加州的逃税和非法卷烟:第四部分:吸烟者的行为和市场对增税的反应

J. Prieger, Jonathan Kulick
{"title":"加州的逃税和非法卷烟:第四部分:吸烟者的行为和市场对增税的反应","authors":"J. Prieger, Jonathan Kulick","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3322095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Appendix is available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3322092 We examine recent survey data from California to investigate smokers’ responses to an increase in cigarette excise-tax rates. We estimate how tax avoidance and the economic crimes of tax evasion and illicit trade in tobacco products (ITTP) changed from 2017 to 2018, during which time the tax rose by $2/pack. The prevalence of each suspicious outcome or illicit activity examined rose markedly after the tax increase—by anywhere from 11% to 331%. We examine how such behaviors correlate with demographic, economic, and attitudinal factors. Some 63% of those still smoking in 2018 acted in ways that undermine, at least partially, the public health rationale for raising tobacco taxes. On the other hand, 66% say they reduced their nicotine use or substituted the use of less harmful delivery systems for cigarette smoking. About 44% of smokers engaged in some legal tax-avoiding behavior in the previous year, 15% evaded taxes through cross-border purchases, and 27% bought untaxed cigarettes in the state in the past month. (These behaviors overlapped substantially.) There is a much lower incidence of counterfeit product and sales of single cigarettes. Smokers who roll their own cigarettes, e-cigarette users, younger smokers, and those with more income and education are all more likely to engage in at least some of the suspect market behaviors examined. The driving time to the nearest cross-border retail locations is significantly associated with tax avoidance and evasion. However, respondents’ attitudes and moral sentiments appear to be more important predictors of suspect and illicit behavior. The results suggest that the tax increase led to significant amounts of adaptive behavior by smokers that likely reduced the intended health benefits of that policy change.","PeriodicalId":330166,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax Evasion and Illicit Cigarettes in California: Part IV— Smokers’ Behavioral and Market Responses to a Tax Increase\",\"authors\":\"J. Prieger, Jonathan Kulick\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3322095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Appendix is available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3322092 We examine recent survey data from California to investigate smokers’ responses to an increase in cigarette excise-tax rates. We estimate how tax avoidance and the economic crimes of tax evasion and illicit trade in tobacco products (ITTP) changed from 2017 to 2018, during which time the tax rose by $2/pack. The prevalence of each suspicious outcome or illicit activity examined rose markedly after the tax increase—by anywhere from 11% to 331%. We examine how such behaviors correlate with demographic, economic, and attitudinal factors. Some 63% of those still smoking in 2018 acted in ways that undermine, at least partially, the public health rationale for raising tobacco taxes. On the other hand, 66% say they reduced their nicotine use or substituted the use of less harmful delivery systems for cigarette smoking. About 44% of smokers engaged in some legal tax-avoiding behavior in the previous year, 15% evaded taxes through cross-border purchases, and 27% bought untaxed cigarettes in the state in the past month. (These behaviors overlapped substantially.) There is a much lower incidence of counterfeit product and sales of single cigarettes. Smokers who roll their own cigarettes, e-cigarette users, younger smokers, and those with more income and education are all more likely to engage in at least some of the suspect market behaviors examined. The driving time to the nearest cross-border retail locations is significantly associated with tax avoidance and evasion. However, respondents’ attitudes and moral sentiments appear to be more important predictors of suspect and illicit behavior. The results suggest that the tax increase led to significant amounts of adaptive behavior by smokers that likely reduced the intended health benefits of that policy change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3322095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3322095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

附录可在:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3322092我们研究了加州最近的调查数据,以调查吸烟者对香烟消费税税率增加的反应。我们估计了2017年至2018年期间避税和逃税经济犯罪以及烟草制品非法贸易(ITTP)的变化情况,在此期间,每包税收增加了2美元。每一项可疑结果或非法活动的检出率都在增税后显著上升——从11%到331%不等。我们研究这些行为如何与人口、经济和态度因素相关。2018年,仍在吸烟的人中约有63%的人的行为,至少在一定程度上破坏了提高烟草税的公共卫生理由。另一方面,66%的人表示他们减少了尼古丁的使用,或用危害较小的输送系统代替吸烟。约44%的吸烟者在前一年有过一些合法的避税行为,15%的人通过跨境购买逃税,27%的人在过去一个月在该州购买了免税香烟。(这些行为在本质上是重叠的。)假冒产品和单支香烟销售的发生率要低得多。自己卷烟的吸烟者、电子烟使用者、年轻吸烟者以及收入和受教育程度较高的人都更有可能参与至少一些可疑的市场行为。开车到最近的跨境零售地点的时间与避税和逃税密切相关。然而,受访者的态度和道德情操似乎是可疑和非法行为的更重要预测因素。结果表明,税收增加导致吸烟者大量的适应性行为,这可能会降低政策变化的预期健康效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tax Evasion and Illicit Cigarettes in California: Part IV— Smokers’ Behavioral and Market Responses to a Tax Increase
Appendix is available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3322092 We examine recent survey data from California to investigate smokers’ responses to an increase in cigarette excise-tax rates. We estimate how tax avoidance and the economic crimes of tax evasion and illicit trade in tobacco products (ITTP) changed from 2017 to 2018, during which time the tax rose by $2/pack. The prevalence of each suspicious outcome or illicit activity examined rose markedly after the tax increase—by anywhere from 11% to 331%. We examine how such behaviors correlate with demographic, economic, and attitudinal factors. Some 63% of those still smoking in 2018 acted in ways that undermine, at least partially, the public health rationale for raising tobacco taxes. On the other hand, 66% say they reduced their nicotine use or substituted the use of less harmful delivery systems for cigarette smoking. About 44% of smokers engaged in some legal tax-avoiding behavior in the previous year, 15% evaded taxes through cross-border purchases, and 27% bought untaxed cigarettes in the state in the past month. (These behaviors overlapped substantially.) There is a much lower incidence of counterfeit product and sales of single cigarettes. Smokers who roll their own cigarettes, e-cigarette users, younger smokers, and those with more income and education are all more likely to engage in at least some of the suspect market behaviors examined. The driving time to the nearest cross-border retail locations is significantly associated with tax avoidance and evasion. However, respondents’ attitudes and moral sentiments appear to be more important predictors of suspect and illicit behavior. The results suggest that the tax increase led to significant amounts of adaptive behavior by smokers that likely reduced the intended health benefits of that policy change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Misdirected Recipients of Tax Reform: Section 199A, its True Beneficiaries, and Application to Low- and Middle- Income Residents Consistent Taxation in a Cashless Society Is It Time to Eliminate Federal Corporate Income Taxes? Brief of Amici Curiae Former Government Officials in Support of Respondents, CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service Allocating COVID-19 State Aid Equitably – The Case of Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1