{"title":"经纪创业融资","authors":"Emmanuel Yimfor","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3511164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I study broker intermediation in entrepreneurial financing. Brokers intermediate 15% of startup offerings, but 20% of these brokers are unregistered \"finders.\" Issuers using finders are 30% and 20% less likely to have successful post-funding outcomes than issuers in registered-broker and direct offerings. These outcome gaps are larger when state-level regulatory oversight, which only applies to registered brokers, is stronger and when finders are expelled brokers. These findings are consistent with adverse selection in finder-intermediated offerings. I also show that finder-intermediated offerings more often place with retail (non-accredited) investors and rarely involve VC participation, also amplifying the gap in post-funding performance.","PeriodicalId":236717,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brokered Startup Financing\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Yimfor\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3511164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I study broker intermediation in entrepreneurial financing. Brokers intermediate 15% of startup offerings, but 20% of these brokers are unregistered \\\"finders.\\\" Issuers using finders are 30% and 20% less likely to have successful post-funding outcomes than issuers in registered-broker and direct offerings. These outcome gaps are larger when state-level regulatory oversight, which only applies to registered brokers, is stronger and when finders are expelled brokers. These findings are consistent with adverse selection in finder-intermediated offerings. I also show that finder-intermediated offerings more often place with retail (non-accredited) investors and rarely involve VC participation, also amplifying the gap in post-funding performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3511164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3511164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
I study broker intermediation in entrepreneurial financing. Brokers intermediate 15% of startup offerings, but 20% of these brokers are unregistered "finders." Issuers using finders are 30% and 20% less likely to have successful post-funding outcomes than issuers in registered-broker and direct offerings. These outcome gaps are larger when state-level regulatory oversight, which only applies to registered brokers, is stronger and when finders are expelled brokers. These findings are consistent with adverse selection in finder-intermediated offerings. I also show that finder-intermediated offerings more often place with retail (non-accredited) investors and rarely involve VC participation, also amplifying the gap in post-funding performance.