当代公共教育的公平、平等与改革

M. Grant, Nadira Raghanunandan-Jack, T. Husband, Chaquita Brown, C. Slattery
{"title":"当代公共教育的公平、平等与改革","authors":"M. Grant, Nadira Raghanunandan-Jack, T. Husband, Chaquita Brown, C. Slattery","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-4960-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Principles of equity have largely been overlooked in the field of education in favor of an acute focus on equality. Brown vs. Board of Education challenged practices of separate but equal, maintaining that equality was the foundation on which education should be built if all students were to benefit from education. Without a dual consideration for both equity and equality, practitioners are limited in their ability to provide an appropriate education to diverse populations of children. It is not enough to give students the same access to learning opportunities and resources. Educators must also create individualized pathways to the learning environment if all students are to benefit academically.","PeriodicalId":268993,"journal":{"name":"Research Anthology on Racial Equity, Identity, and Privilege","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity, Equality, and Reform in Contemporary Public Education\",\"authors\":\"M. Grant, Nadira Raghanunandan-Jack, T. Husband, Chaquita Brown, C. Slattery\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-5225-4960-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Principles of equity have largely been overlooked in the field of education in favor of an acute focus on equality. Brown vs. Board of Education challenged practices of separate but equal, maintaining that equality was the foundation on which education should be built if all students were to benefit from education. Without a dual consideration for both equity and equality, practitioners are limited in their ability to provide an appropriate education to diverse populations of children. It is not enough to give students the same access to learning opportunities and resources. Educators must also create individualized pathways to the learning environment if all students are to benefit academically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Anthology on Racial Equity, Identity, and Privilege\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Anthology on Racial Equity, Identity, and Privilege\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4960-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Anthology on Racial Equity, Identity, and Privilege","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4960-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在教育领域,公平原则在很大程度上被忽视了,而倾向于高度重视平等。布朗诉教育委员会案挑战了隔离但平等的做法,坚持平等是教育的基础,如果所有学生都能从教育中受益,教育就应该建立在平等的基础上。如果没有对公平和平等的双重考虑,从业人员为不同人群的儿童提供适当教育的能力就会受到限制。仅仅让学生获得同样的学习机会和资源是不够的。如果要让所有学生在学业上受益,教育者还必须创造个性化的学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equity, Equality, and Reform in Contemporary Public Education
Principles of equity have largely been overlooked in the field of education in favor of an acute focus on equality. Brown vs. Board of Education challenged practices of separate but equal, maintaining that equality was the foundation on which education should be built if all students were to benefit from education. Without a dual consideration for both equity and equality, practitioners are limited in their ability to provide an appropriate education to diverse populations of children. It is not enough to give students the same access to learning opportunities and resources. Educators must also create individualized pathways to the learning environment if all students are to benefit academically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microaggressions Equity, Equality, and Reform in Contemporary Public Education “I Didn't Believe Privilege Existed Before This” Liberty Needs Glasses Narrative Theory as a Pedagogical Strategy for Culturally Responsive Teaching at HBCUs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1