经纪创业融资

Emmanuel Yimfor
{"title":"经纪创业融资","authors":"Emmanuel Yimfor","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3511164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I study broker intermediation in entrepreneurial financing. Brokers intermediate 15% of startup offerings, but 20% of these brokers are unregistered \"finders.\" Issuers using finders are 30% and 20% less likely to have successful post-funding outcomes than issuers in registered-broker and direct offerings. These outcome gaps are larger when state-level regulatory oversight, which only applies to registered brokers, is stronger and when finders are expelled brokers. These findings are consistent with adverse selection in finder-intermediated offerings. I also show that finder-intermediated offerings more often place with retail (non-accredited) investors and rarely involve VC participation, also amplifying the gap in post-funding performance.","PeriodicalId":236717,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brokered Startup Financing\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Yimfor\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3511164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I study broker intermediation in entrepreneurial financing. Brokers intermediate 15% of startup offerings, but 20% of these brokers are unregistered \\\"finders.\\\" Issuers using finders are 30% and 20% less likely to have successful post-funding outcomes than issuers in registered-broker and direct offerings. These outcome gaps are larger when state-level regulatory oversight, which only applies to registered brokers, is stronger and when finders are expelled brokers. These findings are consistent with adverse selection in finder-intermediated offerings. I also show that finder-intermediated offerings more often place with retail (non-accredited) investors and rarely involve VC participation, also amplifying the gap in post-funding performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3511164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3511164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我研究创业融资中的经纪人中介。经纪人为15%的创业公司提供中介服务,但其中20%是未注册的“发现者”。与注册经纪人和直接发行的发行人相比,使用寻找者的发行人在融资后获得成功的可能性要低30%和20%。当只适用于注册经纪商的州级监管力度加大,以及发现违规经纪商被驱逐时,这些结果差距就会更大。这些发现与逆向选择在发现者中介产品一致。我还指出,以发现者为中介的产品往往是由散户(非认证)投资者提供的,很少有风投参与,这也扩大了融资后业绩的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brokered Startup Financing
I study broker intermediation in entrepreneurial financing. Brokers intermediate 15% of startup offerings, but 20% of these brokers are unregistered "finders." Issuers using finders are 30% and 20% less likely to have successful post-funding outcomes than issuers in registered-broker and direct offerings. These outcome gaps are larger when state-level regulatory oversight, which only applies to registered brokers, is stronger and when finders are expelled brokers. These findings are consistent with adverse selection in finder-intermediated offerings. I also show that finder-intermediated offerings more often place with retail (non-accredited) investors and rarely involve VC participation, also amplifying the gap in post-funding performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bank Incentives and the Impact of the Paycheck Protection Program Value Games Insolvency Risk of European SMEs during Pandemic Do Credit Supply Shocks Affect Employment in Middle-Income Countries? Political Connections, Financial Constraints, and Corporate Taxation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1