of the different roles cannot be guaranteed, as task allocation is usually done manually by operations managers based on their empirical knowledge. Concerning this, we will introduce a new concept of role specific penalty functions that assign a stress level to every role depending on its working time. As the resulting problem is NP-complete, we will use an optimization strategy that combines a greedy approach with a modified version of the simulated annealing algorithm to approximatively solve this optimization problem. In our experimental study we will see that the assignment of tasks to roles computed by this algorithm on an empirical data set leads to a smaller total processing time and to a more balanced workload of roles compared to action plan recommendations given by six operations managers from the fire brigade.","PeriodicalId":287478,"journal":{"name":"2012 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Task Allocation on Fire Fighting\",\"authors\":\"Frank-Gerrit Poggenpohl, Dennis Güttinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iNCoS.2012.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work we consider the problem of allocating tasks to fire brigade roles when facing major incidents like conflagrations or natural disasters. Due to missing experience with major incidents, a balanced workload of the different roles cannot be guaranteed, as task allocation is usually done manually by operations managers based on their empirical knowledge. Concerning this, we will introduce a new concept of role specific penalty functions that assign a stress level to every role depending on its working time. As the resulting problem is NP-complete, we will use an optimization strategy that combines a greedy approach with a modified version of the simulated annealing algorithm to approximatively solve this optimization problem. In our experimental study we will see that the assignment of tasks to roles computed by this algorithm on an empirical data set leads to a smaller total processing time and to a more balanced workload of roles compared to action plan recommendations given by six operations managers from the fire brigade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iNCoS.2012.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iNCoS.2012.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在这项工作中,我们考虑了在面对火灾或自然灾害等重大事件时分配任务给消防队角色的问题。由于缺乏处理重大事件的经验,无法保证不同角色的工作量平衡,因为任务分配通常是由运营经理根据经验知识手动完成的。对此,我们将引入角色特定惩罚函数的新概念,根据每个角色的工作时间为其分配压力水平。由于所得到的问题是np完全的,我们将使用一种优化策略,将贪婪方法与改进版的模拟退火算法结合起来,近似地解决这个优化问题。在我们的实验研究中,我们将看到,与来自消防队的六名操作经理给出的行动计划建议相比,通过该算法在经验数据集上计算角色的任务分配导致了更短的总处理时间和更平衡的角色工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Task Allocation on Fire Fighting
In this work we consider the problem of allocating tasks to fire brigade roles when facing major incidents like conflagrations or natural disasters. Due to missing experience with major incidents, a balanced workload of the different roles cannot be guaranteed, as task allocation is usually done manually by operations managers based on their empirical knowledge. Concerning this, we will introduce a new concept of role specific penalty functions that assign a stress level to every role depending on its working time. As the resulting problem is NP-complete, we will use an optimization strategy that combines a greedy approach with a modified version of the simulated annealing algorithm to approximatively solve this optimization problem. In our experimental study we will see that the assignment of tasks to roles computed by this algorithm on an empirical data set leads to a smaller total processing time and to a more balanced workload of roles compared to action plan recommendations given by six operations managers from the fire brigade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Evaluation of Private Information Retrieval Techniques in Location-Based Services SOSCast: Location Estimation of Immobilized Persons through SOS Message Propagation Unsupervised Human Action Categorization Using Latent Dirichlet Markov Clustering A P2P Traffic Localization Method with Additional Delay Insertion Evaluation for Acquiring Method for Agents' Actions with Ant Colony Optimization in Robo Cup Rescue Simulation System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1