微服务系统中选择模式和策略的决策模型及其实践者的评估

M. Waseem, Peng Liang, Aakash Ahmad, Mojtaba Shahin, A. Khan, Gast'on M'arquez
{"title":"微服务系统中选择模式和策略的决策模型及其实践者的评估","authors":"M. Waseem, Peng Liang, Aakash Ahmad, Mojtaba Shahin, A. Khan, Gast'on M'arquez","doi":"10.1145/3510457.3513079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers and practitioners have recently proposed many Mi-croservices Architecture (MSA) patterns and strategies covering various aspects of microservices system life cycle, such as service design and security. However, selecting and implementing these patterns and strategies can entail various challenges for microser-vices practitioners. To this end, this study proposes decision models for selecting patterns and strategies covering four MSA design ar-eas: application decomposition into microservices, microservices security, microservices communication, and service discovery. We used peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the patterns, strategies, and quality attributes for creating these decision models. To evaluate the familiarity, understandability, completeness, and usefulness of the decision models, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 microservices practitioners from 12 countries across five continents. Our evaluation results show that the prac-titioners found the decision models as an effective guide to select microservices patterns and strategies.","PeriodicalId":119790,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision Models for Selecting Patterns and Strategies in Microservices Systems and their Evaluation by Practitioners\",\"authors\":\"M. Waseem, Peng Liang, Aakash Ahmad, Mojtaba Shahin, A. Khan, Gast'on M'arquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3510457.3513079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers and practitioners have recently proposed many Mi-croservices Architecture (MSA) patterns and strategies covering various aspects of microservices system life cycle, such as service design and security. However, selecting and implementing these patterns and strategies can entail various challenges for microser-vices practitioners. To this end, this study proposes decision models for selecting patterns and strategies covering four MSA design ar-eas: application decomposition into microservices, microservices security, microservices communication, and service discovery. We used peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the patterns, strategies, and quality attributes for creating these decision models. To evaluate the familiarity, understandability, completeness, and usefulness of the decision models, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 microservices practitioners from 12 countries across five continents. Our evaluation results show that the prac-titioners found the decision models as an effective guide to select microservices patterns and strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3510457.3513079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3510457.3513079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

研究人员和从业者最近提出了许多微服务体系结构(MSA)模式和策略,涵盖了微服务系统生命周期的各个方面,如服务设计和安全性。然而,选择和实现这些模式和策略可能会给微服务从业者带来各种挑战。为此,本研究提出了选择模式和策略的决策模型,涵盖了四个MSA设计领域:应用程序分解为微服务、微服务安全、微服务通信和服务发现。我们使用同行评审和灰色文献来识别模式、策略和创建这些决策模型的质量属性。为了评估决策模型的熟悉度、可理解性、完整性和有用性,我们对来自五大洲12个国家的24位微服务从业者进行了半结构化访谈。我们的评估结果表明,从业者发现决策模型是选择微服务模式和策略的有效指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decision Models for Selecting Patterns and Strategies in Microservices Systems and their Evaluation by Practitioners
Researchers and practitioners have recently proposed many Mi-croservices Architecture (MSA) patterns and strategies covering various aspects of microservices system life cycle, such as service design and security. However, selecting and implementing these patterns and strategies can entail various challenges for microser-vices practitioners. To this end, this study proposes decision models for selecting patterns and strategies covering four MSA design ar-eas: application decomposition into microservices, microservices security, microservices communication, and service discovery. We used peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the patterns, strategies, and quality attributes for creating these decision models. To evaluate the familiarity, understandability, completeness, and usefulness of the decision models, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 microservices practitioners from 12 countries across five continents. Our evaluation results show that the prac-titioners found the decision models as an effective guide to select microservices patterns and strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Industry's Cry for Tools that Support Large-Scale Refactoring Code Reviewer Recommendation in Tencent: Practice, Challenge, and Direction* What's bothering developers in code review? The Impact of Flaky Tests on Historical Test Prioritization on Chrome Surveying the Developer Experience of Flaky Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1