谁能不能想想考试?持续实践中应对行业挑战的扎根理论方法

Daniel Ståhl, Torvald Mårtensson
{"title":"谁能不能想想考试?持续实践中应对行业挑战的扎根理论方法","authors":"Daniel Ståhl, Torvald Mårtensson","doi":"10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continuous integration and delivery are well-established paradigms in the software development community. With these continuous practices come many challenges; while some of these challenges are immediate and well documented in literature, others may be revealed only after sustained application of these practices in large-scale and complex contexts. Based on researcher observations and interviews with 22 senior professionals from four companies, all with significant but varied experiences of continuous practices, we present a set of underreported challenges with continuous practices observed in multiple industry settings. Through a grounded theory approach we construct the Tapco model — Test Automation Progression in Continuous Practices — identifying two distinct ways in which companies progress towards continuous delivery, onto which the studied cases are mapped. This model is then validated by presenting it to the four studied companies, operating in disparate industry segments, and to three additional industry cases, letting them evaluate its relevancy, accuracy and novelty. We find that the model provides industry professionals with essential guidance on how to avoid common pitfalls, as well as an understanding of their causes and possible remediation.","PeriodicalId":435977,"journal":{"name":"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"298 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Tests? A Grounded Theory Approach to Industry Challenges in Continuous Practices\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Ståhl, Torvald Mårtensson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Continuous integration and delivery are well-established paradigms in the software development community. With these continuous practices come many challenges; while some of these challenges are immediate and well documented in literature, others may be revealed only after sustained application of these practices in large-scale and complex contexts. Based on researcher observations and interviews with 22 senior professionals from four companies, all with significant but varied experiences of continuous practices, we present a set of underreported challenges with continuous practices observed in multiple industry settings. Through a grounded theory approach we construct the Tapco model — Test Automation Progression in Continuous Practices — identifying two distinct ways in which companies progress towards continuous delivery, onto which the studied cases are mapped. This model is then validated by presenting it to the four studied companies, operating in disparate industry segments, and to three additional industry cases, letting them evaluate its relevancy, accuracy and novelty. We find that the model provides industry professionals with essential guidance on how to avoid common pitfalls, as well as an understanding of their causes and possible remediation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"volume\":\"298 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在软件开发社区中,持续集成和交付是公认的范例。这些持续的实践带来了许多挑战;虽然其中一些挑战是直接的,并在文献中有很好的记录,但其他挑战可能只有在大规模和复杂的环境中持续应用这些实践后才能揭示。根据研究人员的观察和对来自四家公司的22名高级专业人士的采访,他们都有重要但不同的连续实践经验,我们提出了一系列在多个行业环境中观察到的连续实践中未被报道的挑战。通过基于理论的方法,我们构建了Tapco模型——持续实践中的测试自动化进展——确定了公司向持续交付发展的两种不同方式,并将所研究的案例映射到持续交付上。然后,通过将该模型展示给四家被研究的公司,在不同的行业部门运营,以及另外三个行业案例,让他们评估其相关性,准确性和新颖性,从而验证该模型。我们发现该模型为行业专业人员提供了关于如何避免常见陷阱的基本指导,以及对其原因和可能的补救措施的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Tests? A Grounded Theory Approach to Industry Challenges in Continuous Practices
Continuous integration and delivery are well-established paradigms in the software development community. With these continuous practices come many challenges; while some of these challenges are immediate and well documented in literature, others may be revealed only after sustained application of these practices in large-scale and complex contexts. Based on researcher observations and interviews with 22 senior professionals from four companies, all with significant but varied experiences of continuous practices, we present a set of underreported challenges with continuous practices observed in multiple industry settings. Through a grounded theory approach we construct the Tapco model — Test Automation Progression in Continuous Practices — identifying two distinct ways in which companies progress towards continuous delivery, onto which the studied cases are mapped. This model is then validated by presenting it to the four studied companies, operating in disparate industry segments, and to three additional industry cases, letting them evaluate its relevancy, accuracy and novelty. We find that the model provides industry professionals with essential guidance on how to avoid common pitfalls, as well as an understanding of their causes and possible remediation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Study as Foundation for a Variability Modeling Body of Knowledge Technical Debt Impacting Lead-Times: An Exploratory Study Combining CNN with DS3 for Detecting Bug-prone Modules in Cross-version Projects Towards MLOps: A Framework and Maturity Model An Approach for Ranking Feature-based Clustering Methods and its Application in Multi-System Infrastructure Monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1