{"title":"发展需求规范的分析-修订周期","authors":"A. Garcez, A. Russo, B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2001.989828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that the evolution of requirements specifications can be supported by a cycle composed of two phases: analysis and revision. We investigate an instance of such a cycle, which combines two techniques of logical abduction and inductive learning to analyze and revise specifications respectively.","PeriodicalId":433615,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis-revision cycle to evolve requirements specifications\",\"authors\":\"A. Garcez, A. Russo, B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASE.2001.989828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We argue that the evolution of requirements specifications can be supported by a cycle composed of two phases: analysis and revision. We investigate an instance of such a cycle, which combines two techniques of logical abduction and inductive learning to analyze and revise specifications respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2001.989828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2001.989828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An analysis-revision cycle to evolve requirements specifications
We argue that the evolution of requirements specifications can be supported by a cycle composed of two phases: analysis and revision. We investigate an instance of such a cycle, which combines two techniques of logical abduction and inductive learning to analyze and revise specifications respectively.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
