评估发展差距

I. Sinitsina, A. Chubrik, I. Denisova, V. Dubrovskiy, M. Rokicka, M. Tokmazishvili, M. Kartseva, Irina Makenbaeva
{"title":"评估发展差距","authors":"I. Sinitsina, A. Chubrik, I. Denisova, V. Dubrovskiy, M. Rokicka, M. Tokmazishvili, M. Kartseva, Irina Makenbaeva","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1389734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current report aims to identify major existing gaps in the four socio-economic dimensions (economic, human, environmental, and institutional) and to reveal those gaps which could potentially hinder social and economic integration of neighbor states with the EU. To achieve this, the authors aim to assess the existing trends in the size of the gaps across countries and problem areas, taking into consideration the specific origin of the gap between EU15/EU12, on the one hand, and FSU republics, EU candidates and West Balkan countries, on the other hand. The paper is structured as follows: (1) An analysis of the historic roots and origins of the development gap, and its evolvement over time. (2) A review of literature sources, draft analysis of primary statistical data, and qualitative explanations of gaps and divergences in selected development issues across four socio-economic dimensions: • level of economic development and convergence rates based on real GDP (application of methodology testing s and ? convergence to the set of countries analyzed); • quality of life and its components (poverty, inequality, health status and Heath care, access to fresh water and sanitation facilities, subjective perceptions of well-being); • human capital and labor market development, including level of education and public spending on education, its accessibility and quality, main differences in labor market development (employment participation rates and levels of unemployment, new jobs creation and labor protection legislation); • innovation potential, including RD • environmental performance in terms of environmental stresses, efforts aimed at their reduction, and institutional capacity; • business climate, political institutions, and other institutional indicators (econometric analysis). (3) A test econometric analysis of development gaps across selected dimensions by using a Principal Components Method (PCM). The results are further presented in the form of ranks of countries analyzed reflecting their distances from EU15 in respective aggregate averages. Special attention is paid to gender-related development issues. Respective issues in human capital and labor market study, as well as variables included into PCM analysis were supplemented with relative gender data. Several preliminary conclusions finalize the report.","PeriodicalId":142467,"journal":{"name":"Labor: Human Capital","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Development Gap\",\"authors\":\"I. Sinitsina, A. Chubrik, I. Denisova, V. Dubrovskiy, M. Rokicka, M. Tokmazishvili, M. Kartseva, Irina Makenbaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1389734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current report aims to identify major existing gaps in the four socio-economic dimensions (economic, human, environmental, and institutional) and to reveal those gaps which could potentially hinder social and economic integration of neighbor states with the EU. To achieve this, the authors aim to assess the existing trends in the size of the gaps across countries and problem areas, taking into consideration the specific origin of the gap between EU15/EU12, on the one hand, and FSU republics, EU candidates and West Balkan countries, on the other hand. The paper is structured as follows: (1) An analysis of the historic roots and origins of the development gap, and its evolvement over time. (2) A review of literature sources, draft analysis of primary statistical data, and qualitative explanations of gaps and divergences in selected development issues across four socio-economic dimensions: • level of economic development and convergence rates based on real GDP (application of methodology testing s and ? convergence to the set of countries analyzed); • quality of life and its components (poverty, inequality, health status and Heath care, access to fresh water and sanitation facilities, subjective perceptions of well-being); • human capital and labor market development, including level of education and public spending on education, its accessibility and quality, main differences in labor market development (employment participation rates and levels of unemployment, new jobs creation and labor protection legislation); • innovation potential, including RD • environmental performance in terms of environmental stresses, efforts aimed at their reduction, and institutional capacity; • business climate, political institutions, and other institutional indicators (econometric analysis). (3) A test econometric analysis of development gaps across selected dimensions by using a Principal Components Method (PCM). The results are further presented in the form of ranks of countries analyzed reflecting their distances from EU15 in respective aggregate averages. Special attention is paid to gender-related development issues. Respective issues in human capital and labor market study, as well as variables included into PCM analysis were supplemented with relative gender data. Several preliminary conclusions finalize the report.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor: Human Capital\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor: Human Capital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1389734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor: Human Capital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1389734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本报告旨在确定四个社会经济维度(经济,人力,环境和制度)中存在的主要差距,并揭示这些差距可能会阻碍邻国与欧盟的社会和经济一体化。为了实现这一目标,作者旨在评估各国和问题领域之间差距规模的现有趋势,同时考虑到EU15/EU12与FSU共和国、欧盟候选者和西巴尔干国家之间差距的具体来源。本文的结构如下:(1)分析了发展差距的历史根源和成因,以及发展差距的历史演变。(2)文献来源的回顾,主要统计数据的分析草案,以及在四个社会经济维度上对选定发展问题的差距和分歧的定性解释:•经济发展水平和基于实际GDP的趋同率(应用方法测试s和?趋同于所分析的国家组);•生活质量及其组成部分(贫穷、不平等、健康状况和保健、获得淡水和卫生设施的机会、对幸福的主观看法);•人力资本和劳动力市场的发展,包括教育水平和公共教育支出、教育的可及性和质量、劳动力市场发展的主要差异(就业参与率和失业水平、创造新的就业机会和劳动保护立法);•在环境压力方面的环境绩效、旨在减少环境压力的努力和机构能力;•商业环境、政治制度和其他制度指标(计量经济分析)。(3)采用主成分法(PCM)对各维度发展差距进行计量检验分析。结果进一步以分析的国家排名的形式呈现,反映了它们在各自的总平均值上与欧盟15国的距离。特别注意与性别有关的发展问题。人力资本和劳动力市场研究中各自的问题以及纳入PCM分析的变量补充了相关的性别数据。几项初步结论使报告定稿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Development Gap
Current report aims to identify major existing gaps in the four socio-economic dimensions (economic, human, environmental, and institutional) and to reveal those gaps which could potentially hinder social and economic integration of neighbor states with the EU. To achieve this, the authors aim to assess the existing trends in the size of the gaps across countries and problem areas, taking into consideration the specific origin of the gap between EU15/EU12, on the one hand, and FSU republics, EU candidates and West Balkan countries, on the other hand. The paper is structured as follows: (1) An analysis of the historic roots and origins of the development gap, and its evolvement over time. (2) A review of literature sources, draft analysis of primary statistical data, and qualitative explanations of gaps and divergences in selected development issues across four socio-economic dimensions: • level of economic development and convergence rates based on real GDP (application of methodology testing s and ? convergence to the set of countries analyzed); • quality of life and its components (poverty, inequality, health status and Heath care, access to fresh water and sanitation facilities, subjective perceptions of well-being); • human capital and labor market development, including level of education and public spending on education, its accessibility and quality, main differences in labor market development (employment participation rates and levels of unemployment, new jobs creation and labor protection legislation); • innovation potential, including RD • environmental performance in terms of environmental stresses, efforts aimed at their reduction, and institutional capacity; • business climate, political institutions, and other institutional indicators (econometric analysis). (3) A test econometric analysis of development gaps across selected dimensions by using a Principal Components Method (PCM). The results are further presented in the form of ranks of countries analyzed reflecting their distances from EU15 in respective aggregate averages. Special attention is paid to gender-related development issues. Respective issues in human capital and labor market study, as well as variables included into PCM analysis were supplemented with relative gender data. Several preliminary conclusions finalize the report.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Doughboys Network: Social Interactions and the Employment of World War I Veterans Low-Skill Employment and the Changing Economy of Rural America Grade Inflation, Social Background, and Labour Market Matching Schools Before Tools? The Role of Human Capital in a Market Economy Education, Innovation, and Long-Run Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1