隔离100天期间冠状病毒时期的金融:以欧洲股市为例

N. Alber
{"title":"隔离100天期间冠状病毒时期的金融:以欧洲股市为例","authors":"N. Alber","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3631517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to investigate the effects of Coronavirus spread on the European stock markets. Coronavirus spread has been measured by cumulative cases, new cases, cumulative deaths and new deaths, while abnormal return of stock market is measured according to market model. This has been applied on stock markets of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands Spain and UK, on daily basis during the period from Febreuary15, 2020 till May 24, 2020.<br><br>Results have NOT supported these anticipated effects using panel analysis according to GMM technique, for the whole research period. After splitting the research period into 7 sub-periods (2-weeks each), results indicate that abnormal return of stock market seems to be sensitive to Coronavirus cases more than deaths, and to Coronavirus cumulative indicators more than new ones. <br><br>Results provide that stock markets have reacted negatively to Coronavirus spread, where all of the 4 indicators seem to affect abnormal return of stock markets during the first and second period. Results don’t support any negative effects during the third and fourth periods. Starting from the fifth period, stock markets seem to be influenced negatively by “Relative Cumulative Coronavirus Deaths” (RCCD). Besides, country effect has been investigated, where stock markets of Germany, Netherlands and UK have been affected by Coronavirus spread during the second period. For Belgium, France, Italy and Spain, these effects have been supported during the fourth period. <br><br>A robustness check has been conducted using the 4 indicators of Coronavirus spread for each of the 7 periods. This has been applied on the 273 stocks of the 7 countries during the research period (100 days) and supports the effect of Coronavirus spread on abnormal returns of stock markets during the first and second periods. It’s important to pinpoint that this effect has been supported only for “Relative Cumulative Coronavirus Cases” (RCCC). Another robustness check has been conducted using market return instead of abnormal return, and supported this effect. <br><br>","PeriodicalId":233958,"journal":{"name":"European Finance eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finance in the Time of Coronavirus during 100 Days of Isolation: The Case of the European Stock Markets\",\"authors\":\"N. Alber\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3631517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper attempts to investigate the effects of Coronavirus spread on the European stock markets. Coronavirus spread has been measured by cumulative cases, new cases, cumulative deaths and new deaths, while abnormal return of stock market is measured according to market model. This has been applied on stock markets of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands Spain and UK, on daily basis during the period from Febreuary15, 2020 till May 24, 2020.<br><br>Results have NOT supported these anticipated effects using panel analysis according to GMM technique, for the whole research period. After splitting the research period into 7 sub-periods (2-weeks each), results indicate that abnormal return of stock market seems to be sensitive to Coronavirus cases more than deaths, and to Coronavirus cumulative indicators more than new ones. <br><br>Results provide that stock markets have reacted negatively to Coronavirus spread, where all of the 4 indicators seem to affect abnormal return of stock markets during the first and second period. Results don’t support any negative effects during the third and fourth periods. Starting from the fifth period, stock markets seem to be influenced negatively by “Relative Cumulative Coronavirus Deaths” (RCCD). Besides, country effect has been investigated, where stock markets of Germany, Netherlands and UK have been affected by Coronavirus spread during the second period. For Belgium, France, Italy and Spain, these effects have been supported during the fourth period. <br><br>A robustness check has been conducted using the 4 indicators of Coronavirus spread for each of the 7 periods. This has been applied on the 273 stocks of the 7 countries during the research period (100 days) and supports the effect of Coronavirus spread on abnormal returns of stock markets during the first and second periods. It’s important to pinpoint that this effect has been supported only for “Relative Cumulative Coronavirus Cases” (RCCC). Another robustness check has been conducted using market return instead of abnormal return, and supported this effect. <br><br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":233958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文试图研究冠状病毒传播对欧洲股市的影响。用累计病例数、新增病例数、累计死亡人数和新增死亡人数来衡量冠状病毒的传播,用市场模型来衡量股市的异常回报。这已于2020年2月15日至2020年5月24日期间在比利时、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰、西班牙和英国的股票市场每日实施。在整个研究期间,根据GMM技术使用面板分析的结果不支持这些预期的影响。将研究周期分成7个子周期(每个子周期2周),结果表明,股市异常收益对冠状病毒病例的敏感性大于死亡病例,对冠状病毒累积指标的敏感性大于新发指标。结果表明,股市对冠状病毒传播的反应是负面的,在第一和第二阶段,4个指标似乎都影响了股市的异常回报。结果不支持在第三和第四阶段有任何负面影响。从第5个周期开始,股市似乎受到“冠状病毒相对累积死亡人数”(RCCD)的负面影响。此外,还调查了国家效应,德国、荷兰和英国的股票市场在第二阶段受到冠状病毒传播的影响。对于比利时、法国、意大利和西班牙,这些影响在第四个时期得到证实。对这7个时期中的每一个时期使用冠状病毒传播的4个指标进行了稳健性检查。这一结果在研究期间(100天)对7个国家的273只股票进行了分析,证实了新冠肺炎疫情对第一、第二阶段股市异常收益的影响。重要的是要指出,这种效应仅适用于“相对累积冠状病毒病例”(RCCC)。用市场收益代替异常收益进行稳健性检验,支持了这一效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finance in the Time of Coronavirus during 100 Days of Isolation: The Case of the European Stock Markets
This paper attempts to investigate the effects of Coronavirus spread on the European stock markets. Coronavirus spread has been measured by cumulative cases, new cases, cumulative deaths and new deaths, while abnormal return of stock market is measured according to market model. This has been applied on stock markets of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands Spain and UK, on daily basis during the period from Febreuary15, 2020 till May 24, 2020.

Results have NOT supported these anticipated effects using panel analysis according to GMM technique, for the whole research period. After splitting the research period into 7 sub-periods (2-weeks each), results indicate that abnormal return of stock market seems to be sensitive to Coronavirus cases more than deaths, and to Coronavirus cumulative indicators more than new ones.

Results provide that stock markets have reacted negatively to Coronavirus spread, where all of the 4 indicators seem to affect abnormal return of stock markets during the first and second period. Results don’t support any negative effects during the third and fourth periods. Starting from the fifth period, stock markets seem to be influenced negatively by “Relative Cumulative Coronavirus Deaths” (RCCD). Besides, country effect has been investigated, where stock markets of Germany, Netherlands and UK have been affected by Coronavirus spread during the second period. For Belgium, France, Italy and Spain, these effects have been supported during the fourth period.

A robustness check has been conducted using the 4 indicators of Coronavirus spread for each of the 7 periods. This has been applied on the 273 stocks of the 7 countries during the research period (100 days) and supports the effect of Coronavirus spread on abnormal returns of stock markets during the first and second periods. It’s important to pinpoint that this effect has been supported only for “Relative Cumulative Coronavirus Cases” (RCCC). Another robustness check has been conducted using market return instead of abnormal return, and supported this effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Option-Like Fund Performance Fees in Asset Management via Monte Carlo Actuarial Distortion Pricing Cultural values of parent bank board members and lending by foreign subsidiaries: The moderating role of personal traits Deleveraging CAPM: Asset Betas vs. Equity Betas The Dynamics of Financial Policies and Group Decisions in Private Firms Money Talks: Information and Seignorage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1