道路屏障设计降低公路基础设施上沙漠龟的死亡率

D. Ruby, W. B. Jennings, G. Goodlett, J. Spotila, H. Mushinsky
{"title":"道路屏障设计降低公路基础设施上沙漠龟的死亡率","authors":"D. Ruby, W. B. Jennings, G. Goodlett, J. Spotila, H. Mushinsky","doi":"10.2744/CCB-1533.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. We investigated methods for reducing highway-caused mortality of Mojave Desert Tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) using barriers at the Desert Tortoise Conservation Center, located near Las Vegas, Nevada. Experiments tested effectiveness of various barriers of different heights and made of different construction materials, sex-dependent behaviors including rate of escapes, appropriate height of a barrier, and adverse effects on other sympatric vertebrate species including potential entrapment. Informed by analyzing previous investigations, we tested captive adult desert tortoises (midline carapace length ≥ 180 mm) within enclosures made from 8 different common construction materials, quantified behavioral responses of individuals over several (4–14) days, and identified sex-dependent responses to these barriers. Both sexes pushed against see-through barriers more than solid barriers (58% males, 67% females) and males reversed direction of pacing more often than females (56%). Pen escapes related to pacing reversals and were generally by males. Direction reversals and escapes occurred mostly with wire mesh designs and low (20-cm) solid barriers. Frequency of body contact was not linearly correlated with larger mesh sizes. Solid barriers appear to offer the best deterrent but are more expensive. Animals that escaped in trials lasting several days were larger than average size and often escaped more than once. Tortoises escaped at weak points in barriers, such as gaps with the ground, pen corners, breaks in material, or by climbing over the barrier. In testing minimum effective barrier height for 3 types of barrier materials, none climbed over at 46 cm, 5 climbed over at 30 cm, and 19 others climbed over at lower heights. We observed native species interactions with our barrier enclosures (n = 70) and compared morphometric measurements of common desert reptiles vs. barrier dimensions. These data suggested that different barrier types preferentially affect specific sizes of animals although we observed no mortality. While solid barriers stop all reptiles, wire meshes entrap reptile species smaller than mesh size (such as Callisaurus draconoides and Uta stansburiana) and stop larger species (such as Dipsosaurus dorsalis and Coluber flagellum). Morphometric measures of juvenile tortoises indicated that they could pass through the 2 largest wire mesh sizes we tested.","PeriodicalId":126915,"journal":{"name":"Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of Roadway Barriers to Reduce Desert Tortoise Mortality on Paved Road Infrastructure\",\"authors\":\"D. Ruby, W. B. Jennings, G. Goodlett, J. Spotila, H. Mushinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2744/CCB-1533.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. We investigated methods for reducing highway-caused mortality of Mojave Desert Tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) using barriers at the Desert Tortoise Conservation Center, located near Las Vegas, Nevada. Experiments tested effectiveness of various barriers of different heights and made of different construction materials, sex-dependent behaviors including rate of escapes, appropriate height of a barrier, and adverse effects on other sympatric vertebrate species including potential entrapment. Informed by analyzing previous investigations, we tested captive adult desert tortoises (midline carapace length ≥ 180 mm) within enclosures made from 8 different common construction materials, quantified behavioral responses of individuals over several (4–14) days, and identified sex-dependent responses to these barriers. Both sexes pushed against see-through barriers more than solid barriers (58% males, 67% females) and males reversed direction of pacing more often than females (56%). Pen escapes related to pacing reversals and were generally by males. Direction reversals and escapes occurred mostly with wire mesh designs and low (20-cm) solid barriers. Frequency of body contact was not linearly correlated with larger mesh sizes. Solid barriers appear to offer the best deterrent but are more expensive. Animals that escaped in trials lasting several days were larger than average size and often escaped more than once. Tortoises escaped at weak points in barriers, such as gaps with the ground, pen corners, breaks in material, or by climbing over the barrier. In testing minimum effective barrier height for 3 types of barrier materials, none climbed over at 46 cm, 5 climbed