2020年,根据印尼劳动伊梅尔达医院的信息管理和医疗记录(MIRM 13.4)的标准实施医疗记录审查

Esraida Simanjuntak, Mustamil Alwi Dasopang
{"title":"2020年,根据印尼劳动伊梅尔达医院的信息管理和医疗记录(MIRM 13.4)的标准实施医疗记录审查","authors":"Esraida Simanjuntak, Mustamil Alwi Dasopang","doi":"10.2411/JIPIKI.V6I1.476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nOne of the parameters for determining the quality of health services in the hospital is data or information from good and complete medical records. Medical records are an important part of helping the implementation of service delivery to patients at the hospital. Standards relating to medical records in SNARS Edition 1 are in the group of hospital management standards, namely Medical Record Information Management (MIRM) regarding medical record document processing including provision, filling of medical records and reviewing medical records. This research method is descriptive with the method of observation. When this research was conducted in July 2020 at the Imelda Hospital Worker Indonesia Medan. The population taken was 705 medical record documents while the sample in this study was 87 medical record documents. Based on the results of the study, in the review the accuracy of returning medical record documents was 57.4% and 42.5% were incorrect. Readability review of ER assessment as much as 63.2%, assessment of Inpatient as much as 56.3%, CPPT as much as 60.9%, approval for action as much as 77%, reports of anesthesia as much as 68.9%. 3 forms of completeness review are complete, namely Education Assessment, rejection and education form (100%). Suggestions in this study are that review officers must be more assertive to remind every doctor or other medical personnel to pay attention to the accuracy of the restoration, the legibility of medical record files and the completeness of medical record documents. As well as regularly socializing the elements of the MIRM 13.4 assessment.","PeriodicalId":261208,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda (JIPIKI)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tinjauan Pelaksanaan Review Berkas Rekam Medis Sesuai Standar Manajemen Informasi Dan Rekam Medik (MIRM 13.4) Di Rumah Sakit Imelda Pekerja Indonesia Tahun 2020\",\"authors\":\"Esraida Simanjuntak, Mustamil Alwi Dasopang\",\"doi\":\"10.2411/JIPIKI.V6I1.476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"  \\nOne of the parameters for determining the quality of health services in the hospital is data or information from good and complete medical records. Medical records are an important part of helping the implementation of service delivery to patients at the hospital. Standards relating to medical records in SNARS Edition 1 are in the group of hospital management standards, namely Medical Record Information Management (MIRM) regarding medical record document processing including provision, filling of medical records and reviewing medical records. This research method is descriptive with the method of observation. When this research was conducted in July 2020 at the Imelda Hospital Worker Indonesia Medan. The population taken was 705 medical record documents while the sample in this study was 87 medical record documents. Based on the results of the study, in the review the accuracy of returning medical record documents was 57.4% and 42.5% were incorrect. Readability review of ER assessment as much as 63.2%, assessment of Inpatient as much as 56.3%, CPPT as much as 60.9%, approval for action as much as 77%, reports of anesthesia as much as 68.9%. 3 forms of completeness review are complete, namely Education Assessment, rejection and education form (100%). Suggestions in this study are that review officers must be more assertive to remind every doctor or other medical personnel to pay attention to the accuracy of the restoration, the legibility of medical record files and the completeness of medical record documents. As well as regularly socializing the elements of the MIRM 13.4 assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda (JIPIKI)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda (JIPIKI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2411/JIPIKI.V6I1.476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda (JIPIKI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2411/JIPIKI.V6I1.476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定医院保健服务质量的参数之一是来自良好和完整的医疗记录的数据或信息。医疗记录是帮助医院向患者提供服务的重要组成部分。SNARS第1版中与病历相关的标准属于医院管理标准组,即病历信息管理(MIRM),涉及病历文件处理,包括提供、填写病历和审查病历。本研究方法为观察法描述性研究。这项研究于2020年7月在印度尼西亚棉兰的伊梅尔达医院进行。本研究的样本为87份病历文件,所取人群为705份病历文件。根据研究结果,在审查中,病历文件返回的准确性为57.4%,不正确率为42.5%。ER评估的可读性审查高达63.2%,住院患者评估高达56.3%,CPPT高达60.9%,批准行动高达77%,麻醉报告高达68.9%。完成3种形式的完整性审查,即教育评估,拒绝和教育形式(100%)。本研究的建议是,审查人员必须更加果断地提醒每一位医生或其他医务人员注意恢复的准确性、病历档案的易读性和病历文件的完整性。以及定期社会化MIRM 13.4评估的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tinjauan Pelaksanaan Review Berkas Rekam Medis Sesuai Standar Manajemen Informasi Dan Rekam Medik (MIRM 13.4) Di Rumah Sakit Imelda Pekerja Indonesia Tahun 2020
  One of the parameters for determining the quality of health services in the hospital is data or information from good and complete medical records. Medical records are an important part of helping the implementation of service delivery to patients at the hospital. Standards relating to medical records in SNARS Edition 1 are in the group of hospital management standards, namely Medical Record Information Management (MIRM) regarding medical record document processing including provision, filling of medical records and reviewing medical records. This research method is descriptive with the method of observation. When this research was conducted in July 2020 at the Imelda Hospital Worker Indonesia Medan. The population taken was 705 medical record documents while the sample in this study was 87 medical record documents. Based on the results of the study, in the review the accuracy of returning medical record documents was 57.4% and 42.5% were incorrect. Readability review of ER assessment as much as 63.2%, assessment of Inpatient as much as 56.3%, CPPT as much as 60.9%, approval for action as much as 77%, reports of anesthesia as much as 68.9%. 3 forms of completeness review are complete, namely Education Assessment, rejection and education form (100%). Suggestions in this study are that review officers must be more assertive to remind every doctor or other medical personnel to pay attention to the accuracy of the restoration, the legibility of medical record files and the completeness of medical record documents. As well as regularly socializing the elements of the MIRM 13.4 assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tinjauan Pelaksanaan Penyusutan dan Pemusnahan Rekam Medis di RSUD Muntilan Tinjauan Perancangan Tracer (Outguide) Pada Unit Penyimpanan Rekam Medis Di RSU Imelda Pekerja Indonesia Tahun 2022 Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pelayanan Kesehatan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Inap Di RSUD DR. R.M. Djoelham Binjai Tahun 2022 Analisis Faktor Penyebab Pending Klaim Rawat Inap Akibat Koding Rekam Medis Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (RSUD) Dr. Soedirman Kebumen Comparison of Community Satisfaction with Health Services at Accredited Health Centers in North Sumatra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1