比较韩国和日本的残疾人雇用配额制度

Sunwoo Lee, Sookyung Lee
{"title":"比较韩国和日本的残疾人雇用配额制度","authors":"Sunwoo Lee, Sookyung Lee","doi":"10.14391/AJHS.10.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mandatory employment quota system is a policy that obligates employers to have a workforce with a certain percentage of individuals with disabilities. This study compared the Korean mandatory quota scheme with the Japanese one. They have very similar features even though some differences still exist in details; similar levels of mandatory quotas, similar covered employers, similar sanctions and incentives, and even similar outcomes. The results of this study show that the mandatory quota schemes have a limited effect in enhancing employment rates of disabled people in Korea or in Japan. Unlike Japan, Korea has enforced the Anti-Discrimination Act against Disabled Persons since 2008 though its effect on employment rates of disabled people has not been materialized yet. Anti-discrimination acts against disabled persons are generally considered to be ineffective for increasing employment rates of disabled people. Employment services for disabled persons may be more helpful to increase employment rates of disabled people. A type of delivery system for employment services for disabled persons may be an important factor for employment rates of disabled people. Delivery system for employment services for disabled persons should be closely connected with the labor market as well as the mandatory quota system. The delivery systems for employment services for disabled persons are mostly managed by non-profit organizations in Korea. However, their outcomes are less than expected due to the lack of economic incentives and autonomy. Thus, governments should expand their roles in employment services for disabled persons in order to increase employment rates of disabled people. <Key-words> mandatory quotas, employment for disabled persons, covered employers, sanctions, employment rates sunwlee@inje.ac.kr(Sunwoo LEE) Asian J Human Services, 2016, 10:83-92. © 2016 Asian Society of Human Services Received","PeriodicalId":370734,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of human services","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Employment Quota Systems for Disabled People Between Korea and Japan\",\"authors\":\"Sunwoo Lee, Sookyung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.14391/AJHS.10.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mandatory employment quota system is a policy that obligates employers to have a workforce with a certain percentage of individuals with disabilities. This study compared the Korean mandatory quota scheme with the Japanese one. They have very similar features even though some differences still exist in details; similar levels of mandatory quotas, similar covered employers, similar sanctions and incentives, and even similar outcomes. The results of this study show that the mandatory quota schemes have a limited effect in enhancing employment rates of disabled people in Korea or in Japan. Unlike Japan, Korea has enforced the Anti-Discrimination Act against Disabled Persons since 2008 though its effect on employment rates of disabled people has not been materialized yet. Anti-discrimination acts against disabled persons are generally considered to be ineffective for increasing employment rates of disabled people. Employment services for disabled persons may be more helpful to increase employment rates of disabled people. A type of delivery system for employment services for disabled persons may be an important factor for employment rates of disabled people. Delivery system for employment services for disabled persons should be closely connected with the labor market as well as the mandatory quota system. The delivery systems for employment services for disabled persons are mostly managed by non-profit organizations in Korea. However, their outcomes are less than expected due to the lack of economic incentives and autonomy. Thus, governments should expand their roles in employment services for disabled persons in order to increase employment rates of disabled people. <Key-words> mandatory quotas, employment for disabled persons, covered employers, sanctions, employment rates sunwlee@inje.ac.kr(Sunwoo LEE) Asian J Human Services, 2016, 10:83-92. © 2016 Asian Society of Human Services Received\",\"PeriodicalId\":370734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of human services\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of human services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14391/AJHS.10.83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of human services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14391/AJHS.10.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

强制雇用配额制是要求雇主雇用一定比例的残疾人的政策。本研究比较了韩国和日本的强制性配额制度。它们具有非常相似的特征,尽管在细节上仍然存在一些差异;类似的强制配额水平,类似的覆盖雇主,类似的制裁和激励措施,甚至类似的结果。研究结果表明,在韩国或日本,强制性配额制度对提高残疾人就业率的作用有限。与日本不同,韩国从2008年开始实施了《残疾人反歧视法》,但对残疾人就业率的影响还没有显现出来。针对残疾人的反歧视法案通常被认为对提高残疾人就业率是无效的。残疾人就业服务更有利于提高残疾人就业率。一种类型的残疾人就业服务提供体系可能是影响残疾人就业率的重要因素。残疾人就业服务提供制度应与劳动力市场紧密结合,与强制性配额制紧密结合。在韩国,残疾人就业服务的提供系统大多由非营利组织管理。然而,由于缺乏经济激励和自主权,他们的结果不如预期。因此,政府应扩大在残疾人就业服务中的作用,以提高残疾人的就业率。强制性配额,残疾人就业,涵盖雇主,制裁,就业率sunwlee@inje.ac.kr(Sunwoo LEE)亚洲社会服务J, 2016,10:83-92。©2016亚洲人类服务协会收到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Employment Quota Systems for Disabled People Between Korea and Japan
Mandatory employment quota system is a policy that obligates employers to have a workforce with a certain percentage of individuals with disabilities. This study compared the Korean mandatory quota scheme with the Japanese one. They have very similar features even though some differences still exist in details; similar levels of mandatory quotas, similar covered employers, similar sanctions and incentives, and even similar outcomes. The results of this study show that the mandatory quota schemes have a limited effect in enhancing employment rates of disabled people in Korea or in Japan. Unlike Japan, Korea has enforced the Anti-Discrimination Act against Disabled Persons since 2008 though its effect on employment rates of disabled people has not been materialized yet. Anti-discrimination acts against disabled persons are generally considered to be ineffective for increasing employment rates of disabled people. Employment services for disabled persons may be more helpful to increase employment rates of disabled people. A type of delivery system for employment services for disabled persons may be an important factor for employment rates of disabled people. Delivery system for employment services for disabled persons should be closely connected with the labor market as well as the mandatory quota system. The delivery systems for employment services for disabled persons are mostly managed by non-profit organizations in Korea. However, their outcomes are less than expected due to the lack of economic incentives and autonomy. Thus, governments should expand their roles in employment services for disabled persons in order to increase employment rates of disabled people. mandatory quotas, employment for disabled persons, covered employers, sanctions, employment rates sunwlee@inje.ac.kr(Sunwoo LEE) Asian J Human Services, 2016, 10:83-92. © 2016 Asian Society of Human Services Received
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Feminism in Katherine Mansfield's Bliss A Japan-Korea Comparative Study on Welfare Professional Training Association between Autistic Traits and Maladaptive Behaviors in Preschool Children Using the Child Development Support Center in Japan Explaining Peers with Autism Spectrum Disorder to Others and Coping with Others’ and Siblings’ Negative Attitudes A Study on Awareness of Young Peer Supporters in a Japanese Secondary School Through Thematic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1