安全文化与安全人类学

Ł. Trzciński, J. Piwowarski
{"title":"安全文化与安全人类学","authors":"Ł. Trzciński, J. Piwowarski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.1955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of the article is the relationship between security culture and anthropology of securi-ty. The authors recall the most important definitions of security culture and anthropology of security, both of which belong to the discipline of security sciences, and conclude that culture, including its special sphere called security culture, is a human creation that strongly affects people, so it would be difficult to explore it scientifically without anthropological knowledge and tools. The authors give an account of the development of security sciences research in Poland, and point out that its subdiscipline called security anthropology is not fully formed yet, its theoretical and methodological identity still being underway; however, it develops dynamically. In forming this new subdiscipline of security sciences, apart from applying mul-tidisciplinary research, it is also necessary to consider different types of anthropology, above all biological, cultural and philosophical anthropology. The authors signalize the potential di-rections of research within the field and conclude that a methodological framework of securi-ty anthropology should be worked out, in a form that is most important and legible at the cur-rent stage of the development of science.\n\n","PeriodicalId":432439,"journal":{"name":"Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka - Refleksje","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Security culture and security anthropology\",\"authors\":\"Ł. Trzciński, J. Piwowarski\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0013.1955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The topic of the article is the relationship between security culture and anthropology of securi-ty. The authors recall the most important definitions of security culture and anthropology of security, both of which belong to the discipline of security sciences, and conclude that culture, including its special sphere called security culture, is a human creation that strongly affects people, so it would be difficult to explore it scientifically without anthropological knowledge and tools. The authors give an account of the development of security sciences research in Poland, and point out that its subdiscipline called security anthropology is not fully formed yet, its theoretical and methodological identity still being underway; however, it develops dynamically. In forming this new subdiscipline of security sciences, apart from applying mul-tidisciplinary research, it is also necessary to consider different types of anthropology, above all biological, cultural and philosophical anthropology. The authors signalize the potential di-rections of research within the field and conclude that a methodological framework of securi-ty anthropology should be worked out, in a form that is most important and legible at the cur-rent stage of the development of science.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":432439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka - Refleksje\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka - Refleksje\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.1955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka - Refleksje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.1955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主题是安全文化与安全人类学的关系。作者回顾了安全文化和安全人类学最重要的定义,这两个定义都属于安全科学的学科,并得出结论,文化,包括其称为安全文化的特殊领域,是一种强烈影响人们的人类创造,因此如果没有人类学的知识和工具,就很难科学地探索它。本文介绍了波兰安全科学研究的发展情况,指出其分支学科安全人类学尚未完全形成,其理论和方法认同仍在进行中;然而,它是动态发展的。在形成安全科学这一新的分支学科时,除了应用多学科研究外,还必须考虑不同类型的人类学,首先是生物、文化和哲学人类学。作者指出了该领域的潜在研究方向,并得出结论,应制定安全人类学的方法框架,其形式在科学发展的当前阶段是最重要和最清晰的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Security culture and security anthropology
The topic of the article is the relationship between security culture and anthropology of securi-ty. The authors recall the most important definitions of security culture and anthropology of security, both of which belong to the discipline of security sciences, and conclude that culture, including its special sphere called security culture, is a human creation that strongly affects people, so it would be difficult to explore it scientifically without anthropological knowledge and tools. The authors give an account of the development of security sciences research in Poland, and point out that its subdiscipline called security anthropology is not fully formed yet, its theoretical and methodological identity still being underway; however, it develops dynamically. In forming this new subdiscipline of security sciences, apart from applying mul-tidisciplinary research, it is also necessary to consider different types of anthropology, above all biological, cultural and philosophical anthropology. The authors signalize the potential di-rections of research within the field and conclude that a methodological framework of securi-ty anthropology should be worked out, in a form that is most important and legible at the cur-rent stage of the development of science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Przemoc i agresja wśród nieletnich na przykładzie uczniów szkół specjalnych powiatu ostródzkiego Polski rynek pracy dla uchodźców z Ukrainy Teoria sekurytyzacji szkoły kopenhaskiej wobec terrorystycznej nieoczywistości na przykładzie amerykańskiej strategii zapobiegawczej Przemoc domowa wobec kobiet na przykładzie miasta Ostrołęka Rozwój zdolności w domenie kosmicznej przez potentatów kosmicznych
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1