机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术,在中央军事医院工作一年,报告前55例

S.A. Gil-Villa , J.G. Campos-Salcedo , M.A. Zapata-Villalba , J.C. López-Silvestre , C.E. Estrada-Carrasco , L.A. Mendoza-Álvarez , C. Díaz-Gómez , J.L. Reyes-Equihua , H. Rosas-Hernández , J.J. Torres-Gómez , E.I. Bravo-Castro , J.A. Castelán-Martínez , E. Zonana-Farca , J.J. Torres-Salazar , A. Sedano-Lozano , J.G. Calderón-García , T.F. Gil-Villa , N. Arribeño-Fonseca , J. Aguilar-Colmenero , J.J. Islas-García , A. Ruiz-Hernández
{"title":"机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术,在中央军事医院工作一年,报告前55例","authors":"S.A. Gil-Villa ,&nbsp;J.G. Campos-Salcedo ,&nbsp;M.A. Zapata-Villalba ,&nbsp;J.C. López-Silvestre ,&nbsp;C.E. Estrada-Carrasco ,&nbsp;L.A. Mendoza-Álvarez ,&nbsp;C. Díaz-Gómez ,&nbsp;J.L. Reyes-Equihua ,&nbsp;H. Rosas-Hernández ,&nbsp;J.J. Torres-Gómez ,&nbsp;E.I. Bravo-Castro ,&nbsp;J.A. Castelán-Martínez ,&nbsp;E. Zonana-Farca ,&nbsp;J.J. Torres-Salazar ,&nbsp;A. Sedano-Lozano ,&nbsp;J.G. Calderón-García ,&nbsp;T.F. Gil-Villa ,&nbsp;N. Arribeño-Fonseca ,&nbsp;J. Aguilar-Colmenero ,&nbsp;J.J. Islas-García ,&nbsp;A. Ruiz-Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.uromx.2016.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To present the first year experience of the robotic surgery project at the <em>Hospital Central Militar</em> that consisted of 55 consecutive cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>With the incorporation of the robotic surgery system in November 2014 to November 2015, the same surgeon (JGCS) performed a total of 55 radical prostatectomies. In the present retrospective study, the following preoperative data were analyzed: ECOG, ASA risk, BMI, associated morbidities, previous radiotherapy, history of TURP, IPSS, erectile function, urinary continence index, PSA, prostatic volume, Gleason score, initial staging, and clinical stage. The intraoperative variables were: type of access, surgery duration, conversion rate, bleeding, blood transfusions, complications, type of anastomosis, and time with bladder catheter. The postoperative variables analyzed were: positive margins, biochemical recurrence, urinary continence, and erectile function.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the patients was 68 years and the mean PSA value was 7.80<!--> <!-->ng/ml. In 50.9% of the cases, the Gleason score was 6 (3<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->3). Mean surgery duration was 270<!--> <!-->min and mean estimated blood loss was 512<!--> <!-->ml. Mean hospital stay and time with catheter was 5.9 and 8 days, respectively, and the positive margin rate was 18.1%. The rates for continence and potency at the follow-up at one, 3, 6, and 12 months were 41.8%, 78%, 88%, 100% and 29%, 41%, 68%, 66%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of our initial experience with robotic radical prostatectomy are promising. We have been able to put robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy into practice at our hospital in a safe and reproducible manner with a minimum of adverse results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34909,"journal":{"name":"Revista mexicana de urologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.uromx.2016.01.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prostatectomía radical laparoscópica asistida por robot, un año de experiencia en el Hospital Central Militar, reporte de los primeros 55 casos\",\"authors\":\"S.A. Gil-Villa ,&nbsp;J.G. Campos-Salcedo ,&nbsp;M.A. Zapata-Villalba ,&nbsp;J.C. López-Silvestre ,&nbsp;C.E. Estrada-Carrasco ,&nbsp;L.A. Mendoza-Álvarez ,&nbsp;C. Díaz-Gómez ,&nbsp;J.L. Reyes-Equihua ,&nbsp;H. Rosas-Hernández ,&nbsp;J.J. Torres-Gómez ,&nbsp;E.I. Bravo-Castro ,&nbsp;J.A. Castelán-Martínez ,&nbsp;E. Zonana-Farca ,&nbsp;J.J. Torres-Salazar ,&nbsp;A. Sedano-Lozano ,&nbsp;J.G. Calderón-García ,&nbsp;T.F. Gil-Villa ,&nbsp;N. Arribeño-Fonseca ,&nbsp;J. Aguilar-Colmenero ,&nbsp;J.J. Islas-García ,&nbsp;A. Ruiz-Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.uromx.2016.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To present the first year experience of the robotic surgery project at the <em>Hospital Central Militar</em> that consisted of 55 consecutive cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>With the incorporation of the robotic surgery system in November 2014 to November 2015, the same surgeon (JGCS) performed a total of 55 radical prostatectomies. In the present retrospective study, the following preoperative data were analyzed: ECOG, ASA risk, BMI, associated morbidities, previous radiotherapy, history of TURP, IPSS, erectile function, urinary continence index, PSA, prostatic volume, Gleason score, initial staging, and clinical stage. The intraoperative variables were: type of access, surgery duration, conversion rate, bleeding, blood transfusions, complications, type of anastomosis, and time with bladder catheter. The postoperative variables analyzed were: positive margins, biochemical recurrence, urinary continence, and erectile function.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the patients was 68 years and the mean PSA value was 7.80<!--> <!-->ng/ml. In 50.9% of the cases, the Gleason score was 6 (3<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->3). Mean surgery duration was 270<!--> <!-->min and mean estimated blood loss was 512<!--> <!-->ml. Mean hospital stay and time with catheter was 5.9 and 8 days, respectively, and the positive margin rate was 18.1%. The rates for continence and potency at the follow-up at one, 3, 6, and 12 months were 41.8%, 78%, 88%, 100% and 29%, 41%, 68%, 66%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of our initial experience with robotic radical prostatectomy are promising. We have been able to put robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy into practice at our hospital in a safe and reproducible manner with a minimum of adverse results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista mexicana de urologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.uromx.2016.01.002\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista mexicana de urologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007408516000136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista mexicana de urologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007408516000136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的介绍中央军事医院机器人手术项目第一年的经验,该项目包括55例连续的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。方法2014年11月至2015年11月,同一外科医生(JGCS)共行根治性前列腺切除术55例。在本回顾性研究中,我们分析了以下术前数据:ECOG、ASA风险、BMI、相关发病率、既往放疗、TURP史、IPSS、勃起功能、尿失禁指数、PSA、前列腺体积、Gleason评分、初始分期、临床分期。术中变量为:通路类型、手术时间、转换率、出血量、输血量、并发症、吻合方式、膀胱导尿管时间。术后变量分析为:阳性边缘、生化复发、尿失禁和勃起功能。结果患者平均年龄68岁,PSA平均值为7.80 ng/ml。50.9%的病例Gleason评分为6(3 + 3),平均手术时间为270 min,平均估计失血量为512 ml,平均住院时间为5.9天,平均置管时间为8天,阳性切率为18.1%。1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月的尿失禁率和效力率分别为41.8%、78%、88%、100%和29%、41%、68%、66%。结论机器人根治性前列腺切除术的初步结果是有希望的。我们已经能够将机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术在我们医院以一种安全、可重复的方式付诸实践,并且不良后果最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prostatectomía radical laparoscópica asistida por robot, un año de experiencia en el Hospital Central Militar, reporte de los primeros 55 casos

