抑郁症侦探(公民科学)

I. Beange, Sophia Collins
{"title":"抑郁症侦探(公民科学)","authors":"I. Beange, Sophia Collins","doi":"10.2218/eorc.2022.7114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depression Detectives was a (pilot) online user-led citizen science project which ran between Feb-Sep 2021.  It brought together people with lived experience of depression, and researchers who study it, as EQUAL partners. Each participant gave as much or as little time as suited them.  \nMethod: Depression Detectives took part in Q&A sessions where they quizzed scientists and discussed where there were gaps in the research. They then designed their own research study. \nFrom a huge list of over 50 potential research areas, the group settled on the question: “Do people report all episodes of depression to their GP? And if not, why not?” They looked at this in two ways: \n \nA data science project, carried out by PhD student, Melissa Lewins. \nA set of Focus group questions and an anonymous survey that were answered by members of the Facebook Group. \n \nResults: Focus group / Survey: 84% of our respondents had gone to the doctors with half or less of their episodes of depression. Many went only with their more serious episodes or when they needed practical help (e.g. to be signed off work). Half of them had regretted not going afterwards. \n50% had used private talking therapy instead. Many had managed their episodes using things like exercise, meditation, yoga or social contact. Thus, many of the ways they treated their depression would not be visible within their health records (i.e. not available to data science researchers). \nUK Biobank 1,342 people within UK Biobank answered questionnaires in a way that suggested they had experienced depression AND had given permission for UK Biobank to analyse their GP records. Of those, Melissa found that 67% had no mention of depression in their GP records. \nImpact Public \n“ I liked the way that participants were involved in at an early stage. It felt like we had more influence and choice because of this. It's much more meaningful to involve people early in the project, before major decisions have been made.” All of the participants spoke about their realisation that depression is more complex than they had realised. Some felt more motivated to read research literature. Others had developed a more critical perspective on research and its limitations. One person said they would approach their health-care provider differently – giving more information about complexities/comorbidities. Depression Detectives was not a peer support project, but participants still benefitted immensely from sharing experiences. All interviewees said that they would take part again / recommend to others. \nResearchers  “We discovered that things researchers might take for granted are unknown by the public and vice versa.”  “Insightful directions for future research.” “Really useful to get the opinions of people with lived experience over time.” \nDissemination of Results A short report and infographics for researchers, GPs, policymakers and patients can be found on our blog: https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/depressiondetectives/ \nThis project was a collaboration between Edinburgh Neuroscience and Public Engagement Practitioner Sophia Collins and her team. It was funded by the MRC and Horizon 2020.","PeriodicalId":244254,"journal":{"name":"Edinburgh Open Research","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depression Detectives (Citizen Science)\",\"authors\":\"I. Beange, Sophia Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.2218/eorc.2022.7114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Depression Detectives was a (pilot) online user-led citizen science project which ran between Feb-Sep 2021.  It brought together people with lived experience of depression, and researchers who study it, as EQUAL partners. Each participant gave as much or as little time as suited them.  \\nMethod: Depression Detectives took part in Q&A sessions where they quizzed scientists and discussed where there were gaps in the research. They then designed their own research study. \\nFrom a huge list of over 50 potential research areas, the group settled on the question: “Do people report all episodes of depression to their GP? And if not, why not?” They looked at this in two ways: \\n \\nA data science project, carried out by PhD student, Melissa Lewins. \\nA set of Focus group questions and an anonymous survey that were answered by members of the Facebook Group. \\n \\nResults: Focus group / Survey: 84% of our respondents had gone to the doctors with half or less of their episodes of depression. Many went only with their more serious episodes or when they needed practical help (e.g. to be signed off work). Half of them had regretted not going afterwards. \\n50% had used private talking therapy instead. Many had managed their episodes using things like exercise, meditation, yoga or social contact. Thus, many of the ways they treated their depression would not be visible within their health records (i.e. not available to data science researchers). \\nUK Biobank 1,342 people within UK Biobank answered questionnaires in a way that suggested they had experienced depression AND had given permission for UK Biobank to analyse their GP records. Of those, Melissa found that 67% had no mention of depression in their GP records. \\nImpact Public \\n“ I liked the way that participants were involved in at an early stage. It felt like we had more influence and choice because of this. It's much more meaningful to involve people early in the project, before major decisions have been made.” All of the participants spoke about their realisation that depression is more complex than they had realised. Some felt more motivated to read research literature. Others had developed a more critical perspective on research and its limitations. One person said they would approach their health-care provider differently – giving more information about complexities/comorbidities. Depression Detectives was not a peer support project, but participants still benefitted immensely from sharing experiences. All interviewees said that they would take part again / recommend to others. \\nResearchers  “We discovered that things researchers might take for granted are unknown by the public and vice versa.”  “Insightful directions for future research.” “Really useful to get the opinions of people with lived experience over time.” \\nDissemination of Results A short report and infographics for researchers, GPs, policymakers and patients can be found on our blog: https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/depressiondetectives/ \\nThis project was a collaboration between Edinburgh Neuroscience and Public Engagement Practitioner Sophia Collins and her team. It was funded by the MRC and Horizon 2020.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edinburgh Open Research\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edinburgh Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2218/eorc.2022.7114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edinburgh Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/eorc.2022.7114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抑郁症侦探是一个(试点)在线用户主导的公民科学项目,于2021年2月至9月期间运行。它把有过抑郁经历的人和研究抑郁症的研究人员作为平等的伙伴聚集在一起。每个参与者都根据自己的情况给出了或多或少的时间。方法:抑郁症侦探参加问答环节,向科学家提问,并讨论研究中的不足之处。然后他们设计了自己的研究。从50多个潜在的研究领域中,研究小组确定了一个问题:“人们会向他们的全科医生报告所有的抑郁症发作吗?”如果没有,为什么不呢?”他们从两个方面来看待这个问题:一个数据科学项目,由博士生Melissa Lewins进行。一组焦点小组问题和一份由Facebook小组成员回答的匿名调查。结果:焦点小组/调查:84%的受访者在一半或更少的抑郁发作时去看过医生。许多人只有在病情严重的时候,或者需要实际帮助的时候才会去(比如,要停止工作)。他们中有一半人后来后悔没有去。50%的人转而使用私人谈话疗法。许多人通过锻炼、冥想、瑜伽或社交等方法来控制发作。因此,他们治疗抑郁症的许多方法在他们的健康记录中是看不到的(即数据科学研究人员无法获得)。英国生物银行的1342人回答问卷的方式表明他们经历过抑郁症,并允许英国生物银行分析他们的全科医生记录。其中,梅丽莎发现67%的人在他们的家庭医生记录中没有提到抑郁症。“我喜欢参与者在早期阶段参与的方式。感觉我们因此有了更多的影响力和选择。在做出重大决策之前,让人们尽早参与到项目中会更有意义。”所有的参与者都谈到,他们意识到抑郁症比他们想象的要复杂得多。有些人更有动力去阅读研究文献。其他人则对研究及其局限性形成了更为批判的观点。一个人说他们会以不同的方式接触他们的医疗保健提供者——提供更多关于复杂性/合并症的信息。“抑郁侦探”不是一个同伴支持项目,但参与者仍然从分享经验中受益匪浅。所有受访者都表示会再次参加/推荐给其他人。“我们发现,研究人员认为理所当然的事情,公众可能不知道,反之亦然。”“为未来的研究提供了有见地的方向。“随着时间的推移,获得有生活经验的人的意见真的很有用。”研究人员、全科医生、政策制定者和患者可以在我们的博客上找到一份简短的报告和信息图表:https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/depressiondetectives/这个项目是爱丁堡神经科学和公众参与从业者索菲亚·柯林斯及其团队之间的合作。它是由MRC和地平线2020资助的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Depression Detectives (Citizen Science)
Depression Detectives was a (pilot) online user-led citizen science project which ran between Feb-Sep 2021.  It brought together people with lived experience of depression, and researchers who study it, as EQUAL partners. Each participant gave as much or as little time as suited them.  Method: Depression Detectives took part in Q&A sessions where they quizzed scientists and discussed where there were gaps in the research. They then designed their own research study. From a huge list of over 50 potential research areas, the group settled on the question: “Do people report all episodes of depression to their GP? And if not, why not?” They looked at this in two ways: A data science project, carried out by PhD student, Melissa Lewins. A set of Focus group questions and an anonymous survey that were answered by members of the Facebook Group. Results: Focus group / Survey: 84% of our respondents had gone to the doctors with half or less of their episodes of depression. Many went only with their more serious episodes or when they needed practical help (e.g. to be signed off work). Half of them had regretted not going afterwards. 50% had used private talking therapy instead. Many had managed their episodes using things like exercise, meditation, yoga or social contact. Thus, many of the ways they treated their depression would not be visible within their health records (i.e. not available to data science researchers). UK Biobank 1,342 people within UK Biobank answered questionnaires in a way that suggested they had experienced depression AND had given permission for UK Biobank to analyse their GP records. Of those, Melissa found that 67% had no mention of depression in their GP records. Impact Public “ I liked the way that participants were involved in at an early stage. It felt like we had more influence and choice because of this. It's much more meaningful to involve people early in the project, before major decisions have been made.” All of the participants spoke about their realisation that depression is more complex than they had realised. Some felt more motivated to read research literature. Others had developed a more critical perspective on research and its limitations. One person said they would approach their health-care provider differently – giving more information about complexities/comorbidities. Depression Detectives was not a peer support project, but participants still benefitted immensely from sharing experiences. All interviewees said that they would take part again / recommend to others. Researchers  “We discovered that things researchers might take for granted are unknown by the public and vice versa.”  “Insightful directions for future research.” “Really useful to get the opinions of people with lived experience over time.” Dissemination of Results A short report and infographics for researchers, GPs, policymakers and patients can be found on our blog: https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/depressiondetectives/ This project was a collaboration between Edinburgh Neuroscience and Public Engagement Practitioner Sophia Collins and her team. It was funded by the MRC and Horizon 2020.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining Open and Financial Data for Targeted Policy Solutions Creating a University Wide Resource for Study Design Open Science and Data Analysis Teaching the Best Research Data Management Practices to PhD Students Improving Research Culture and Integrity through Open Science OLS: Capacity Building in Open Science with a Peer-Led, Global, and Diverse Community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1