论代理及其极限:异地对网络关系形成的不对称影响

Madeline King Kneeland, Adam M. Kleinbaum
{"title":"论代理及其极限:异地对网络关系形成的不对称影响","authors":"Madeline King Kneeland, Adam M. Kleinbaum","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3520640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social networks are integral to the performance of collaborative work, but research on network change has shed little light on the tactics firms use to deliberately stimulate collaborative network ties among their employees. In this paper, we empirically examine one such tactic, corporate offsites, as opportunity shocks for intra-organizational networking. We find that attending an offsite leads participants to significantly increase the number of new network ties that they initiate. But surprisingly, people who do not attend the offsite similarly increase their network outreach, consistent with deliberate compensatory behavior on the part of non-attendees. However, attendees also receive more incoming requests from new collaborators following offsites, a benefit that does not accrue to non-attendees. These results are consistent with a conceptualization of opportunities as affecting network change in two distinct ways: through the changes the individual makes in her own network, which are subject to individual agency, and through the decisions made by others, which also shape the focal individual’s network, but which fall outside of the focal individual’s agency. Integrating the traditional egocentric perspective with an altercentric perspective moves us closer to understanding both an individual’s agency to shape her evolving network and the limits on that agency.","PeriodicalId":319022,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Networks eJournal","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Agency and its Limits: The Asymmetric Effects of Offsites on Network Tie Formation\",\"authors\":\"Madeline King Kneeland, Adam M. Kleinbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3520640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social networks are integral to the performance of collaborative work, but research on network change has shed little light on the tactics firms use to deliberately stimulate collaborative network ties among their employees. In this paper, we empirically examine one such tactic, corporate offsites, as opportunity shocks for intra-organizational networking. We find that attending an offsite leads participants to significantly increase the number of new network ties that they initiate. But surprisingly, people who do not attend the offsite similarly increase their network outreach, consistent with deliberate compensatory behavior on the part of non-attendees. However, attendees also receive more incoming requests from new collaborators following offsites, a benefit that does not accrue to non-attendees. These results are consistent with a conceptualization of opportunities as affecting network change in two distinct ways: through the changes the individual makes in her own network, which are subject to individual agency, and through the decisions made by others, which also shape the focal individual’s network, but which fall outside of the focal individual’s agency. Integrating the traditional egocentric perspective with an altercentric perspective moves us closer to understanding both an individual’s agency to shape her evolving network and the limits on that agency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3520640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Networks eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3520640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

社会网络对于协作工作的表现是不可或缺的,但是对网络变化的研究并没有揭示出公司故意刺激员工之间的协作网络联系的策略。在本文中,我们从经验上考察了一种这样的策略,公司离线,作为组织内部网络的机会冲击。我们发现,参加一个非现场导致参与者显著增加他们发起的新网络关系的数量。但令人惊讶的是,不参加场外会议的人也同样增加了他们的社交网络,这与不参加会议的人有意的补偿行为是一致的。然而,与会者也会收到更多来自新合作者的请求,这对非与会者来说是没有好处的。这些结果与机会以两种不同方式影响网络变化的概念化是一致的:通过个人在自己的网络中做出的变化,这受制于个人代理;通过他人做出的决定,这也塑造了焦点个人的网络,但不属于焦点个人的代理。将传统的自我中心观点与替代中心观点相结合,使我们更接近于理解个人塑造其不断发展的网络的能动性以及该能动性的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On Agency and its Limits: The Asymmetric Effects of Offsites on Network Tie Formation
Social networks are integral to the performance of collaborative work, but research on network change has shed little light on the tactics firms use to deliberately stimulate collaborative network ties among their employees. In this paper, we empirically examine one such tactic, corporate offsites, as opportunity shocks for intra-organizational networking. We find that attending an offsite leads participants to significantly increase the number of new network ties that they initiate. But surprisingly, people who do not attend the offsite similarly increase their network outreach, consistent with deliberate compensatory behavior on the part of non-attendees. However, attendees also receive more incoming requests from new collaborators following offsites, a benefit that does not accrue to non-attendees. These results are consistent with a conceptualization of opportunities as affecting network change in two distinct ways: through the changes the individual makes in her own network, which are subject to individual agency, and through the decisions made by others, which also shape the focal individual’s network, but which fall outside of the focal individual’s agency. Integrating the traditional egocentric perspective with an altercentric perspective moves us closer to understanding both an individual’s agency to shape her evolving network and the limits on that agency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Education-Occupation Mismatch and Social Networks for Hispanics in the US: Role of Citizenship Monitoring Network Changes in Social Media Platform Liability and Innovation The Bipartisan Case for Labeling as a Content Moderation Method: Findings from a National Survey Dealer Networks and the Cost of Immediacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1