Aim

To present the first year experience of the robotic surgery project at the Hospital Central Militar that consisted of 55 consecutive cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Methods

With the incorporation of the robotic surgery system in November 2014 to November 2015, the same surgeon (JGCS) performed a total of 55 radical prostatectomies. In the present retrospective study, the following preoperative data were analyzed: ECOG, ASA risk, BMI, associated morbidities, previous radiotherapy, history of TURP, IPSS, erectile function, urinary continence index, PSA, prostatic volume, Gleason score, initial staging, and clinical stage. The intraoperative variables were: type of access, surgery duration, conversion rate, bleeding, blood transfusions, complications, type of anastomosis, and time with bladder catheter. The postoperative variables analyzed were: positive margins, biochemical recurrence, urinary continence, and erectile function.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 68 years and the mean PSA value was 7.80 ng/ml. In 50.9% of the cases, the Gleason score was 6 (3 + 3). Mean surgery duration was 270 min and mean estimated blood loss was 512 ml. Mean hospital stay and time with catheter was 5.9 and 8 days, respectively, and the positive margin rate was 18.1%. The rates for continence and potency at the follow-up at one, 3, 6, and 12 months were 41.8%, 78%, 88%, 100% and 29%, 41%, 68%, 66%, respectively.

Conclusions

The results of our initial experience with robotic radical prostatectomy are promising. We have been able to put robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy into practice at our hospital in a safe and reproducible manner with a minimum of adverse results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista mexicana de urologia
Revista mexicana de urologia Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Revista Mexicana de Urología (RMU) [Mexican Journal of Urology] (ISSN: 0185-4542 / ISSN electronic: 2007-4085) is bimonthly publication that disseminates research by academicians and professionals of the international medical community interested in urological subjects, in the format of original articles, clinical cases, review articles brief communications and letters to the editor. Owing to its nature, it is publication with international scope that disseminates contributions in Spanish and English that are rigorously reviewed by peers under the double blind modality. Neither journalistic documents nor those that lack rigorous medical or scientific support are suitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Fe de errores de «Resultados obtenidos con nefrolitotomía percutánea y su correlación con las escalas de Guy y S.T.O.N.E. en un hospital de la Ciudad de México» [Rev Mex Urol. 2016;76:331] Blindness due to a systemic fungal infection in a patient with a ureteral catheter Permixon® en el tratamiento de los síntomas del tracto urinario inferior por hiperplasia benigna de próstata: Nuevas aportaciones Resultados de la nefrectomía laparoscópica en pacientes obesos y no obesos Alfa-1 bloqueantes y resultados urodinámicos en varones con síntomas del tracto urinario inferior relacionados con obstrucción benigna de próstata: ¿fin de la controversia?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1