over at 30 cm, and 19 others climbed over at lower heights. We observed native species interactions with our barrier enclosures (n = 70) and compared morphometric measurements of common desert reptiles vs. barrier dimensions. These data suggested that different barrier types preferentially affect specific sizes of animals although we observed no mortality. While solid barriers stop all reptiles, wire meshes entrap reptile species smaller than mesh size (such as Callisaurus draconoides and Uta stansburiana) and stop larger species (such as Dipsosaurus dorsalis and Coluber flagellum). Morphometric measures of juvenile tortoises indicated that they could pass through the 2 largest wire mesh sizes we tested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2744/CCB-1533.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2744/CCB-1533.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在内华达州拉斯维加斯附近的沙漠陆龟保护中心,研究了利用屏障降低公路造成的莫哈韦沙漠陆龟(Gopherus agassizii)死亡率的方法。实验测试了各种不同高度和不同建筑材料的屏障的有效性,性别依赖行为,包括逃跑率,屏障的适当高度,以及对其他同系脊椎动物物种的不利影响,包括潜在的陷阱。在分析以往调查的基础上,我们对圈养的成年沙漠象龟(甲壳中线长度≥180 mm)在8种不同的常见建筑材料的围栏内进行了测试,量化了个体在数天(4-14)内的行为反应,并确定了对这些屏障的性别依赖性反应。男性58%,女性67%),男性比女性更频繁地改变步调方向(56%)。钢笔逃逸与起搏逆转有关,通常是男性。方向逆转和逃逸主要发生在金属丝网设计和低(20厘米)固体屏障。身体接触的频率与较大的网眼尺寸不呈线性相关。坚固的屏障似乎提供了最好的威慑,但更昂贵。在持续数天的试验中逃跑的动物比平均体型要大,而且经常逃跑不止一次。陆龟从屏障的薄弱处逃跑,比如与地面的缝隙、围栏的角落、材料的断裂,或者爬过屏障。在测试3种屏障材料的最小有效屏障高度时,没有人在46 cm处翻越,5人在30 cm处翻越,19人在更低的高度翻越。我们观察了本地物种与屏障的相互作用(n = 70),并比较了常见沙漠爬行动物与屏障尺寸的形态测量结果。这些数据表明,不同的屏障类型优先影响动物的特定大小,尽管我们没有观察到死亡。虽然固体屏障可以阻止所有爬行动物,但铁丝网可以捕获比网尺寸小的爬行动物(如龙角龙和犹他),并阻止较大的物种(如背棘龙和鞭毛龙)。对幼龟的形态测量表明,它们可以穿过我们测试的2种最大的金属丝网。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design of Roadway Barriers to Reduce Desert Tortoise Mortality on Paved Road Infrastructure
Abstract. We investigated methods for reducing highway-caused mortality of Mojave Desert Tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) using barriers at the Desert Tortoise Conservation Center, located near Las Vegas, Nevada. Experiments tested effectiveness of various barriers of different heights and made of different construction materials, sex-dependent behaviors including rate of escapes, appropriate height of a barrier, and adverse effects on other sympatric vertebrate species including potential entrapment. Informed by analyzing previous investigations, we tested captive adult desert tortoises (midline carapace length ≥ 180 mm) within enclosures made from 8 different common construction materials, quantified behavioral responses of individuals over several (4–14) days, and identified sex-dependent responses to these barriers. Both sexes pushed against see-through barriers more than solid barriers (58% males, 67% females) and males reversed direction of pacing more often than females (56%). Pen escapes related to pacing reversals and were generally by males. Direction reversals and escapes occurred mostly with wire mesh designs and low (20-cm) solid barriers. Frequency of body contact was not linearly correlated with larger mesh sizes. Solid barriers appear to offer the best deterrent but are more expensive. Animals that escaped in trials lasting several days were larger than average size and often escaped more than once. Tortoises escaped at weak points in barriers, such as gaps with the ground, pen corners, breaks in material, or by climbing over the barrier. In testing minimum effective barrier height for 3 types of barrier materials, none climbed over at 46 cm, 5 climbed over at 30 cm, and 19 others climbed over at lower heights. We observed native species interactions with our barrier enclosures (n = 70) and compared morphometric measurements of common desert reptiles vs. barrier dimensions. These data suggested that different barrier types preferentially affect specific sizes of animals although we observed no mortality. While solid barriers stop all reptiles, wire meshes entrap reptile species smaller than mesh size (such as Callisaurus draconoides and Uta stansburiana) and stop larger species (such as Dipsosaurus dorsalis and Coluber flagellum). Morphometric measures of juvenile tortoises indicated that they could pass through the 2 largest wire mesh sizes we tested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Egg Size vs. Mass Relationships in Turtles Comparison of Two Methods to Detect the Northwestern Pond Turtle (Actinemys marmorata) and the Invasive American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) in Interior Northern California Young, Wild Desert Tortoises Lead Solitary Lives Population Demographics of Native Red-Bellied Cooters and Invasive Red-Eared Sliders in a Virginia Lake Steroid Hormone Profiles and Demographic Data for Green Turtles (Chelonia mydas) Inhabiting the Mexican Caribbean Coast
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1