{"title":"喷妥沙昏迷治疗与定向体温管理治疗外伤性脑损伤并发症的比较","authors":"K. Lee, J. Kim, D. Park","doi":"10.32587/jnic.2022.00549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPentothal coma therapy (PCT) and targeted temperature management (TTM) are considered the most aggressive medical care for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there is very little comparison between these two options. We compared the survival rates and complications between the two treatments.MethodsNineteen patients who received treatment for PCT or TTM after severe TBI between March 2018 and April 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Medical records were reviewed, including general information, neurologic status, treatment courses, survival rate, and complications. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment modalities (PCT vs. TTM), and comparison analyses were conducted.ResultsThe survival rate in the TTM group was 33.3% (3/9), which was higher than that in the PCT group (1/10, 10%). However, this difference was not significant (p = 0.213). In terms of complications, there were no statistically significant differences in hemodynamic instability, cardiovascular disability, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, coagulopathy, or hyperglycemia. Commonly observed complications included hypokalemia in the TTM group (100% in the TTM group vs 70% in the PCT group; p = 0.073) and hyperkalemia in the PCT group (50% in the PCT group vs 11.1% in the TTM group; p = 0.069).ConclusionSevere TBI patients treated with TTM has non-significantly lower mortality than them with PCT (66.7% vs. 90%); however, complications of hypokalemia can be frequently observed (100%). Further study was necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTM.","PeriodicalId":356321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurointensive Care","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Complications of Pentothal Coma Therapy and Targeted Temperature Management in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients\",\"authors\":\"K. Lee, J. Kim, D. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.32587/jnic.2022.00549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundPentothal coma therapy (PCT) and targeted temperature management (TTM) are considered the most aggressive medical care for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there is very little comparison between these two options. We compared the survival rates and complications between the two treatments.MethodsNineteen patients who received treatment for PCT or TTM after severe TBI between March 2018 and April 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Medical records were reviewed, including general information, neurologic status, treatment courses, survival rate, and complications. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment modalities (PCT vs. TTM), and comparison analyses were conducted.ResultsThe survival rate in the TTM group was 33.3% (3/9), which was higher than that in the PCT group (1/10, 10%). However, this difference was not significant (p = 0.213). In terms of complications, there were no statistically significant differences in hemodynamic instability, cardiovascular disability, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, coagulopathy, or hyperglycemia. Commonly observed complications included hypokalemia in the TTM group (100% in the TTM group vs 70% in the PCT group; p = 0.073) and hyperkalemia in the PCT group (50% in the PCT group vs 11.1% in the TTM group; p = 0.069).ConclusionSevere TBI patients treated with TTM has non-significantly lower mortality than them with PCT (66.7% vs. 90%); however, complications of hypokalemia can be frequently observed (100%). Further study was necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurointensive Care\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurointensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32587/jnic.2022.00549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurointensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32587/jnic.2022.00549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景喷妥昏迷治疗(PCT)和靶向温度管理(TTM)被认为是对严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者最积极的医疗护理。然而,这两种选择之间几乎没有可比性。我们比较了两种治疗方法的生存率和并发症。方法回顾性纳入2018年3月至2022年4月期间接受PCT或TTM治疗的19例重度TBI患者。回顾医疗记录,包括一般信息、神经系统状况、疗程、存活率和并发症。根据治疗方式将患者分为两组(PCT vs. TTM),进行比较分析。结果TTM组患者生存率为33.3%(3/9),高于PCT组(1/ 10,10 %)。然而,这种差异不显著(p = 0.213)。在并发症方面,两组在血流动力学不稳定、心血管功能障碍、肝功能障碍、肾功能障碍、肺炎、尿路感染、高钾血症、低钾血症、凝血功能障碍、高血糖等方面差异无统计学意义。常见的并发症包括TTM组低钾血症(TTM组为100%,PCT组为70%;p = 0.073)和高钾血症(PCT组50% vs TTM组11.1%;P = 0.069)。结论TTM治疗重型TBI患者的死亡率低于PCT治疗(66.7% vs. 90%);然而,低钾血症的并发症可以经常观察到(100%)。还需要进一步的研究来评价中药的疗效和安全性。
Comparison Between Complications of Pentothal Coma Therapy and Targeted Temperature Management in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients
BackgroundPentothal coma therapy (PCT) and targeted temperature management (TTM) are considered the most aggressive medical care for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there is very little comparison between these two options. We compared the survival rates and complications between the two treatments.MethodsNineteen patients who received treatment for PCT or TTM after severe TBI between March 2018 and April 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Medical records were reviewed, including general information, neurologic status, treatment courses, survival rate, and complications. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment modalities (PCT vs. TTM), and comparison analyses were conducted.ResultsThe survival rate in the TTM group was 33.3% (3/9), which was higher than that in the PCT group (1/10, 10%). However, this difference was not significant (p = 0.213). In terms of complications, there were no statistically significant differences in hemodynamic instability, cardiovascular disability, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, coagulopathy, or hyperglycemia. Commonly observed complications included hypokalemia in the TTM group (100% in the TTM group vs 70% in the PCT group; p = 0.073) and hyperkalemia in the PCT group (50% in the PCT group vs 11.1% in the TTM group; p = 0.069).ConclusionSevere TBI patients treated with TTM has non-significantly lower mortality than them with PCT (66.7% vs. 90%); however, complications of hypokalemia can be frequently observed (100%). Further study was necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTM.